Next due
11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 3 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 7 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 12 days 21 OCTTax Audit Report · Form 3CA/3CB · AY 2026-27 · extended from 30 Sepin 13 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 22 days 7 NOVTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Oct 2026in 30 days 21 NOVITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27 · extended from 31 Octin 44 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 52 days
All due dates

SA 710, Comparative Information - Corresponding Figures and Comparative Financial Statements: audit procedures, reporting on corresponding figures and on comparative statements, prior periods audited by a predecessor or not audited

Two approaches exist. With corresponding figures, the opinion covers the current period only and does not refer to them (paragraph 10). With comparative financial statements, the...

Published
Updated
Reading time
8 min
Views
7
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Medium Complexity
  • In-Depth Guide
Topic
Accounting Standards & Bookkeeping
Published
October 3, 2026
Last updated
Oct 7, 2026
Reading time
8 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

SA 710 deals with last year's figures shown beside this year's. It says what the auditor checks about them, and how the report changes depending on whether they are corresponding figures, which are part of the current statements, or comparative statements, which are reported on separately.

SA 710, as effective for audits of financial statements for periods beginning on or after 1 April 2011, applies to every audit where comparative information is presented. ICAI may revise standards, so check icai.org for the current text. Comparatives that tie to last year's signed accounts depend on well-kept books of accounts.

Scope and the two approaches (paragraphs 1-6)

The standard covers comparative information. Where the prior period was audited by a predecessor or not audited, the opening balances requirements of SA 510 also apply (paragraph 1). Law, regulation or the engagement terms often fix the approach (paragraph 2).

Term (paragraph 6)Plain meaning
Comparative informationAmounts and disclosures for one or more prior periods, as the framework requires
Corresponding figuresPrior-period amounts included as an integral part of the current statements, to be read only in relation to current figures; detail is set by relevance to the current period
Comparative financial statementsPrior-period amounts included for comparison; if audited, referred to in the opinion; detail is comparable to the current statements

The essential difference in reporting: with corresponding figures the opinion refers to the current period only, whereas with comparative statements it refers to each period (paragraph 3). A footnote to paragraph 2 says that financial reporting frameworks in India typically use the corresponding figures approach for general purpose financial statements.

Audit procedures (paragraphs 7-9)

StepWhat the auditor doesParagraph
Presence and classificationDetermines whether the comparatives the framework requires are included and properly classified7
AgreementChecks that the comparatives agree with the amounts and disclosures presented in the prior period7(a)
PoliciesChecks that policies are consistent with the current period, or that changes are properly accounted for, presented and disclosed7(b)
Possible misstatementIf a possible material misstatement in the comparatives comes to notice, performs the additional procedures needed; if the auditor audited the prior period, also follows SA 560 on facts known after the report date8
RepresentationsRequests written representations for all periods referred to in the opinion, plus a specific representation on any prior period item separately disclosed in the current year's statement of profit and loss9

For comparative financial statements the representations cover all periods referred to in the opinion, because management has to reaffirm those earlier representations; for corresponding figures they cover the current period statements, which include the corresponding figures, plus the specific prior period item representation (A1). See SA 580 and SA 560.

Reporting on corresponding figures (paragraphs 10-14)

The opinion does not refer to the corresponding figures, because it is on the current statements as a whole, including those figures (paragraph 10, A2). There are exceptions.

SituationEffect on the reportParagraph
Prior report was qualified, adverse or disclaimed, and the matter is unresolvedModify the current opinion; the Basis paragraph refers to both current and corresponding figures if the effects on current figures are material, or otherwise explains that the opinion is modified because of effects on comparability11
Material misstatement in prior statements previously given an unmodified opinionCheck whether it was dealt with under the framework; if not, express a qualified or adverse opinion on the current statements, modified for the corresponding figures12
Prior period audited by a predecessor, and the auditor may refer to the predecessor's report and decides toOther Matter paragraph: that a predecessor audited, the type of opinion and reasons if modified, and the date of the report13
Prior period unauditedOther Matter paragraph that the corresponding figures are unaudited; opening balance evidence is still needed14

If the prior modification has been resolved and properly dealt with, the current opinion need not refer to it (A3). An unresolved matter may not affect current figures but can still require a modification because of effects on comparability (A4). Where prior statements were misstated, not amended, no revised report was issued under SA 560, and the corresponding figures are properly dealt with and disclosed, an Emphasis of Matter paragraph may be added (A6). Where the prior period was unaudited, the auditor should ask management to disclose that fact on the face of the current statements (A7a). If the auditor has difficulty getting evidence on opening balances, this may be a key audit matter, and inability to get it leads to a qualified opinion or disclaimer (A8; see SA 705).

Reporting on comparative financial statements (paragraphs 15-19)

SituationEffect on the reportParagraph
Comparative statements presentedThe opinion refers to each period presented and audited15
Opinion on prior statements differs from the one previously givenSubstantive reasons given in an Other Matter paragraph16
Prior period audited by a predecessorOther Matter paragraph with the same three points as above, unless the predecessor's report is revised with the statements17
Material misstatement found in prior statements that the predecessor reported on without modificationTell management and governance and ask that the predecessor be informed; if the predecessor issues a new report on amended statements, report only on the current period18
Prior period unauditedOther Matter paragraph that comparatives are unaudited; opening balance evidence still needed19

Because the report covers each period, the auditor may give a modified opinion or an Emphasis of Matter for one period and a different opinion on the other (A9). If the opinion on the prior period differs from what was previously expressed because new circumstances came to light in the current audit, the auditor may have additional duties to prevent future reliance on the earlier report (A11). If the predecessor cannot or will not revise its report, the Other Matter paragraph may say the predecessor reported before amendment, and the auditor, if satisfied about the adjustments, may add a paragraph saying it audited the adjustments but does not give an opinion or assurance on the prior period as a whole (A12). For the communication with a predecessor see section on previous auditor communication.

The standard's appendix has illustrative reports for modified prior opinions, predecessor audits and comparative statements; they are not copied here.

India-specific change

The printed text notes that ISA 710's provisions on restating prior period statements (paragraphs 9 and 12 of the ISA) are replaced in the Indian text by a requirement tied to prior period items disclosed separately in the statement of profit and loss, citing AS 5 as printed. The standard names this as the reason a specific representation about such items is required (paragraph 9).

Illustrative example

Larkspur Textiles Pvt Ltd is an invented company; all figures are illustrative. It presents 2025-26 figures with 2024-25 as corresponding figures. The previous auditor qualified the 2024-25 report because stock records were incomplete, and the matter is unresolved. The new auditor modifies the 2025-26 opinion and explains in the Basis section that the effects on the current figures are material and so refers to both. In a second case, the 2024-25 statements were unaudited because the company was newly converted. The current report has an Other Matter paragraph saying the corresponding figures are unaudited, the notes say so on the face of the statements, and the auditor still performs the opening balance procedures. Management also gives a specific representation about a Rs 15 lakh prior period item shown separately in the profit and loss.

Need help with prior-year comparatives?

Comparatives that agree to last year's signed accounts, with prior period items clearly labelled, save the auditor time. TaxClue's books of accounts compliance support can help your team tie comparatives to last year's accounts and document any regrouping before the audit begins.

Key takeaways

  • Corresponding figures sit within the current-period opinion; comparative statements get an opinion for each period.
  • Comparatives must agree with last year's accounts and use consistent policies.
  • An unresolved prior modification can modify the current opinion.
  • Predecessor or unaudited years are explained in an Other Matter paragraph.
  • A specific representation covers prior period items in the profit and loss statement.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the Standards on Auditing and quality standards issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, in the versions named in the article, and ICAI's announcement of 31 March 2026 on SQM 1 and SQM 2, as consulted on 3 October 2026. ICAI revises standards from time to time; check the current text and effective dates on icai.org. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About SA 710 Comparative Information

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Which approach is used in India?

The printed text notes that frameworks in India typically use corresponding figures for general purpose statements (footnote to paragraph 2).

Does the opinion mention last year's figures?

Not with corresponding figures, except in the cases of unresolved modifications, misstatement and prior-period reports described above (paragraph 10).

Close the month before you plan the next one.

— TaxClue Accounts & Audit Desk

SA 710 Comparative Information: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,350 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

The printed text notes that frameworks in India typically use corresponding figures for general purpose statements (footnote to paragraph 2).

Not with corresponding figures, except in the cases of unresolved modifications, misstatement and prior-period reports described above (paragraph 10).

The report says the corresponding figures are unaudited, and the auditor still gets evidence on opening balances (paragraph 14).

If the matter is unresolved, the current opinion is modified; if resolved and properly dealt with, no reference is needed (paragraph 11, A3).

For comparative statements, representations cover all periods reported on; for corresponding figures, there is a specific representation on any prior period item (paragraph 9, A1).

Where law allows and the auditor decides to refer to it, yes, through an Other Matter paragraph (paragraph 13).