Next due
11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 3 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 7 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 12 days 21 OCTTax Audit Report · Form 3CA/3CB · AY 2026-27 · extended from 30 Sepin 13 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 22 days 7 NOVTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Oct 2026in 30 days 21 NOVITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27 · extended from 31 Octin 44 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 52 days
All due dates

Sections 46–47 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932: Winding Up and Continuing Authority of Partners

On dissolution, every partner or his representative may require, as against all the other partners or their representatives, that the firm's property be applied in payment of the...

Published
Updated
Reading time
7 min
Views
5
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Low Complexity
Topic
LLP & Partnership
Published
October 1, 2026
Last updated
Oct 7, 2026
Reading time
7 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Once a firm is dissolved, its affairs have to be wound up. Section 46 gives every partner a right to have the firm's property applied to pay debts and to have any surplus shared. Section 47 says each partner's authority to bind the firm continues after dissolution only as far as winding up needs. If you are winding up a firm, our legal consultation service can help you plan the order of steps.

Section 46: the right to have the business wound up

The text says: on the dissolution of a firm every partner or his representative is entitled, as against all the other partners or their representatives, to:

  1. have the property of the firm applied in payment of the debts and liabilities of the firm; and
  2. have the surplus distributed among the partners or their representatives according to their rights.
FeatureWhat the text says
Who has the rightEvery partner or his representative (for example the estate of a deceased partner)
Against whomAll the other partners or their representatives
First stepThe firm's property is applied to debts and liabilities
Second stepThe surplus is distributed according to their rights
Words "subject to contract"Not present in the section

Two things stand out. The right can be exercised by a representative, so the estate of a deceased partner is not left outside. And the section fixes the sequence in principle: debts first, surplus after. The detailed order of payment, and how losses are met, is in section 48, and the position of the firm's debts against a partner's personal debts is in section 49.

The section does not say how long winding up may take, who conducts it, or whether the Court appoints a receiver. The text is silent on those. In practice, a partner who wants winding up and meets resistance from the others may need to go to Court; our legal dispute resolution service can help with that.

Example. A three-partner firm is dissolved. It owns stock and a bank balance and owes Rs 6 lakh to suppliers. One partner wants to take the stock for his own use and leave the debts unpaid. Under section 46, each of the other partners can insist that the firm's property first be applied in paying the debts, and that only the surplus be divided according to their rights.

Section 47: authority that continues for winding up

Section 47 says that after the dissolution of a firm the authority of each partner to bind the firm, and the other mutual rights and obligations of the partners, continue notwithstanding the dissolution, but only:

  • so far as may be necessary to wind up the affairs of the firm, and
  • to complete transactions begun but unfinished at the time of the dissolution,

"but not otherwise."

So after dissolution a partner cannot start new business for the firm. He may collect debts, pay creditors, sell stock, and finish a contract that was already under way. The words "so far as may be necessary" set the limit. The Act does not list what counts as necessary; it depends on the facts.

Example. After dissolution, partner Rohit signs a letter completing delivery under a contract the firm had entered into before dissolution. That is a transaction begun but unfinished, within section 47. If instead Rohit takes a fresh order from a new customer on the firm's behalf, it falls outside "but not otherwise", though a third party who did not know of the dissolution may still be able to rely on section 45 until public notice is given; see section 45.

The proviso: the insolvent partner

The proviso says that the firm is in no case bound by the acts of a partner who has been adjudicated an insolvent. But this does not affect the liability of any person who, after the adjudication, has represented himself, or knowingly permitted himself to be represented, as a partner of the insolvent. That mirrors the holding-out rule in section 28.

CaseResult
Insolvent partner acts after adjudicationThe firm is not bound
Another person represents himself, or knowingly lets himself be represented, as a partner of the insolvent after adjudicationHis liability is not affected by the proviso

The copy consulted carries a "Short Note" case summary under section 47; it is the compiler's note, not the Act, and is not used here.

Sections 46 and 47 together

Section 46Section 47
SubjectRight to have property applied and surplus distributedAuthority and mutual rights that continue
Whose right or powerEach partner or his representativeEach partner
LimitDebts and liabilities first; then surplusOnly as necessary to wind up and finish unfinished transactions
"Subject to contract" in textNoNo

What can the deed change?

Neither section carries "subject to contract" wording. The deed can supply the machinery, for example naming who will wind up and by when, but it is not stated to remove the rights in section 46 or the limit in section 47. Accounting rules in section 48 are expressly subject to agreement.

Practical points

  • Appoint one partner or a liquidator-like person in the dissolution deed to run the winding up.
  • List unfinished contracts on the dissolution date and decide who will complete them.
  • Stop fresh business in the firm's name.
  • Pay debts before distributing anything.
  • Follow with settlement of accounts; see settlement of accounts after dissolution.

Need help with winding up?

Winding up involves bank accounts, creditors, stock, tax closure and records. Our legal consultation service can help you set the sequence and prepare the dissolution deed and closing accounts. Bring the deed, the last balance sheet and a list of creditors and unfinished work.

Key takeaways

  • On dissolution, every partner or his representative can require the firm's property to be applied in paying the firm's debts and the surplus to be distributed according to their rights (s.46).
  • After dissolution, a partner's authority to bind the firm continues only as needed to wind up and complete unfinished transactions (s.47).
  • The firm is in no case bound by the acts of a partner adjudicated insolvent; holding-out liability remains.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the text of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 as consulted on 1 October 2026. Several States have amended the registration chapter and make their own rules, forms and fees for the Registrar of Firms. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text and your State's rules before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Sections 46

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Who can ask for the firm's property to be applied in paying debts?

Every partner or his representative, against all the other partners or their representatives (s.46).

Can a partner take new business after dissolution?

Section 47 keeps authority only as necessary to wind up and complete unfinished transactions, "but not otherwise".

Limited liability protects the careful partner; it does not protect careless records.

— TaxClue LLP & Partnership Desk

Sections 46: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,350 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

Every partner or his representative, against all the other partners or their representatives (s.46).

Section 47 keeps authority only as necessary to wind up and complete unfinished transactions, "but not otherwise".

The text speaks of transactions begun but unfinished at dissolution. It gives no list, so it depends on the facts.

No. The proviso to section 47 says the firm is in no case bound by them.

No. His liability is not affected if, after the adjudication, he represented himself or knowingly permitted himself to be represented as a partner of the insolvent.

No. The text is silent; the deed or the Court may address it.