Next due
7 OCTTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Sep 2026in 4 days 11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 8 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 12 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 17 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 27 days 31 OCTITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27in 28 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 57 days 15 DECAdvance Tax · 3rd (75%) instalment · FY 2026-27in 73 days
All due dates

Section 45 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932: Liability for Acts of Partners After Dissolution

Despite dissolution, the partners continue to be liable as such to third parties for any act done by any of them which would have been an act of the firm if done before...

Published
Updated
Reading time
7 min
Views
3
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Low Complexity
Topic
LLP & Partnership
Published
October 1, 2026
Last updated
Oct 3, 2026
Reading time
7 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

A firm that has been dissolved can still bind its former partners. Section 45 says the partners remain liable as partners to third parties for acts that would have been acts of the firm before dissolution, until public notice of the dissolution is given. If a dissolution dispute is on your hands, our legal dispute resolution service can help you read the position.

Section 45(1): the rule

The text says that, notwithstanding the dissolution of a firm, the partners continue to be liable as such to third parties for any act done by any of them that would have been an act of the firm if done before the dissolution, until public notice is given of the dissolution.

ElementText
EventA firm has been dissolved
Who stays liableThe partners, "as such" (as partners), to third parties
For whatAny act by any of them that would have been an act of the firm if done before dissolution
UntilPublic notice of the dissolution is given

In plain terms, a third party who dealt with the firm may not know it has been dissolved. Until public notice is given, a partner can still bind the others as if the firm were running. The same pattern appears for retirement in section 32(3).

The words "act ... which would have been an act of the firm if done before the dissolution" tie the liability to the usual test of whether the act is within a partner's authority as an agent of the firm; see sections 18 and 19.

Example. Four partners dissolve their firm on 31 March. No public notice is given. On 15 April, one of them places an order with a long-standing supplier for goods of a kind the firm always bought. Under 45(1), all four can still be liable as partners to that supplier for the order. After public notice, the same order would not bind the others.

The proviso: who is not liable

The proviso protects three categories. In each, the person is not liable under this section for acts done after the date on which he ceases to be a partner.

WhoCondition in the text
Estate of a partner who diesThe partner dies
Estate of a partner who is adjudicated an insolventHe is adjudicated insolvent
A partner who retires without having been known to be a partnerHe retires, and was not known to the person dealing with the firm to be a partner

Points to note:

  • The protection is against acts done after the date he ceases to be a partner.
  • It is a protection against liability under this section. It does not say that earlier acts of the firm, before the partner ceased to be one, stop binding him or his estate.
  • The third category reflects the same idea as the proviso to section 32(3): if a person never knew that someone was a partner, he cannot rely on the absence of notice against him. For the retirement rule in detail, see section 32.

Example. Mr Gill, a sleeping partner whose name has never appeared on the firm's documents and who has never been introduced to its suppliers, retires in January, and the firm is dissolved in March with no notice. A supplier who sells goods in April and never knew of Mr Gill cannot hold him liable under this section for that sale, as he retired without being known to be a partner.

Section 45(2): who may give notice

The copy consulted is garbled in this sub-section. It reads, in effect, "Notices under such - Section 91) may be given by any partner", where a sub-section reference has been mistyped. Read by sense, it provides that the notices contemplated may be given by any partner. The exact cross-reference should be checked in the official text. A related sub-section on notice appears in section 32(4) for retirement.

How is public notice given?

Section 45 does not say how public notice is to be given. The Act deals with the mode of public notice in section 72; see sections 72 to 74. A firm that is registered must also tell the Registrar about dissolution; see sections 62 and 63. Those are separate steps from public notice.

Link with winding up

Section 45 deals with liability to outsiders. How partners may act among themselves after dissolution to wind up is dealt with in sections 46 and 47. Under section 47, partners' authority continues after dissolution only so far as needed to wind up and finish unfinished transactions. Section 45 is the outsider's protection, and section 47 is the internal limit.

What can the deed change?

Section 45 does not contain "subject to contract" words. It protects third parties who dealt with the firm, so a private understanding between partners is not stated to remove it. Partners can, though, agree between themselves who bears the cost of a claim, and the deed may require the partners to give the notice promptly.

Practical points

  • Publish notice on the dissolution date, not weeks later.
  • Write directly to existing customers and suppliers as well; the text of section 45 refers to public notice, but a direct letter also removes later doubt about what the third party knew.
  • Keep proof of the notice given.
  • Record the dissolution with the Registrar if the firm is registered.

Need help with a dissolution claim?

If a third party has claimed against you for something done after the firm was dissolved, the date and form of public notice will matter. Our legal dispute resolution team can review the notice and the dealings and tell you where you stand. Please bring the dissolution deed, any notice published, and the claim itself.

Key takeaways

  • Dissolution does not end liability to third parties until public notice is given (45(1)).
  • The liability is for acts by any partner that would have been acts of the firm before dissolution.
  • The estate of a deceased or insolvent partner, and a retired partner not known to be a partner, are not liable under the section for acts after they cease to be partners.
  • Any partner may give the notice (45(2); the sub-section is garbled in the copy consulted).

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the text of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 as consulted on 1 October 2026. Several States have amended the registration chapter and make their own rules, forms and fees for the Registrar of Firms. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text and your State's rules before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Section 45

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Does dissolution end all liability to outsiders?

No. Until public notice of the dissolution is given, the partners continue to be liable as partners to third parties for acts that would have been acts of the firm.

Who is protected by the proviso?

The estate of a partner who dies, the estate of a partner adjudicated insolvent, and a partner who retires without having been known to the person dealing with the firm to be a partner.

A penalty is the visible cost of a delay; the lost time and credibility are the larger part.

— TaxClue Compliance Desk

Section 45: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
12,982 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

No. Until public notice of the dissolution is given, the partners continue to be liable as partners to third parties for acts that would have been acts of the firm.

The estate of a partner who dies, the estate of a partner adjudicated insolvent, and a partner who retires without having been known to the person dealing with the firm to be a partner.

The proviso speaks of acts done after the date he ceases to be a partner. It does not deal with earlier acts.

Under 45(2), any partner, read by sense; the copy consulted has a garbled cross-reference there.

Not in section 45. Section 72 deals with the mode of giving public notice.

The section has no "subject to contract" wording, so do not assume so. Partners can allocate the cost among themselves.