Next due
7 OCTTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Sep 2026in 2 days 11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 6 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 10 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 15 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 25 days 31 OCTITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27in 26 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 55 days 15 DECAdvance Tax · 3rd (75%) instalment · FY 2026-27in 71 days
All due dates

Section 28 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932: Holding Out

A person who, by words spoken or written or by conduct, represents himself, or knowingly permits himself to be represented, to be a partner is liable as a partner to anyone who...

Published
Updated
Reading time
7 min
Views
6
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Low Complexity
Topic
LLP & Partnership
Published
October 1, 2026
Last updated
Oct 4, 2026
Reading time
7 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Section 28 deals with "holding out". Anyone who represents himself, or knowingly permits himself to be represented, as a partner in a firm is liable as a partner to anyone who gave credit to the firm on the faith of that representation. Sub-section (2) adds that continuing to use a deceased partner's name in the firm name does not, by itself, make his estate liable.

Section 28(1): liability by holding out

The sub-section can be broken into parts. If you are facing a holding-out claim, our legal dispute resolution service can help assess it.

PartWhat the text says
WhoAnyone, whether or not he is truly a partner
ConductBy words spoken or written or by conduct, represents himself, or knowingly permits himself to be represented, to be a partner in a firm
RelianceThe other person has, on the faith of the representation, given credit to the firm
EffectThe person is liable as a partner in the firm to that other person
KnowledgeApplies whether or not the person representing himself or represented knows that the representation has reached the person giving credit

Who can be caught

"Anyone" means the sub-section is not limited to actual partners. It reaches a person who is not a partner at all, and a person who has left but still allows himself to be shown as one.

Two ways of holding out

  1. He represents himself as a partner, by words, in writing or by conduct, for example by signing letters as "Partner".
  2. He knowingly permits himself to be represented as a partner, for example by seeing his name on the firm's letterhead as a partner and doing nothing.

Reliance and credit

The liability is to anyone who has, on the faith of the representation, given credit to the firm. So the person must have relied on the representation and must have given credit. The text does not set out the full range of dealings that count as credit.

Knowledge that the representation reached the creditor

The sub-section applies whether or not the person held out knows that the representation has reached the person giving credit. It is enough that the representation was made or permitted and the creditor relied on it.

Example. Ritu retired from "Ritu & Co" last year but her name still appears as "Partner" on the firm's printed brochure. A supplier reads the brochure, finds her name, and supplies goods worth Rs 2 lakh on credit, relying on it. The supplier is not paid. Ritu, having knowingly permitted herself to be represented as a partner, can be held liable as a partner to that supplier.

Link with sections 20 and 25 to 27. Holding out is a separate source of liability from sections 25 to 27, which apply to actual partners; see sections 25 to 27. It also ties in with section 20, which turns partly on whether an outsider believed a person to be a partner; see sections 20 and 21.

Section 28(2): continuing the old firm name after a death

The second sub-section reads: where after a partner's death the business is continued in the old firm name, the continued use of that name or of the deceased partner's name as a part thereof shall not of itself make his legal representative or his estate liable for any act of the firm done after his death.

ElementText
EventA partner dies and the business continues in the old firm name
UseThe old name, or the deceased partner's name as a part of it, continues to be used
EffectThat use does not of itself make his legal representative or estate liable for any act of the firm done after his death

Points to note:

  • "Of itself". The mere use of the name is not enough. The text does not say that other facts could never create liability.
  • Only acts after the death. The sub-section covers acts of the firm done after his death. It does not discuss earlier acts.
  • Protects the family. The estate of a deceased partner is not drawn in just because the firm keeps trading under a familiar name, for example "Sharma Brothers".

Example. Sharma Brothers continue after Mr Sharma's death with the surviving partners using the same name. A supplier is not paid for goods ordered in the firm's name three months after his death. Under 28(2), the continued use of the name alone does not make his heirs liable for that debt.

What can the deed change?

Section 28 does not open with "subject to contract between the partners". It protects outsiders who relied on a representation, so a private agreement between partners is not stated to affect that protection. What a deed can do is set rules for how partners are shown in public and who must correct it.

Practical points

  • Update everything on exit: letterheads, websites, brochures and signboards, and tell customers and suppliers.
  • Object in writing if you are named as partner in material you did not authorise.
  • Do not describe non-partners as partners.
  • Retirement is dealt with in the next Chapter of the Act; see section 32.

Need help with a holding-out claim?

Holding-out claims often come up when a retired partner's name stays on documents, or a person is shown as a partner without being one. If you are facing such a claim or want to protect yourself after leaving a firm, our legal dispute resolution team can help.

Key takeaways

  • A person who represents himself, or knowingly permits himself to be represented, as a partner is liable as a partner to those who gave credit to the firm on the faith of it (28(1)).
  • It does not matter whether he knows the representation reached the person giving credit.
  • After a partner's death, continued use of the firm name or of his name does not of itself make his estate liable for later acts of the firm (28(2)).
  • Section 28 is not subject to contract between the partners.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the text of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 as consulted on 1 October 2026. Several States have amended the registration chapter and make their own rules, forms and fees for the Registrar of Firms. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text and your State's rules before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Section 28

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Can someone who is not a partner be liable as a partner?

Yes, under 28(1), if he represents himself, or knowingly permits himself to be represented, as a partner and a person gives credit to the firm on the faith of it.

Does a retired partner remain liable if his name stays on the letterhead?

He may be, if he knowingly permits himself to be represented as a partner and someone gives credit relying on it.

An LLP with no business in the year still has returns to file.

— TaxClue LLP & Partnership Desk

Section 28: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,327 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

Yes, under 28(1), if he represents himself, or knowingly permits himself to be represented, as a partner and a person gives credit to the firm on the faith of it.

He may be, if he knowingly permits himself to be represented as a partner and someone gives credit relying on it.

No. The sub-section applies whether or not the person knows that the representation has reached the creditor.

The liability is to anyone who has given credit "on the faith of" the representation, so reliance is part of the test.

Not of itself, under 28(2), for acts of the firm done after his death.

Section 28 is not stated to be subject to contract between the partners. Take steps to correct public representations.