Next due
11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 3 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 7 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 12 days 21 OCTTax Audit Report · Form 3CA/3CB · AY 2026-27 · extended from 30 Sepin 13 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 22 days 7 NOVTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Oct 2026in 30 days 21 NOVITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27 · extended from 31 Octin 44 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 52 days
All due dates

Sections 23 and 24 of the Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999: Registration as Prima Facie Evidence and Prohibition of Assignment

In all legal proceedings relating to a geographical indication, the certificate of registration, being a copy of the entry in the register under the seal of the Registry, is prima...

Published
Updated
Reading time
7 min
Views
11
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Medium Complexity
Topic
GI Registration
Published
October 1, 2026
Last updated
Oct 7, 2026
Reading time
7 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Section 23 makes the registration certificate prima facie evidence of validity in legal proceedings, admissible without further proof. Section 24 says a registered geographical indication cannot be assigned, transmitted, licensed, pledged or mortgaged, with one exception: on the death of an authorised user, his right devolves on his successor in title. Together they explain why a geographical indication is a collective, non-transferable asset, unlike a trade mark. If you are drafting group arrangements, a legal consultation can help you work within these limits.

Section 23(1): the certificate as evidence

The principal text reads: "In all legal proceedings relating to a geographical indication, the certificate of registration granted in this regard by the Registrar under this Act, being a copy of the entry in the register under the seal of the Geographical Indications Registry, shall be prima facie evidence of the validity thereof and be admissible in all courts and before the Appellate Board without further proof or production of the original."

The 2021 amendment, and a point the text does not resolve

The Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021 directs that in section 23, "for the words 'and before the Appellate Board before which', the words 'before whom' shall be substituted". Before the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021 the section referred to the Appellate Board. However, the words the amending Act tells us to replace ("and before the Appellate Board before which") do not appear in section 23(1) as printed in the principal text we consulted: the printed words are "and before the Appellate Board without further proof or production of the original". We therefore cannot show a clean, word-for-word reading of the amended sentence and do not invent one. What can be said with confidence is this: the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021 omits the definition of "Appellate Board" from section 2(1) and replaces references to it elsewhere with "High Court", and the certificate remains admissible in all courts "without further proof or production of the original". We flag the mismatch for the reader.

What the sub-section gives

ElementText
DocumentThe certificate of registration granted by the Registrar
Character"a copy of the entry in the register under the seal of the Geographical Indications Registry"
Weight"prima facie evidence of the validity thereof"
AdmissibilityIn all courts, "without further proof or production of the original"
Scope"In all legal proceedings relating to a geographical indication"

"Prima facie" means the certificate is taken as proof of validity unless it is displaced. The sub-section does not say how it can be displaced, but the Act provides for challenges to validity through rectification under section 27 and through the matters in section 48 and following when invalidity is pleaded. The certificate's issue and seal are in section 16(2) and section 5(4). See Section 16.

Example. In a dispute over false use of "Riverbend", the Society produces its sealed certificate, a copy of the register entry. The court accepts it without requiring the original register to be brought, and takes it as prima facie evidence that the registration is valid. The other side may still challenge validity by the means the Act allows.

Section 23(2): unregistered indications

"Nothing in this section shall be deemed to be affect the right of action in respect of an unregistered geographical indication." The printed text says "to be affect", a slip for "to affect". The sub-section matches the saving in section 20(2) for passing off. See Section 20. It means the evidentiary rule in sub-section (1) takes nothing away from rights of action concerning an unregistered indication.

Section 24: no assignment or licensing

"Notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force, any right to a registered geographical indication shall not be the subject matter of assignment, transmission, licensing, pledge, mortgage or any such other agreement:"

Proviso: "Provided that on the death of an authorised user his right in a registered geographical indication shall devolve on his successor in title under the law for the time being in force."

ProhibitedText
AssignmentTransfer to another person
TransmissionPassing of the right by any means
LicensingPermission to use granted by agreement
Pledge and mortgageSecurity over the right
"Any such other agreement"Catch-all for similar arrangements

Points to note:

  • The prohibition applies "notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force", so it overrides other laws.
  • It covers "any right to a registered geographical indication", not only the exclusive right of use.
  • The only exception is the proviso: devolution on death, and only for an authorised user. The text does not mention the death or dissolution of the registered proprietor.
  • The proviso says devolution is "on his successor in title under the law for the time being in force". The text does not say what the successor must then do, such as seek registration, and this article does not add anything.

Why this matters

A geographical indication is a collective right tied to a place. Section 24 stops it from being sold or leased to a company that is not part of the producing community. For a new producer, the route is registration as an authorised user under section 17, not a licence. See Section 17.

Example. The cooperative proposes to license "Hilltop weave" to a city exporter for a royalty. Section 24 prohibits licensing of any right to the registered indication. The exporter could not obtain rights by agreement; whether it could qualify as a producer and register as an authorised user is a question under sections 2(1)(k) and 17.

What the sections do not say

  • Section 23 does not say how validity can be rebutted.
  • Section 23 does not state any fee for a certified copy.
  • Section 24 does not say what happens to an agreement made in breach, though it says such rights "shall not be the subject matter" of it.
  • Section 24 does not address the death of a registered proprietor, only that of an authorised user.

Need help structuring group arrangements?

Because rights cannot be licensed or mortgaged, the structure of who is registered matters. Our team can advise through a legal consultation.

Key takeaways

  • The registration certificate, a sealed copy of the register entry, is prima facie evidence of validity and admissible without further proof or production of the original (section 23(1)).
  • Section 23(2) preserves rights of action for unregistered indications.
  • The Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021 directs a substitution in section 23, but the words it replaces do not appear in the printed text in that form.
  • Section 24 bars assignment, transmission, licensing, pledge, mortgage or similar agreements; the right of a deceased authorised user devolves on his successor in title.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999 read with the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021 and the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2023, as consulted on 1 October 2026. Forms, fees and procedure are set by the rules made under the Act. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Sections 23 and 24

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Is the certificate conclusive proof of validity?

No. Section 23(1) says prima facie evidence.

Do I need to produce the original register?

No. The certificate is admissible "without further proof or production of the original".

Reply to an examination report within time; an abandoned application helps nobody but your competitor.

— TaxClue IP Desk

Sections 23 and 24: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,350 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

No. Section 23(1) says prima facie evidence.

No. The certificate is admissible "without further proof or production of the original".

Section 24 prohibits licensing of any right to a registered geographical indication.

His right devolves on his successor in title under the law for the time being in force (proviso to section 24).

No. The proviso concerns an authorised user.

It directs replacement of the words "and before the Appellate Board before which" with "before whom". The printed text does not contain those exact words, so we quote it as printed and flag the point.