Next due
7 OCTTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Sep 2026in 3 days 11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 7 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 11 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 16 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 26 days 31 OCTITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27in 27 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 56 days 15 DECAdvance Tax · 3rd (75%) instalment · FY 2026-27in 72 days
All due dates

Section 25 of the Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999: Prohibition of Registration of a Geographical Indication as a Trade Mark

Notwithstanding anything in the Trade Marks Act, 1999, the Registrar of Trade Marks shall, suo motu or at the request of an interested party, refuse or invalidate the registration...

Published
Updated
Reading time
7 min
Views
8
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Medium Complexity
Topic
GI Registration
Published
October 1, 2026
Last updated
Oct 4, 2026
Reading time
7 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Section 25 protects geographical indications from the trade mark side. It directs the Registrar of Trade Marks, on his own motion or at the request of an interested party, to refuse or invalidate the registration of a trade mark that contains or consists of a geographical indication in two situations: where the goods do not come from the indicated place and the use would mislead, and where the indication identifies goods notified under section 22(2). If your name is being used in someone's trade mark application, a legal consultation can help you decide how to approach the Trade Marks Registry.

The text

"Notwithstanding anything contained in the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (47 of 1999), the Registrar of Trade Marks referred to in section 3 of that Act, shall, suo motu or at the request of an interested party, refuse or invalidate the registration of a trade mark which— (a) contains or consists of a geographical indication with respect to the goods or class or classes of goods not originating in the territory of a country, or a region or locality in that territory which such geographical indication indicates, if use of such geographical indications in the trade mark for such goods, is of such a nature as to confuse or mislead the persons as to the true place of origin of such goods or class or classes of goods; (b) contains or consists of a geographical indication identifying goods or class or classes of goods notified under sub-section (2) of section 22."

Who acts

The section places the duty on "the Registrar of Trade Marks referred to in section 3 of that Act", that is the Trade Marks Act, 1999. The Registrar of Trade Marks acts "suo motu" (on his own) or "at the request of an interested party". Note the section 3 of the GI Act makes the same Controller-General the Registrar of Geographical Indications, but section 25 speaks of the Registrar of Trade Marks, so the action is taken in the trade mark register. The text does not say how an "interested party" makes the request, and names no form or fee.

The two grounds

GroundWhat the trade mark doesExtra condition
(a)Contains or consists of a geographical indication, for goods not originating in the place the indication indicatesThe use of the indication in the trade mark for such goods must be "of such a nature as to confuse or mislead the persons as to the true place of origin"
(b)Contains or consists of a geographical indication identifying goods notified under section 22(2)None stated in clause (b) itself

Ground (a): misleading use for goods from elsewhere

Ground (a) has three parts. The trade mark contains or consists of a geographical indication. The goods covered by the trade mark do not originate in the place that indication indicates. And the use of that indication in the mark for those goods is of a nature that would confuse or mislead people about the true place of origin. All three must be present on the printed words.

Example. A company applies for a trade mark "Riverbend Gold" for tea, but its tea is grown in another state. If "Riverbend" is a geographical indication and the use in the trade mark would confuse or mislead persons about the tea's true origin, ground (a) is available to the Registrar of Trade Marks.

Ground (b): notified goods

Ground (b) refers to goods or classes of goods "notified under sub-section (2) of section 22". That sub-section lets the Central Government, by notification, specify goods for additional protection. Ground (b) contains no confusion test of its own: it speaks only of a trade mark that "contains or consists of a geographical indication identifying" such goods. The text does not say that the mark's goods must be of non-origin; it simply refers to the indication identifying notified goods. We read it as printed and do not add conditions. The notified goods are not listed in the text consulted. See Section 22 for the notification power.

"Refuse or invalidate"

The direction covers both stages: refuse registration at the application stage, and invalidate a registration already granted. The words "suo motu or at the request of an interested party" apply to both. The text does not give the procedure for either.

How it fits with section 26

Section 25 is the stopping provision. Section 26 is the protecting provision for some older or good-faith trade marks: it provides that nothing in the GI Act prejudices the registrability or validity of certain trade marks containing a geographical indication that were applied for or registered in good faith, or acquired through use in good faith before the commencement or before the date of filing the GI application, among other things. Read the two together: section 25 bars certain marks, and section 26 preserves others. See Section 26.

Section 2(2) of the GI Act says undefined words take their Trade Marks Act meaning, but section 25 stands on its own words.

Practical points

  1. Watch for trade marks that contain your indication. The text gives the interested party a right to request refusal or invalidation, so watch for marks that include your indication. The text does not set a time or procedure.
  2. Document the true origin. Ground (a) turns on the goods "not originating" in the indicated place and on likely confusion about origin.
  3. Know whether your goods are notified. Ground (b) depends on a notification under section 22(2).
  4. Check the five-year bar. Section 26(4) limits actions in connection with the use or registration of a trade mark after five years from when the infringement became known to the proprietor or authorised user, subject to conditions. This is explained in the article on section 26, and delay can be fatal.

What the section does not say

  • It does not say which forum hears a request, or give a form or fee.
  • It does not say who counts as an "interested party".
  • It does not list notified goods.
  • It does not say what happens to goods already sold under the mark.

Need help with a conflicting trade mark?

Whether a trade mark conflicts with your registered indication depends on goods, origin and notification. Our team can assess it and advise on a request to the Registrar of Trade Marks through a legal consultation.

Key takeaways

  • Section 25 operates notwithstanding the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
  • The Registrar of Trade Marks shall refuse or invalidate trade marks falling in clause (a) or (b), on his own motion or at the request of an interested party.
  • Clause (a): geographical indication on goods not originating in the indicated place, where use would confuse or mislead about the true origin.
  • Clause (b): geographical indication identifying goods notified under section 22(2).
  • Section 26 preserves certain good-faith and prior-use trade marks.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999 read with the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021 and the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2023, as consulted on 1 October 2026. Forms, fees and procedure are set by the rules made under the Act. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Section 25

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Who refuses or invalidates the trade mark?

The Registrar of Trade Marks referred to in section 3 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

Can I ask for it, or must he act alone?

Either. Section 25 says "suo motu or at the request of an interested party".

A licence should say what may be used, where, for how long and for how much — in that order of importance.

— TaxClue IP Desk

Section 25: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,327 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

The Registrar of Trade Marks referred to in section 3 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

Either. Section 25 says "suo motu or at the request of an interested party".

Yes. It says "refuse or invalidate the registration".

The printed clause (b) states no confusion condition. It speaks of an indication identifying goods notified under section 22(2).

The text consulted does not say.

Section 26 protects certain trade marks; read it with section 25.