Next due
7 OCTTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Sep 2026tomorrow 11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 5 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 9 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 14 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 24 days 31 OCTITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27in 25 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 54 days 15 DECAdvance Tax · 3rd (75%) instalment · FY 2026-27in 70 days
All due dates
FSSAI Live

Rule 3.1.2 of the FSS Rules, 2011: the order of the Adjudicating Officer

After the inquiry, the Adjudicating Officer either imposes a penalty (and/or suitable administrative action) by written order, or dismisses the case if the contravention is "not...

Published
Updated
Reading time
6 min
Views
9
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Medium Complexity
Topic
FSSAI
Published
September 30, 2026
Last updated
Oct 5, 2026
Reading time
6 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Rule 3.1.2 of the Food Safety and Standards Rules, 2011 governs the end of an adjudication: the order that imposes a penalty or dismisses the case, what it must say, how the penalty is paid, who gets a copy and how notices and orders are served. If you have received an order, the appeal clock may already be running. Our FSSAI penalty adjudication service can help you review it.

What the Adjudicating Officer can decide

Sub-ruleOutcome or requirement
1If satisfied that a person has become liable to penalty and/or any suitable administrative action under the sections in Rule 3.1.1(5), he may by written order impose such penalty as he thinks fit, in accordance with the relevant section
2If the contravention has "not been proved beyond doubt", he dismisses the case
3The order specifies the provisions of the Act, rules or regulations contravened and contains brief reasons; while imposing a monetary penalty he has due regard to section 49; the penalty is remitted by crossed demand draft on a nationalised bank in favour of "Adjudicating Officer, ……District", payable at his station
4The order is dated and signed
5A copy goes to the person(s) against whom the inquiry was held and to the Food Safety Officer who filed the application
6Manner of serving notices and orders

The sections in Rule 3.1.1(5) are 50 to 58, 61, 63, 64, 65, 66 and 67 (see Rule 3.1.1). For sections 61 and 63, the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2023 makes the consequence a penalty up to ten lakh rupees.

What "penalty as he thinks fit" means

The wording gives the officer room, but the room is limited. The penalty must be "in accordance with the provisions of the relevant section" of the Act, so the upper limit in that section applies, and section 49 sets the guidelines he must keep in view (see section 49 on penalty guidelines). An order that does not name the provision contravened or give reasons falls short of sub-rule 3.

Dismissal

Sub-rule 2 uses the words "not been proved beyond doubt". The Adjudicating Officer "shall dismiss the case". The Rules do not add a separate form of acquittal order.

Paying the penalty

The text of sub-rule 3 is specific: a crossed demand draft drawn on a nationalised bank, in favour of "Adjudicating Officer, ……District", payable at the place where that officer is located. The compendium does not mention any other mode for this payment, so read the order itself for payment instructions.

Serving notices and orders under sub-rule 6

A notice or order under these rules is served on the person against whom the proceedings were held in one of these ways, in order:

  1. Delivering or tendering it to the person or his duly authorised representative; or
  2. Registered post with acknowledgement due, to his place of residence or last known residence, or the place where he carries on or last carried on business, or personally works or last worked for gain; or
  3. If neither works, affixing it on the outer door or another conspicuous part of the premises where he resides or carries on business or works, with a written report witnessed by two persons.

This matters because the appeal period under Rule 3.3.1 runs from the date the copy of the order is received by the appellant. Keep the acknowledgement card, the courier or post receipt and a note of who received the order.

Practical examples

Example 1. A snack manufacturer is found to have contravened a section punishable with penalty. The order names the section, gives two lines of reasons, is dated and signed, and imposes a penalty within the section's limit. The manufacturer must pay by crossed demand draft.

Example 2. The Adjudicating Officer concludes that the analysis report does not prove the contravention beyond doubt. He dismisses the case, and the order is sent to the operator and to the Food Safety Officer.

Example 3. The operator has moved premises and the registered post comes back. The Adjudicating Officer may affix the order on the conspicuous part of the last known business premises and record a report witnessed by two persons. The operator should check the premises and the records for such a notice.

Need help reviewing an order?

When an Adjudicating Officer's order reaches you, you will want to check the section cited, the reasons, the penalty and the date of receipt before deciding what to do. TaxClue can help with that review and with the next steps through FSSAI penalty adjudication. Bring the complete order and the service envelope or receipt.

Key takeaways

  • The order is in writing, dated and signed.
  • It must name the provisions contravened and give brief reasons.
  • Section 49 must be kept in view when fixing the monetary penalty.
  • The penalty is paid by crossed demand draft in favour of the Adjudicating Officer.
  • A copy goes to the person and to the Food Safety Officer.
  • Service may be by delivery, registered post, or affixing with two witnesses.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 as enacted, read with the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2023 where it applies (ss.59, 61 and 63 only), and the FSS Rules, 2011 (compendium Version I of 1 April 2025). Verify current notifications, regulations and FSSAI orders before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About 2 of the FSS

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Can the Adjudicating Officer impose any amount he likes?

No. The penalty must accord with the relevant section, and he must have due regard to section 49.

What if the case is not proved?

He dismisses it. The text says the contravention must be proved, and uses the words "not been proved beyond doubt" for dismissal.

Display the licence where the law says it must be displayed; it is the simplest duty to meet.

— TaxClue Product Compliance Desk

2 of the FSS: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,327 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

No. The penalty must accord with the relevant section, and he must have due regard to section 49.

He dismisses it. The text says the contravention must be proved, and uses the words "not been proved beyond doubt" for dismissal.

By crossed demand draft on a nationalised bank in favour of the Adjudicating Officer of the district, payable at his station.

The person or persons against whom the inquiry was conducted and the Food Safety Officer who filed the application.

Only if delivery and registered post are not possible, and with a written report witnessed by two persons.

Yes. It must contain brief reasons (sub-rule 3).