Next due
7 OCTTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Sep 2026tomorrow 11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 5 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 9 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 14 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 24 days 31 OCTITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27in 25 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 54 days 15 DECAdvance Tax · 3rd (75%) instalment · FY 2026-27in 70 days
All due dates

Sections 80–81 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: conciliator in other proceedings and admissibility of evidence

Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the conciliator shall not act as an arbitrator or as a representative or counsel of a party in arbitral or judicial proceedings on the...

Published
Updated
Reading time
8 min
Views
7
Questions
7 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • High Complexity
  • In-Depth Guide
Topic
Arbitration
Published
October 2, 2026
Last updated
Oct 5, 2026
Reading time
8 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Applies to: FY 2026-27 (AY 2027-28)Verified against: Government sources

Section 80 keeps the conciliator out of later arbitral or judicial proceedings on the same dispute, as arbitrator, representative, counsel or witness, unless the parties agree otherwise. Section 81 stops the parties from relying on four kinds of conciliation material as evidence in arbitral or judicial proceedings. This follows the India Code consolidated text consulted.

The Mediation Act, 2023 and Part III

The India Code text consulted prints these sections. The Mediation Act, 2023 provides for sections 61 to 81 of this Act to be replaced by two sections. Its commencement is by notification, and the date is not in the sources consulted, so check whether that change is in force before relying on Part III. Our article on sections 58 to 61 of the Mediation Act, 2023 explains the amendments. The Mediation Act has its own provisions on admissibility and on the mediator's role; see our articles on section 23 of the Mediation Act, 2023 and sections 15 to 17.

Where these sections fit

Sections 80 and 81 close Part III. They deal with what happens after, or beside, the conciliation: who the conciliator may be in later proceedings, and what the parties may bring into those proceedings. They work with section 75 on confidentiality; see our article on section 75. If you are weighing what to say in conciliation and what might surface later in a dispute, our legal dispute resolution team can advise.

Section 80: role of the conciliator in other proceedings

Section 80 begins "Unless otherwise agreed by the parties," and then lists two restrictions.

ClauseRestriction on the conciliator
(a)Shall not act as an arbitrator or as a representative or counsel of a party in any arbitral or judicial proceeding in respect of a dispute that is the subject of the conciliation proceedings
(b)Shall not be presented by the parties as a witness in any arbitral or judicial proceedings

Reading section 80

  • The opening words let the parties agree otherwise. Both clauses sit under "Unless otherwise agreed by the parties". The text consulted does not say how or in what form that agreement is made.
  • Clause (a) is tied to the same dispute. The bar on acting as arbitrator, representative or counsel applies to proceedings "in respect of a dispute that is the subject of the conciliation proceedings".
  • Clause (b) is broader in words. The witness bar is expressed for "any arbitral or judicial proceedings", without repeating the words about the same dispute. We state it as printed.
  • Clause (b) restrains the parties: it is the parties who must not present the conciliator as a witness.

For comparison, the Mediation Act, 2023, in the article linked above, has its own rule that a mediator is not to act as arbitrator, counsel or witness; the same commencement caveat applies.

Section 81: admissibility of evidence in other proceedings

The parties shall not rely on or introduce as evidence in arbitral or judicial proceedings, whether or not such proceedings relate to the dispute that is the subject of the conciliation proceedings:

ClauseWhat cannot be relied on or introduced
(a)Views expressed or suggestions made by the other party in respect of a possible settlement of the dispute
(b)Admissions made by the other party in the course of the conciliation proceedings
(c)Proposals made by the conciliator
(d)The fact that the other party had indicated his willingness to accept a proposal for settlement made by the conciliator

Reading section 81

  1. It binds the parties. The words are "The parties shall not rely on or introduce as evidence".
  2. It covers "arbitral or judicial proceedings", related or not. The phrase "whether or not such proceedings relate to the dispute that is the subject of the conciliation proceedings" extends the bar beyond the same dispute.
  3. Clauses (a), (b) and (d) are about "the other party". They protect a party against its own statements, admissions and willingness being used by the opponent. Clause (c) is about the conciliator's proposals, with no reference to a party.
  4. The section is about reliance as evidence. It does not itself state what happens in conciliation or what the other party may do with the material in another way. The text consulted gives no further elaboration.

How sections 75, 80 and 81 divide the ground

ProvisionCoversDirected at
Section 75Confidentiality of all matters relating to the conciliation, including the settlement agreement (with an exception)The conciliator and the parties
Section 80The conciliator as arbitrator, representative, counsel or witnessThe conciliator, and the parties as to witnesses
Section 81Four kinds of material not to be relied on as evidenceThe parties

Where section 81 is named in the Act

Explanation 1 to section 34(2)(b), to section 48(2) and to section 57(1) each says an award is in conflict with the public policy of India only if, among other things, "the making of the award was induced or affected by fraud or corruption or was in violation of section 75 or section 81". The footnotes show these Explanations as substituted by Act 3 of 2016 (w.e.f. 23-10-2015). See our post on section 34 for the set-aside route. The text consulted does not describe how an award could be made in violation of section 81, and nothing is said here beyond the printed words.

Section 62(2) and the start of the bar

Sections 80 and 81 refer to "the conciliation proceedings", which commence under section 62(2) when the other party accepts the invitation in writing. See our article on sections 61 and 62.

An illustration

Nambiar Logistics and Pillai Traders have been through conciliation without a settlement. In the later arbitration, Nambiar's counsel wants to read out an admission Pillai made during a conciliation meeting and a figure the conciliator proposed. Under section 81(b) and (c) neither can be relied on or introduced as evidence. Nambiar also hopes to call the conciliator as a witness; section 80(b) says the parties shall not present the conciliator as a witness, unless otherwise agreed by the parties. Names and facts are invented.

Need help with a dispute that follows conciliation?

Sections 80 and 81 shape how you build the next stage of a dispute after conciliation has failed or has been left. Our legal dispute resolution team can help you separate what you may rely on from what you may not, and plan the arbitration or court case accordingly.

Key takeaways

  • Unless the parties agree otherwise, the conciliator cannot act as arbitrator, representative or counsel in proceedings on the same dispute (section 80(a)).
  • The parties cannot present the conciliator as a witness in any arbitral or judicial proceedings (section 80(b)).
  • Four kinds of conciliation material cannot be relied on or introduced as evidence: views and suggestions, admissions, conciliator's proposals, and willingness to accept a proposal (section 81).
  • Section 81 applies whether or not the later proceedings relate to the conciliated dispute.
  • "In violation of section 75 or section 81" is named in the Explanations to sections 34(2)(b), 48(2) and 57(1).
  • The Mediation Act, 2023 provides for replacement of sections 61 to 81; commencement by notification, date not in the sources consulted.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the India Code consolidated text of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, whose footnotes show amendments up to Act 3 of 2021 and a latest date of 12 October 2023, as consulted on 2 October 2026. Rules, regulations and notifications under the Act, later amendments and the commencement of the Mediation Act, 2023 should be checked. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Sections 80

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Can the conciliator later act as arbitrator?

Not in respect of the dispute that is the subject of the conciliation, unless the parties agree otherwise (section 80(a)).

Can the conciliator be called as a witness?

Section 80(b) says the conciliator shall not be presented by the parties as a witness in any arbitral or judicial proceedings, unless otherwise agreed by the parties.

When in doubt, read the provision itself rather than a summary of it — including this one.

— TaxClue Compliance Desk

Sections 80: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,327 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 7 questions readers ask most on this topic.

Not in respect of the dispute that is the subject of the conciliation, unless the parties agree otherwise (section 80(a)).

Section 80(b) says the conciliator shall not be presented by the parties as a witness in any arbitral or judicial proceedings, unless otherwise agreed by the parties.

Under section 81: the other party's views or suggestions on settlement, its admissions, the conciliator's proposals, and the fact that it indicated willingness to accept a proposal.

No. It applies to arbitral or judicial proceedings whether or not they relate to the dispute that was the subject of the conciliation.

Section 80 opens with "Unless otherwise agreed by the parties". Section 81 has no such opening words in the text consulted.

Explanation 1 to section 34(2)(b) lists, among the circumstances in which an award conflicts with public policy, one where its making was in violation of section 75 or section 81.

The text consulted prints it. The Mediation Act, 2023 provides for sections 61 to 81 to be replaced; commencement by notification, date not in the sources consulted. Check whether that change is in force.