Next due
7 OCTTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Sep 2026in 4 days 11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 8 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 12 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 17 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 27 days 31 OCTITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27in 28 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 57 days 15 DECAdvance Tax · 3rd (75%) instalment · FY 2026-27in 73 days
All due dates

Sections 38–39 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: deposits and lien on the arbitral award for costs

Under section 38, the tribunal may fix a deposit (and a supplementary deposit) as an advance for costs, payable in equal shares. If one side does not pay, the other may pay that...

Published
Updated
Reading time
8 min
Views
4
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • High Complexity
  • In-Depth Guide
Topic
Arbitration
Published
October 2, 2026
Last updated
Oct 2, 2026
Reading time
8 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Applies to: FY 2026-27 (AY 2027-28)Verified against: Government sources

Section 38 lets the arbitral tribunal ask the parties for an advance on its costs, to be paid in equal shares, and section 39 gives the tribunal a lien on the award for unpaid costs, with a Court application to break a standoff. Together they decide who funds the arbitration while it runs (our arbitration support page covers help with this) and what happens if the tribunal will not hand over the award until it is paid. This article follows the India Code consolidated text consulted.

Section 38: deposits

Sub-section (1): the tribunal fixes the deposit

The arbitral tribunal "may fix the amount of the deposit or supplementary deposit, as the case may be, as an advance for the costs referred to in sub-section (8) of section 31, which it expects will be incurred in respect of the claim submitted to it". The amount is fixed by the tribunal; the section sets no figure and no ceiling.

The first proviso adds that where a counter-claim has been submitted as well as the claim, the tribunal "may fix separate amount of deposit for the claim and counter-claim". So the respondent who counter-claims can face a separate deposit for that counter-claim.

The costs in section 31(8) are, as printed in the text consulted, costs fixed by the tribunal in accordance with section 31A. The Explanation printed after section 31(8) says "costs" means reasonable costs relating to the fees and expenses of the arbitrators and witnesses, legal fees and expenses, any administration fees of the institution supervising the arbitration, and any other expenses incurred in connection with the arbitral proceedings and the award. See our articles on section 31 and on the regime for costs in section 31A.

Sub-section (2): equal shares and what happens on default

The deposit "shall be payable in equal shares by the parties". Two provisos deal with non-payment:

  • First proviso: where one party fails to pay his share, "the other party may pay that share".
  • Second proviso: where the other party also does not pay the share in respect of the claim or counter-claim, the tribunal "may suspend or terminate the arbitral proceedings in respect of such claim or counter-claim, as the case may be".

The words "in respect of such claim or counter-claim" matter. The consequence is tied to the claim or counter-claim whose deposit is unpaid, not to the whole arbitration.

Sub-section (3): accounting and refund

On termination of the arbitral proceedings, the tribunal "shall render an accounting to the parties of the deposits received and shall return any unexpended balance to the party or parties, as the case may be". The section does not say in what proportion the balance is returned; the text is silent on that.

Section 39: lien and the Court's role

Sub-section (1): the lien

"Subject to the provisions of sub-section (2) and to any provision to the contrary in the arbitration agreement", the tribunal "shall have a lien on the arbitral award for any unpaid costs of the arbitration". Two limits are built in: the arbitration agreement can provide otherwise, and sub-section (2) applies.

Sub-section (2): application to the Court

If the tribunal "refuses to deliver its award except on payment of the costs demanded by it", the Court may, on an application, order that the tribunal "shall deliver the arbitral award to the applicant on payment into Court by the applicant of the costs demanded". The Court then, "after such inquiry, if any, as it thinks fit", orders that out of the money paid in there be paid to the tribunal "such sum as the Court may consider reasonable", and that the balance, if any, be refunded to the applicant.

Sub-section (3): who may apply

An application under sub-section (2) "may be made by any party unless the fees demanded have been fixed by written agreement between him and the arbitral tribunal". The tribunal is "entitled to appear and be heard" on the application. So a party who has signed a written fee agreement with the tribunal cannot use this route as to those fees, but a party who has not may.

Sub-section (4): costs where the award is silent

The Court "may make such orders as it thinks fit respecting the costs of the arbitration where any question arises respecting such costs and the arbitral award contains no sufficient provision concerning them". This is a residual power when the award itself does not deal adequately with costs.

Side by side: sections 38 and 39

PointSection 38Section 39
Who actsArbitral tribunalTribunal (lien); the Court (orders)
What it deals withAdvance deposit for costsUnpaid costs and delivery of the award
SharesEqual shares; the other party may pay a defaulting party's shareCourt decides the reasonable sum out of the money paid in
Consequence of defaultTribunal may suspend or terminate in respect of the claim or counter-claimTribunal may hold the award until costs are paid, subject to sub-section (2) and the agreement
Can the agreement change it?Not statedYes, the lien is subject to "any provision to the contrary in the arbitration agreement"

An example

Harbour Retail LLP claims Rs 40 lakh from Meridian Fabrics Pvt Ltd, and Meridian counter-claims. The tribunal fixes a deposit for the claim and a separate deposit for the counter-claim (first proviso to section 38(1)), each payable in equal shares. Meridian does not pay its share of the deposit for the claim. Harbour Retail pays that share too (first proviso to section 38(2)). Had neither paid, the tribunal could suspend or terminate the proceedings on that claim.

At the end, the tribunal declines to release the award until its demanded costs are paid. If no written fee agreement fixes those fees, Meridian or Harbour Retail may apply to the Court under section 39(2). The Court may order delivery on payment of the demanded costs into Court, and then decide what reasonable sum goes to the tribunal and what is refunded.

Related provisions

  • Section 31A gives the Court or the tribunal discretion on costs between the parties, which is a different matter from the tribunal's own costs claimed under sections 38 and 39.
  • Part III has a deposit provision for conciliation in section 79: the conciliator may direct each party to deposit an equal amount, and if the required deposits are not paid in full by both parties within thirty days, the conciliator may suspend the proceedings or make a written declaration of termination. Our article on costs and deposits in conciliation sets sections 78 and 79 out; check whether the Mediation Act, 2023 change to Part III is in force before relying on them.
  • Section 42 (the Court that hears later applications) is explained in our article on section 42.

Need help with deposits and costs in an arbitration?

If a tribunal has asked for a deposit or is holding an award for costs, the first questions are the arbitration agreement, any written fee agreement and the exact demand. Our arbitration support team can go through them with you and advise on the steps under sections 38 and 39.

Key takeaways

  • The tribunal may fix a deposit and supplementary deposit as an advance for costs, with a separate amount for a counter-claim.
  • The deposit is payable in equal shares; the other party may pay a defaulting party's share.
  • If neither side pays, the tribunal may suspend or terminate the proceedings in respect of that claim or counter-claim.
  • The tribunal has a lien on the award for unpaid costs, subject to the arbitration agreement and sub-section (2).
  • A party may apply to the Court for delivery of the award on payment of the demanded costs into Court, unless the fees were fixed by written agreement.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the India Code consolidated text of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, whose footnotes show amendments up to Act 3 of 2021 and a latest date of 12 October 2023, as consulted on 2 October 2026. Rules, regulations and notifications under the Act, later amendments and the commencement of the Mediation Act, 2023 should be checked. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Sections 38

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Who decides the amount of the deposit?

The arbitral tribunal. Section 38(1) lets it fix the deposit or supplementary deposit as an advance for the costs it expects to be incurred in respect of the claim submitted to it. The section gives no figure.

Who pays the deposit?

It is payable in equal shares by the parties. If one party does not pay his share, the other party may pay it.

A penalty is the visible cost of a delay; the lost time and credibility are the larger part.

— TaxClue Compliance Desk

Sections 38: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
11,561 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

The arbitral tribunal. Section 38(1) lets it fix the deposit or supplementary deposit as an advance for the costs it expects to be incurred in respect of the claim submitted to it. The section gives no figure.

It is payable in equal shares by the parties. If one party does not pay his share, the other party may pay it.

Under the second proviso to section 38(2), the tribunal may suspend or terminate the arbitral proceedings in respect of the claim or counter-claim for which the share is unpaid.

Section 39(1) gives the tribunal a lien on the award for unpaid costs, subject to sub-section (2) and any contrary provision in the arbitration agreement.

Apply to the Court under section 39(2). The Court may order delivery on payment into Court of the costs demanded, and then fix a reasonable sum for the tribunal and refund the balance to the applicant.

Yes. Under section 38(3), on termination the tribunal must give an accounting of the deposits received and return any unexpended balance to the party or parties. The section does not say how the balance is divided.