Next due
7 OCTTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Sep 2026in 4 days 11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 8 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 12 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 17 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 27 days 31 OCTITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27in 28 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 57 days 15 DECAdvance Tax · 3rd (75%) instalment · FY 2026-27in 73 days
All due dates

Sections 63-64 of the Indian Trusts Act, 1882: Following Trust Property into Third-party Hands and Saving of Transferees

Where trust property comes into a third person's hands inconsistently with the trust, the beneficiary may require him to admit formally, or may sue for a declaration, that the...

Published
Updated
Reading time
8 min
Views
3
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Medium Complexity
  • In-Depth Guide
Topic
Trust Registration
Published
October 1, 2026
Last updated
Oct 3, 2026
Reading time
8 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Section 63 lets a beneficiary follow trust property when it has gone into the hands of a third person inconsistently with the trust, or has been turned into other money or property that can still be traced. Section 64 then protects certain transferees, mainly those who took in good faith, for consideration and without notice of the trust. The Act deals with private trusts; public, charitable and religious trusts are governed by other laws (see private vs public trust). If trust property has gone astray and you want to trace it, our legal dispute resolution team can look at the papers with you.

Section 63: two kinds of following

1. Property in a third person's hands. The first paragraph reads: "Where trust-property comes into the hands of a third person inconsistently with the trust, the beneficiary may require him to admit formally, or may institute a suit for a declaration, that the property is comprised in the trust."

The beneficiary has two routes: ask the holder to admit it, or sue for a declaration. The key words are "inconsistently with the trust". Property that reaches a third person in a way the trust allows does not fall under this paragraph.

2. What the trust property was turned into. The second paragraph reads: "Where the trustee has disposed of trust-property and the money or other property which he has received therefor can be traced in his hands, or the hands of his legal representative or legatee, the beneficiary has, in respect thereof, rights as nearly as may be the same as his rights in respect of the original trust-property."

If the trustee sold a trust asset and the sale money, or something bought with it, can still be traced, the beneficiary's rights follow into it. The paragraph names three possible holders: the trustee, his legal representative and his legatee. The section does not define "traced" or lay down a method of tracing; the text is silent, and the facts of each case decide.

Section 64: transferees who are protected

Section 64 begins: "Nothing in Section 63 entitles the beneficiary to any right in respect of property in the hands of" (a) "a transferee in good faith for consideration without having notice of the trust, either when the purchase-money was paid, or when the conveyance was executed; or" (b) "a transferee for consideration from such a transferee."

PersonProtected under section 64?
Transferee in good faith, for consideration, without notice of the trustYes
Transferee for consideration from such a protected transfereeYes
A transferee who knew of the trustThe section gives no protection
A transferee who paid nothingThe section gives no protection; consideration is required
A judgment-creditor of the trustee who attaches and buys trust propertyNot a transferee for consideration within the section

The section adds a second paragraph on that last point: "A judgment-creditor of the trustee attaching and purchasing trust-property is not a transferee for consideration within the meaning of this section."

The notice test has two moments: "either when the purchase-money was paid, or when the conveyance was executed". The section does not explain how the two moments interact; the words should be read as printed, and the official text checked for fine points.

A final paragraph says: "Nothing in Section 63 applies to money currency notes and negotiable instruments in the hands of a bona fide holder to whom they have passed in circulation, or shall be deemed to affect the Indian Contract Act, 1872, Section 108, or the liability of a person to whom a debt or charge is transferred." The OCR of the opening phrase is run together ("money currency notes"); it appears to list money, currency notes and negotiable instruments, but check the official text. The section also names section 108 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 as printed.

The Act's own illustrations

The Act gives two illustrations under section 63. In plain words:

  1. Illustration (a). A, a trustee for B of Rs 10,000, wrongfully invests the Rs 10,000 in the purchase of certain land. B is entitled to the land.
  2. Illustration (b). A, a trustee, wrongfully purchases land in his own name, partly with his own money and partly with money subject to a trust for B. B is entitled to a charge on the land for the amount of the trust money so misemployed.

The first shows the whole fund traced into land. The second shows a mixed purchase, where the beneficiary gets a charge on the land for the trust money, not the whole land. For deliberate mingling of funds, see section 66 in sections 65-67.

A modern example of our own

Farhan Qureshi is trustee of a trust for his late brother's daughter, Zoya. He sells a trust-owned flat in Lucknow for Rs 60 lakh and uses the money to buy a shop in his own name.

  • Under the second paragraph of section 63, the sale money was received for trust property and, being traceable into the shop, Zoya has rights in the shop as nearly as may be the same as in the flat, in line with the Act's illustration (a).
  • If Farhan instead sold the flat to a buyer who knew it was trust property, the first paragraph lets Zoya ask that buyer to admit formally, or sue for a declaration, that the flat is comprised in the trust.
  • If the buyer was a stranger who paid full value in good faith and knew nothing of the trust, section 64 protects him, and so it would protect a person who then bought from him for consideration.
  • If a creditor of Farhan attached and bought the flat in execution of a judgment, section 64 says he is not a transferee for consideration within the section.

What the instrument of trust can change

Sections 63 and 64 do not mention the instrument of trust, and the text does not say that a deed can alter them. They protect people outside the trust, such as buyers, who are not parties to the deed, so a deed cannot easily bind them. Take advice if a deed purports to restrict following of property.

Practical points

  • Beneficiaries: if you suspect trust property was sold or converted, collect the sale papers and bank records quickly, because tracing depends on documents.
  • Buyers from trustees: ask for the trust deed and check the trustee's power of sale. Notice of the trust takes away the protection of section 64.
  • Trustees: keep trust money in a separate account so that it can always be identified; see liabilities of trustees.

Need help tracing trust property?

If trust property has been sold on, or trust money used to buy something else, the deed, the sale papers and the bank statements are the starting point. Our legal dispute resolution team can read them and advise on a declaration or a claim over what the property became.

Key takeaways

  • Section 63: a beneficiary may require a third person holding trust property inconsistently with the trust to admit formally, or sue for a declaration, that it is comprised in the trust.
  • Where the sale money or other property can be traced in the hands of the trustee, his legal representative or his legatee, the beneficiary has rights as nearly as may be the same as in the original property.
  • Section 64 protects a transferee in good faith for consideration without notice, and a transferee for consideration from him.
  • A judgment-creditor who attaches and buys trust property is not such a transferee.
  • The Act's two illustrations show tracing into land: the whole land, or a charge where funds are mixed.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the text of the Indian Trusts Act, 1882 as consulted on 1 October 2026 from a scanned copy; the Act applies to private trusts, and public, charitable and religious trusts are governed by other laws. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text and take advice before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Sections 63-64

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Can a beneficiary recover trust property from a third person?

Section 63 lets him require the holder to admit formally, or sue for a declaration, that the property is comprised in the trust, where it came to him inconsistently with the trust.

Can the beneficiary follow the money if the trustee sold the property?

Yes, if the money or other property received can be traced in the hands of the trustee, his legal representative or his legatee.

A charity's exemption rests on its records — what was received, from whom, and how it was applied.

— TaxClue NGO & Trust Desk

Sections 63-64: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
11,561 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

Section 63 lets him require the holder to admit formally, or sue for a declaration, that the property is comprised in the trust, where it came to him inconsistently with the trust.

Yes, if the money or other property received can be traced in the hands of the trustee, his legal representative or his legatee.

A transferee in good faith for consideration without notice of the trust, and a transferee for consideration from such a transferee.

Section 64 says a judgment-creditor of the trustee attaching and purchasing trust property is not a transferee for consideration within the section.

The Act's illustration (b) says the beneficiary is entitled to a charge on the land for the amount of the trust money misemployed.

Section 64 says section 63 does not apply to such things in the hands of a bona fide holder to whom they passed in circulation. The OCR of that line is rough, so check the official text.