Next due
7 OCTTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Sep 2026in 4 days 11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 8 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 12 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 17 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 27 days 31 OCTITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27in 28 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 57 days 15 DECAdvance Tax · 3rd (75%) instalment · FY 2026-27in 73 days
All due dates

Section 4 of the Indian Trusts Act, 1882: Lawful Purpose of a Trust

A trust may be created for any lawful purpose. A purpose is not lawful if it is forbidden by law, would defeat the provisions of any law, is fraudulent, involves injury to the...

Published
Updated
Reading time
7 min
Views
7
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Medium Complexity
Topic
Trust Registration
Published
October 1, 2026
Last updated
Oct 3, 2026
Reading time
7 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Section 4 says a trust may be created for any lawful purpose, and then lists when a purpose is not lawful. A trust whose purpose is unlawful is void, and where one trust has a lawful and an unlawful purpose that cannot be separated, the whole trust is void. If you are drafting the purpose clause of a family trust, our agreement drafting team can help you word it clearly.

The text

The section opens: "A trust may be created for any lawful purpose." It then says the purpose "is lawful unless it is (a) forbidden by law, or (b) is of such a nature that, if permitted, it would defeat the provisions of any law, or (c) is fraudulent, or (d) involves or implies injury to the person or property of another, or (e) the Court regards it as immoral or opposed to public policy."

The second paragraph says: "Every trust of which the purpose is unlawful is void. And where a trust is created for two purposes, of which one is lawful and the other unlawful, and the two purposes cannot be separated, the whole trust is void."

This article is about private trusts. The Act deals with private trusts, and public, charitable and religious trusts are governed by other laws; see private trust vs public trust for the difference.

The five tests, limb by limb

LimbPlain meaning
(a) Forbidden by lawA statute or rule prohibits the thing the trust is meant to do
(b) Would defeat the provisions of any lawThe trust is not forbidden outright, but if allowed it would undo what a law is meant to achieve
(c) FraudulentThe purpose is to deceive or cheat
(d) Injury to the person or property of anotherThe trust involves or implies harm to someone's body or property
(e) Immoral or opposed to public policy, in the Court's viewThe Court decides; the Act leaves this to the Court

Note the wording of (d): "involves or implies". The harm need not be stated in the deed. It is enough if the purpose, fairly read, carries that implication.

Severability: one lawful and one unlawful purpose

If a deed has two purposes, one lawful and one not, the question is whether they can be separated. The text says that if "the two purposes cannot be separated, the whole trust is void". The section does not say what happens when they can be separated. It is silent on that point, so a deed should not rely on any assumption; keep lawful purposes in a clean, stand-alone clause and do not blend them with anything doubtful.

The Explanation: foreign immovable property

The section carries an Explanation: "the expression 'law' includes, where the trust-property is immovable and situate in a foreign country, the law of such country." So where the trust property is immovable property in another country, the lawfulness test looks to that country's law too.

The Act's own illustrations

The Act gives three illustrations, which we restate in plain words:

  • (a) A transfers property to B in trust to apply the profits to the upbringing of female foundlings to be trained as prostitutes. The trust is void.
  • (b) A leaves property by will to B in trust to run a smuggling business and, out of the profits, support A's children. The trust is void.
  • (c) A, while in insolvent circumstances, transfers property to B in trust for A during his life and after his death for B. A is declared an insolvent. The trust for A is invalid as against his creditors.

Illustration (c) is a useful reminder that a trust set up by someone already in financial trouble can be attacked by creditors. The text records the result as invalidity "as against his creditors".

A modern example of our own

Kavita Rao creates a trust and transfers a commercial shop to her cousin Nitin as trustee, with the stated purpose that the rent will pay for her grandchildren's school fees. The purpose is lawful. Now suppose a second clause tells Nitin to use part of the rent to pay a person to damage a neighbour's property. That second purpose "involves injury to the property of another" and is unlawful. Whether the whole trust fails turns on whether the two purposes can be separated; if the clauses are woven together so that they cannot be, section 4 says the whole trust is void. If the deed keeps them apart, the text of section 4 does not say in terms what follows, and the question needs advice on the actual deed.

A second example: Vivek, owing large sums to lenders, transfers his only flat to a trust for his daughter just before the lenders sue. Illustration (c) shows the risk: a trust created in insolvent circumstances for the settlor's own benefit is invalid as against creditors.

What the instrument of trust can change

Section 4 does not say "subject to the instrument of trust". The lawfulness test applies to the purpose whatever the deed says. A deed cannot make an unlawful purpose lawful by describing it kindly. What the deed controls is the choice of lawful purposes and how clearly they are stated.

Practical points

  • Settlors: state each purpose in plain words and test it against the five limbs before signing.
  • Trustees: if you suspect the deed carries a purpose that is unlawful, take advice before acting on it; section 4 says such a trust is void.
  • Advisers: check the settlor's financial position at the time of creation, as illustration (c) shows.
  • Registration and tax: these are separate subjects; see our income-tax guides, and note that registration of deeds depends on other laws.

Need help drafting a clear purpose clause?

A well-worded purpose clause avoids disputes later. Our agreement drafting service can prepare or review a private trust deed so that each purpose is stated plainly and kept separate. Bring your draft and a note of the people who are to benefit.

Key takeaways

  • A trust may be created for any lawful purpose (s.4).
  • A purpose is not lawful if forbidden by law, defeating any law, fraudulent, injurious to another's person or property, or immoral or against public policy in the Court's view.
  • An unlawful trust is void; if lawful and unlawful purposes cannot be separated, the whole trust is void.
  • For foreign immovable property, "law" includes that country's law.
  • The Act's illustrations show void trusts and a trust invalid as against creditors.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the text of the Indian Trusts Act, 1882 as consulted on 1 October 2026 from a scanned copy; the Act applies to private trusts, and public, charitable and religious trusts are governed by other laws. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text and take advice before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Section 4

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

What makes a trust purpose unlawful under section 4?

It is forbidden by law, would defeat any law, is fraudulent, involves injury to another's person or property, or is regarded by the Court as immoral or opposed to public policy.

What happens to a trust with an unlawful purpose?

The section says it is void.

Good compliance is boring by design; the drama starts only when something has been skipped.

— TaxClue Compliance Desk

Section 4: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
12,191 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

It is forbidden by law, would defeat any law, is fraudulent, involves injury to another's person or property, or is regarded by the Court as immoral or opposed to public policy.

The section says it is void.

If the two cannot be separated, the whole trust is void. The text does not say what follows if they can be separated.

Illustration (c) says a trust for the settlor's own life, made while insolvent and followed by an insolvency declaration, is invalid as against his creditors.

The Explanation says "law" includes the law of a foreign country where the trust property is immovable property situated there.

Limb (e) says the Court regards it as such; the Act leaves that judgment to the Court.