Next due
7 OCTTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Sep 2026in 3 days 11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 7 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 11 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 16 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 26 days 31 OCTITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27in 27 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 56 days 15 DECAdvance Tax · 3rd (75%) instalment · FY 2026-27in 72 days
All due dates

Section 62 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872: Novation, Rescission and Alteration of Contract

If the parties to a contract agree to substitute a new contract for it, or to rescind or alter it, the original contract need not be performed. The word is "agree": the change...

Published
Updated
Reading time
6 min
Views
4
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Medium Complexity
Topic
Contract Law
Published
October 1, 2026
Last updated
Oct 3, 2026
Reading time
6 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Section 62 is a single sentence with a large effect: if the parties to a contract agree to substitute a new contract for it, or to rescind it, or to alter it, the original contract need not be performed. It is the section behind most contract amendments, restatements and changes of debtor. If you are restructuring a deal, a properly drawn agreement makes clear what is replaced and what survives.

What the section says

"If the parties to a contract agree to substitute a new contract for it, or to rescind or alter it, the original contract need not be performed."

Three routes are named, and each needs the agreement of the parties.

RoutePlain meaningEffect under s.62
Substitute a new contract (commonly called novation)A new contract takes the place of the old oneThe original contract need not be performed
RescindThe parties agree to cancel the contractThe original contract need not be performed
AlterThe parties agree to change its termsThe original contract (as it stood) need not be performed

The section does not use the word "novation"; it speaks of agreeing "to substitute a new contract". Likewise, the section does not say what form the agreement must take or what it needs by way of consideration. It states only the result: "the original contract need not be performed".

Notice who must agree. The text says "the parties to a contract". If a new party is to be brought in, the Act's illustration (a) shows all three persons agreeing.

The Act's illustrations

IllustrationFactsResult
(a)A owes money to B under a contract. A, B and C agree that B shall thenceforth accept C as his debtor, instead of A.The old debt of A to B is at an end, and a new debt from C to B has been contracted.
(b)A owes B Rs. 10,000. A and B arrange that A gives B a mortgage of his estate for Rs. 5,000 in place of the debt of Rs. 10,000.This is a new contract and extinguishes the old.
(c)A owes B Rs. 1,000 under a contract. B owes C Rs. 1,000. B orders A to credit C with Rs. 1,000 in his books, but C does not assent.B still owes C Rs. 1,000, and no new contract has been entered into.

Illustration (a) is the classic change of debtor, with all three persons agreeing. Illustration (c) shows the limit: where one of the persons whose agreement is needed (C) does not assent, nothing is substituted.

A modern example (ours)

Pioneer Print has a one-year contract to supply brochures to Quartz Hotels at Rs. 10 a copy. After six months, Pioneer, Quartz and a new group company, Quartz Hospitality LLP, sign a short letter: from 1 July, Quartz Hospitality will be the customer, and the price will be Rs. 12 a copy. Under s.62 the original contract with Quartz Hotels need not be performed, because the parties agreed to substitute a new contract. If instead Quartz Hotels alone told Pioneer "send the bills to the LLP from now on", and Pioneer never agreed, the Act's illustration (c) suggests that no new contract has been made.

What can the parties change?

The section is itself a statement of what parties can do by agreement. A contract can also say how it may be varied, for example "no change is valid unless in writing and signed by both parties". The text of s.62 does not address such clauses and does not require writing; it says "agree".

Practical points

  • Say what is replaced. Use words like "this agreement replaces the earlier agreement dated ..." and list what carries over (security, guarantees, notice periods).
  • Get every affected person to sign, including any third person whose rights or liabilities change. Illustration (c) shows what happens if one does not assent.
  • Alter in writing, even though the section does not require it, so there is proof of the agreed change.
  • Check security and guarantees. A guarantor's position can change if the main contract changes; our overview of indemnity and guarantee explains where to read further.
  • Update stamping and registrations as advised; see our guides, as this article gives no figures.
  • For a promisee who simply gives up or reduces a claim, see sections 63 to 65.

Need help amending or restating a contract?

Changing a customer, a price or a schedule midway through a contract needs a clear document that all affected parties sign. Our agreement drafting service can prepare a novation, amendment or termination agreement that says exactly what stays and what goes. Share the original and a summary of the change you want.

Key takeaways

  • If the parties agree to substitute a new contract, or to rescind or alter the old one, the original need not be performed.
  • The change must be agreed by the parties; the Act's illustration (c) shows no new contract where a necessary person did not assent.
  • A new debtor can replace the old one if all three agree (illustration (a)).
  • A mortgage in place of a larger debt can be a new contract that extinguishes the old (illustration (b)).
  • The section does not mention form; put changes in writing anyway.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the text of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 as consulted on 1 October 2026. Many questions under this Act turn on case law and on the wording of the particular contract, which this article does not cover. It is general information, not legal advice; check the official text and take advice before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Section 62

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Does section 62 use the word "novation"?

No. The words are "substitute a new contract". Novation is the label commonly used for this.

Can one party alter a contract alone?

The section requires that "the parties" agree.

A penalty is the visible cost of a delay; the lost time and credibility are the larger part.

— TaxClue Compliance Desk

Section 62: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
12,982 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

No. The words are "substitute a new contract". Novation is the label commonly used for this.

The section requires that "the parties" agree.

In the Act's illustration (a), A, B and C all agree. In (c), the arrangement did not create a new contract because C did not assent.

The section does not say. Written proof is sensible.

The original contract need not be performed, and in illustrations (a) and (b) the old debt is at an end.

Sections 63 to 67 deal with remission, rescission of voidable contracts and related rules; see our other articles in the series.