Next due
7 OCTTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Sep 2026in 4 days 11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 8 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 12 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 17 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 27 days 31 OCTITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27in 28 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 57 days 15 DECAdvance Tax · 3rd (75%) instalment · FY 2026-27in 73 days
All due dates

Sections 9-10 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930: how the price is ascertained and what happens when a third-party valuation fails

The price may be fixed by the contract, left to be fixed in a manner agreed, or determined by the course of dealing between the parties. If it is not determined in any of these...

Published
Updated
Reading time
8 min
Views
11
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Medium Complexity
  • In-Depth Guide
Topic
Contract Law
Published
October 2, 2026
Last updated
Oct 3, 2026
Reading time
8 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

A contract of sale needs a price, but it does not always state one at the outset. Section 9 lists the ways the price may be fixed and, failing those, requires "a reasonable price". Section 10 deals with an agreement to sell at a price to be fixed by a third party's valuation, and with what happens if the valuer cannot or does not value the goods.

Reading note

This article follows the consolidated text of the Act consulted (latest amendment shown: Act 28 of 1993); later amendments should be checked in the official text. "Price" is defined in section 2(10) as "the money consideration for a sale of goods"; see our article on the section 2 definitions. Sections 9 and 10 sit under the sub-heading "The price" in Chapter II. A price clause that is vague is the commonest source of dispute, so it is worth settling it in the contract through proper agreement drafting.

Section 9(1): three ways to fix the price

"The price in a contract of sale may be fixed by the contract or may be left to be fixed in manner thereby agreed or may be determined by the course of dealing between the parties."

Way of fixingMeaning in plain words
Fixed by the contractthe contract states the price or a method that produces it
Left to be fixed in manner thereby agreedthe contract names a way (for example, a rate list or an index) and the price follows from it
Determined by the course of dealingthe earlier dealings between these parties set the price

The wording "left to be fixed in manner thereby agreed" means the manner must come from the contract itself. "Course of dealing between the parties" is a third source and refers to the way these parties have dealt before.

Example (the writer's own, not printed in the Act): Chopra Dairy has supplied milk powder to Hira Sweets every month for years at the rate in the previous invoice. This month's order does not mention a rate. The earlier dealings may fix the price under section 9(1).

Section 9(2): a reasonable price

"Where the price is not determined in accordance with the foregoing provisions, the buyer shall pay the seller a reasonable price. What is a reasonable price is a question of fact dependent on the circumstances of each particular case."

Three points:

  • It applies only where the price is not determined by the contract, the agreed manner or the course of dealing.
  • The buyer "shall pay" a reasonable price. A contract is not left without a price.
  • The text does not define a reasonable price. It says only that it is "a question of fact dependent on the circumstances of each particular case". This article gives no formula, because the section gives none.

Example (the writer's own): Dev Garments orders ten rolls of a special fabric by telephone from Lal Textiles. No rate is mentioned, and the parties have not dealt before. Under section 9(2) Dev Garments must pay a reasonable price, and what is reasonable will depend on the circumstances.

Even so, an ambiguous price clause is safer replaced by a fixed rate or a clear formula.

Section 10(1): agreement to sell at valuation

"Where there is an agreement to sell goods on the terms that the price is to be fixed by the valuation of a third party and such third party cannot or does not make such valuation, the agreement is thereby avoided."

Notice the opening words: it speaks of an agreement to sell, the category in section 4(3), where the property is to pass later. The two failures are in the words "cannot or does not": the valuer may be unable, or may simply not do it. In either case the agreement is "avoided".

The proviso

"Provided that, if the goods or any part thereof have been delivered to, and appropriated by, the buyer, he shall pay a reasonable price therefor."

Two things must have happened: the goods (or part of them) must be delivered to the buyer, and appropriated by him. Then the buyer pays a reasonable price for those goods or that part. The proviso does not define "appropriated"; the word is used again in sections 23 and 24, which are explained in later articles.

Example (the writer's own): Prakash Orchards agrees to sell its apple harvest to Mehta Fruit Co. at the price an independent valuer, Mr. Rao, will fix. Mr. Rao falls ill and cannot value the crop. The agreement is avoided. But if Mehta Fruit Co. had already taken delivery of part of the apples and used them, it must pay a reasonable price for that part.

Section 10(2): valuer prevented by fault

"Where such third party is prevented from making the valuation by the fault of the seller or buyer, the party not in fault may maintain a suit for damages against the party in fault."

"Fault" is defined in section 2(5) as "wrongful act or default". If, for example, one side keeps the valuer away from the goods, the other side, which is not in fault, may sue for damages. The text names only the right to sue for damages; it does not set a measure. For the general law of compensation for breach, see Section 73 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. That law applies to sales of goods under section 3 of this Act so far as it is not inconsistent.

Comparison of sections 9 and 10

PointSection 9Section 10
Kind of contractcontract of sale generallyagreement to sell with price fixed by a third party's valuation
When it applieswhenever the price is to be ascertainedwhen a third party cannot or does not value
Consequencereasonable price if not otherwise determinedagreement avoided; reasonable price if goods delivered and appropriated
Remedy for obstructionnot coveredparty not in fault may sue for damages

Practical drafting points

  • State the price or the formula. Do not rely on a "reasonable price" as a convenience: it is a question of fact on the circumstances.
  • If a valuer is to fix the price, name the valuer, a substitute, a time limit and who pays the fee. The Act's rule on failure is the fallback, not the plan.
  • Keep invoices and rate lists. They show the course of dealing.
  • Where the goods have been delivered before the price is fixed, record that they are appropriated by the buyer, because the proviso to section 10(1) depends on it.

Need help with price clauses?

If price clauses, rate schedules or valuation terms in your supply contract are loosely worded, we can draft or tighten the agreement so that the price is fixed by a method both sides can follow.

Key takeaways

  • The price may be fixed by the contract, by a manner agreed in it, or by the course of dealing.
  • Otherwise the buyer pays a reasonable price; what is reasonable is a question of fact.
  • If a third-party valuation fails, the agreement to sell is avoided.
  • If goods have been delivered to and appropriated by the buyer, a reasonable price is payable.
  • A party not in fault may sue for damages if the other party's fault prevents the valuation.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the consolidated text of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 consulted on 2 October 2026, whose latest amendment shown is Act 28 of 1993. It explains the words of the statute only; later amendments and the way courts apply these sections should be checked. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Sections 9-10

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

What if the contract does not state a price?

Section 9(1) allows the price to be fixed in an agreed manner or by the course of dealing; failing that, section 9(2) requires the buyer to pay a reasonable price.

Who decides what a reasonable price is?

The section says it is "a question of fact dependent on the circumstances of each particular case". It does not name a person or a formula.

A contract is written for the day the parties disagree.

— TaxClue Legal Desk

Sections 9-10: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
12,982 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

Section 9(1) allows the price to be fixed in an agreed manner or by the course of dealing; failing that, section 9(2) requires the buyer to pay a reasonable price.

The section says it is "a question of fact dependent on the circumstances of each particular case". It does not name a person or a formula.

Section 10(1) says the agreement is thereby avoided, with a proviso for goods already delivered to and appropriated by the buyer.

A reasonable price for the goods or the part delivered and appropriated (proviso to section 10(1)).

Yes, section 10(2) allows the party not in fault to maintain a suit for damages against the party in fault.

The text does not define it; it simply lists it as one of the ways the price may be determined.