Next due
11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 3 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 7 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 12 days 21 OCTTax Audit Report · Form 3CA/3CB · AY 2026-27 · extended from 30 Sepin 13 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 22 days 7 NOVTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Oct 2026in 30 days 21 NOVITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27 · extended from 31 Octin 44 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 52 days
All due dates
Copyright Live

Sections 61–62 of the Copyright Act, 1957: Owner as Party and Jurisdiction of Court

Section 61: in a suit by an exclusive licensee, the owner is made a defendant unless the court otherwise directs, and may dispute the claim; if the suit succeeds, the owner cannot...

Published
Updated
Reading time
6 min
Views
6
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Medium Complexity
Topic
Copyright
Published
October 1, 2026
Last updated
Oct 8, 2026
Reading time
6 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Section 61 deals with a suit brought by an exclusive licensee: the copyright owner is made a defendant and, if the suit succeeds, cannot sue afresh on the same cause of action. Section 62 says where a civil suit under the Chapter is filed: the district court having jurisdiction, which includes the court where the plaintiff actually and voluntarily resides, carries on business or personally works for gain. For planning a filing, our legal dispute resolution team can advise.

Section 61: the owner and the exclusive licensee

Sub-section (1). "In every civil suit or other proceeding regarding infringement of copyright instituted by an exclusive licensee, the owner of the copyright shall, unless the court otherwise directs, be made a defendant and where such owner is made a defendant, he shall have the right to dispute the claim of the exclusive licensee."

ElementText
Who suesAn exclusive licensee (an "owner" for this Chapter under section 54)
Who is joinedThe owner of the copyright, as a defendant
Exception"Unless the court otherwise directs"
Owner's rightTo dispute the claim of the exclusive licensee

Sub-section (2). "Where any civil suit or other proceeding regarding infringement of copyright instituted by an exclusive licensee is successful, no fresh suit or other proceeding in respect of the same cause of action shall lie at the instance of the owner of the copyright." The section protects the infringer from being sued twice on the same cause of action. It does not say what happens if the licensee's suit fails.

Example. Lotus Books holds an exclusive licence for publishing a novel in one language. It sues a pirate. The author-owner is joined as a defendant and may dispute Lotus Books' claim. If Lotus Books succeeds, the owner cannot later sue the pirate on the same cause of action. Contrast section 56, where the owners of separate rights need not be joined.

Section 62(1): the court

"Every suit or other civil proceeding arising under this Chapter in respect of the infringement of copyright in any work or the infringement of any other right conferred by this Act shall be instituted in the district court having jurisdiction."

Note "any other right conferred by this Act", which includes rights beyond copyright, such as the performer's right. The Chapter's suits start in the district court.

Section 62(2): what "district court having jurisdiction" includes

"For the purpose of sub-section (1), a 'district court having jurisdiction' shall, notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, or any other law for the time being in force, include a district court within the local limits of whose jurisdiction, at the time of the institution of the suit or other proceeding, the person instituting the suit or other proceeding or, where there are more than one such persons, any of them actually and voluntarily resides or carries on business or personally works for gain."

TestDetail from the text
Time"At the time of the institution of the suit or other proceeding"
PersonThe person instituting the suit; if there are several, any of them
PlaceWhere he actually and voluntarily resides, or carries on business, or personally works for gain
OverridesThe Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and any other law in force

The word is "include": the plaintiff's place is added to the courts that would otherwise have jurisdiction; the section does not say the other courts are removed. The text does not say anything about the defendant's place, or about a minimum value of suit. Whether a Commercial Court or a Commercial Division of a High Court may hear a particular dispute depends on the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, which the Act refers to only in defining "Commercial Court" in section 2(fa) after the 2021 Act; this article does not go further.

Example. Ishaan Verma lives and runs a design studio in Pune. A company in another state copies his illustration and sells products online. Under section 62(2), Ishaan can file in the district court within whose limits he actually and voluntarily resides or carries on business, even though the defendant is elsewhere. If two co-plaintiffs live in different districts, either place qualifies.

Practical points

  1. Record the plaintiff's address, place of business or place of work at the time of filing, since the test is "at the time of the institution".
  2. In a suit by an exclusive licensee, name the owner as defendant unless the court directs otherwise.
  3. Use the right forum for the relief sought; for civil remedies, see sections 54 and 55.
  4. For criminal complaints under Chapter XIII, see section 63 and offences by companies and cognizance; section 62 deals with civil proceedings.

Need help choosing where to file?

If you are an exclusive licensee, or a rights owner deciding which district court to approach, we can check the position and prepare the filing. Our legal dispute resolution team can help.

Key takeaways

  • Section 61: the owner is joined as defendant in a suit by an exclusive licensee, unless the court directs otherwise.
  • A successful licensee's suit bars a fresh suit by the owner on the same cause of action.
  • Section 62: suits under the Chapter go to the district court having jurisdiction.
  • That court includes the one where the plaintiff actually and voluntarily resides, carries on business or personally works for gain.
  • Section 62(2) applies notwithstanding the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the Copyright Act, 1957 as amended up to 2012, read with the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021 and the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Acts of 2023 and 2026, as consulted on 1 October 2026. Forms, fees and procedure are set by the Copyright Rules, 2013 as amended from time to time. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Sections 61

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Where can I file a copyright infringement suit?

In the district court having jurisdiction, which includes the court within whose limits the plaintiff actually and voluntarily resides, carries on business or personally works for gain at the time of filing.

Can I sue where I live if the defendant is elsewhere?

Section 62(2) includes the plaintiff's place in the courts having jurisdiction.

Compliance is cheapest on the day it falls due and gets more expensive every day after.

— TaxClue Compliance Desk

Sections 61: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,350 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

In the district court having jurisdiction, which includes the court within whose limits the plaintiff actually and voluntarily resides, carries on business or personally works for gain at the time of filing.

Section 62(2) includes the plaintiff's place in the courts having jurisdiction.

The place of any one of them qualifies.

Yes, as a defendant, unless the court otherwise directs.

No fresh suit on the same cause of action lies at the owner's instance.

It speaks of suits and "civil proceeding[s] arising under this Chapter"; criminal offences are in Chapter XIII.