Next due
7 OCTTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Sep 2026in 4 days 11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 8 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 12 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 17 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 27 days 31 OCTITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27in 28 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 57 days 15 DECAdvance Tax · 3rd (75%) instalment · FY 2026-27in 73 days
All due dates

Sections 59-61 of the Indian Trusts Act, 1882: Suit for Execution of Trust, Proper Trustees and Compelling Duty

Section 59: where no trustees are appointed, or all die, disclaim or are discharged, or execution by the trustee is or becomes impracticable, the beneficiary may sue for execution...

Published
Updated
Reading time
9 min
Views
0
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Medium Complexity
  • In-Depth Guide
Topic
Trust Registration
Published
October 1, 2026
Last updated
Oct 1, 2026
Reading time
9 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

These three sections give the beneficiary ways to make a trust work when it is going wrong. Section 59 lets him sue for execution of the trust when no trustee is in place or execution has become impracticable. Section 60 gives him a right to proper trustees, in a proper number, and lists who is not a proper person. Section 61 lets him have a trustee compelled to do a particular act of duty and restrained from a contemplated or probable breach. The Act deals with private trusts; public, charitable and religious trusts are governed by other laws (see private vs public trust). If you are a beneficiary thinking of going to court, our legal dispute resolution team can assess the position.

Section 59: suit for execution of the trust

Section 59 reads: "Where no trustees are appointed or all the trustees die, disclaim, or are discharged, or where for any other reason the execution of a trust by the trustee is or becomes impracticable, the beneficiary may institute a suit for the execution of the trust, and the trust shall, so far as may be possible, be executed by the Court until the appointment of a trustee or new trustee."

A trust does not fail for want of a trustee; the Act lets the beneficiary go to court so that the trust is carried out in the meantime. The trigger has two parts: a gap in the office of trustee (none appointed, or all dead, disclaimed or discharged) or a general "impracticable" ground. The word "suit" matters: the section speaks of a suit, and the text does not say that a petition would do instead. Compare section 74, where the beneficiary may "without instituting a suit" apply by petition for the appointment of a trustee; see sections 74-75.

Section 60: right to proper trustees

Section 60 reads: "The beneficiary has a right (subject to the provisions of the instrument of trust) that the trust-property shall be properly protected and held and administered by proper persons and by a proper number of such persons."

Explanation I lists those who are not proper persons: "A person domiciled abroad; an alien enemy; a person having an interest inconsistent with that of the beneficiary; a person in insolvent circumstances; and, unless the personal law of the beneficiary allows otherwise, a married woman and a minor."

Explanation II: "When the administration of the trust involves the receipt and custody of money, the number of trustees should be two at least."

ItemPoint to note
Domiciled abroadThe Act lists it as a ground against a proper person
Alien enemyLikewise
Interest inconsistent with the beneficiary'sA conflict of interest disqualifies
Insolvent circumstancesLikewise
Married woman, minorNot proper persons "unless the personal law of the beneficiary allows otherwise"
Money received and heldAt least two trustees

The right is subject to the instrument of trust, so a deed may name a sole trustee even where money is involved, or a person the list would otherwise exclude. The text is silent on how far a deed may go. Who may be a trustee at all is dealt with in sections 9-10; section 60 is a separate test, tied to the beneficiary's right.

Section 61: compelling a trustee to act, restraining a breach

Section 61 reads: "The beneficiary has a right that his trustee shall be compelled to perform any particular act of his duty as such, and restrained from committing any contemplated or probable breach of trust."

It looks at two things: forcing a specific duty to be done, and stopping a breach that is only contemplated or probable, before it happens. The section does not name the order the Court will make, and the Act's own illustration refers to an injunction.

The Act's own illustrations

Under section 60 (five illustrations, as printed):

  1. (a) A, one of several beneficiaries, proves that trustee B has improperly disposed of part of the trust property, or that the property is in danger from B being in insolvent circumstances, or that he is incapacitated from acting. A may obtain a receiver of the trust property.
  2. (b) A bequeaths jewels to B in trust for C. B dies during A's lifetime, then A dies. C is entitled to have the property conveyed to a trustee for him.
  3. (c) A conveys property to four trustees in trust for B. Three of them die. B may sue to have three new trustees appointed in their place.
  4. (d) A conveys property to three trustees in trust for B. All of them disclaim. B may sue to have three trustees appointed in their place.
  5. (e) A, a trustee for B, refuses to act, or goes to reside permanently out of India, or is declared an insolvent, or compounds with his creditors, or suffers a co-trustee to commit a breach of trust. B may sue to have A removed and a new trustee appointed. The scanned copy shows an OCR-damaged bracket where "India" appears; the sense is clear but check the official wording.

Under section 61 (two illustrations):

  1. (a) A contracts with B to pay him Rs 100 monthly for the benefit of C. B signs a letter declaring that he will hold the money in trust for C. A fails to pay. C may compel B, on a proper indemnity, to allow C to sue on the contract in B's name.
  2. (b) A is trustee of land with a power to sell and pay the proceeds to B and C equally. A is about to make an improvident sale. B may sue on behalf of himself and C for an injunction to restrain A.

A modern example of our own

Nisha Verma settles a trust of a commercial building in Indore for her two sons, Dev and Arjun. The sole trustee, her cousin Rakesh, is declared insolvent, and he has also been quietly mortgaging the building.

  • Dev, as beneficiary, can rely on section 60: Rakesh, in insolvent circumstances, is not a proper person under Explanation I, and the Act's illustration (a) of section 60 lets a beneficiary seek a receiver when the property is in danger.
  • If Rakesh is about to sell the building at a knock-down price, section 61 and its illustration (b) show that a beneficiary may sue for an injunction to restrain an improvident sale.
  • If Rakesh resigns and no one is left, section 59 lets the sons sue for execution of the trust until a new trustee is appointed.

What the instrument of trust can change

Section 60 is expressly "subject to the provisions of the instrument of trust". Sections 59 and 61 as printed do not carry those words, and the text does not say whether a deed can limit them. A settlor can still help by naming a successor trustee and a power of appointment in the deed; see appointment of new trustee.

Practical points

  • Beneficiaries: keep evidence of what has gone wrong (accounts, sale papers, notices) before approaching a court.
  • Settlors: name more than one trustee when money is involved, to match Explanation II, and name a successor.
  • Trustees: tell the beneficiaries and take advice early if you become unable to act, for example by moving abroad or by insolvency.

Need help with a failing trust?

If no trustee is acting, a trustee is not a proper person, or a breach of trust looks imminent, the facts and the deed decide what can be done. Our legal dispute resolution team can read the deed and the papers and advise on a suit or an injunction.

Key takeaways

  • Section 59: where there is no trustee or execution is impracticable, the beneficiary may sue and the Court executes the trust until a trustee is appointed.
  • Section 60: a right to proper trustees in proper number, subject to the deed; Explanation I lists who is not proper; Explanation II needs at least two trustees where money is received and held.
  • Section 61: the beneficiary may have the trustee compelled to do a particular act of duty and restrained from a contemplated or probable breach.
  • The Act's illustrations: a receiver, new trustees by suit, removal of a trustee, an injunction against an improvident sale.
  • The Act deals with private trusts only.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the text of the Indian Trusts Act, 1882 as consulted on 1 October 2026 from a scanned copy; the Act applies to private trusts, and public, charitable and religious trusts are governed by other laws. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text and take advice before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Sections 59-61

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

What can a beneficiary do if all the trustees have died?

Section 59 lets the beneficiary sue for execution of the trust, and the Court executes it so far as possible until a trustee is appointed.

Who is not a proper person to be a trustee under section 60?

Explanation I lists a person domiciled abroad, an alien enemy, a person with an inconsistent interest, a person in insolvent circumstances and, unless the beneficiary's personal law allows otherwise, a married woman and a minor.

Foreign contributions follow their own law and their own bank account — never mix them.

— TaxClue NGO & Trust Desk

Sections 59-61: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
11,561 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

Section 59 lets the beneficiary sue for execution of the trust, and the Court executes it so far as possible until a trustee is appointed.

Explanation I lists a person domiciled abroad, an alien enemy, a person with an inconsistent interest, a person in insolvent circumstances and, unless the beneficiary's personal law allows otherwise, a married woman and a minor.

Explanation II says that where the administration involves receiving and holding money, the number should be two at least.

Section 61 says the trustee may be restrained from "any contemplated or probable breach of trust".

Section 60 is stated to be subject to the instrument of trust, so the deed can change what counts as proper in that trust.

Section 59 speaks of a suit. Section 74 separately allows a petition for appointment of a trustee; see sections 74-75.