Next dueCompany / ROC
14 OCTADT-1 · Auditor appointment (after AGM)in 11 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 27 days 31 OCTITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27in 28 days 31 OCTMSME-1 · Dues to MSMEs · Apr–Sep 2026in 28 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 57 days 30 JUNDPT-3 · Return of deposits · FY 2026-27in 270 days 7 OCTTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Sep 2026in 4 days 11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 8 days
All due dates

Sections 443 to 445 of the Companies Act, 2013: Company Prosecutors and Appeal Against Acquittal

The Central Government may appoint one or more company prosecutors, generally, for a case or for a class of cases in a local area, to conduct prosecutions under the Act, with all...

Published
Updated
Reading time
6 min
Views
8
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • High Complexity
Topic
MCA Compliance
Published
September 30, 2026
Last updated
Oct 3, 2026
Reading time
6 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Sections 443 to 445 deal with the conduct of criminal cases under the Act. Section 443 lets the Central Government appoint company prosecutors, section 444 lets it direct an appeal against an acquittal, and section 445 applies the compensation rule for accusation without reasonable cause to cases before the Special Court or Court of Session.

Sections 443 to 445 at a glance

SectionWhat it doesWho acts
443Appoints company prosecutors with the powers and privileges of Public Prosecutors appointed under section 24 of the CodeCentral Government
444Appeal against acquittal by any court other than a High CourtCentral Government directs a company prosecutor or authorises another person
445Compensation for accusation without reasonable cause; section 250 CrPC applies mutatis mutandisSpecial Court or Court of Session

Note on the old code. All three sections cite the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. From 1 July 2024 it was replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and references to the old Code are now read as references to the new law. We do not give the new section numbers here. Check the equivalent provisions in the new Sanhita before citing them.

Section 443: company prosecutors

"Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973", the Central Government may appoint:

  • generally, or
  • for any case, or in any case, or
  • for any specified class of cases in any local area,

one or more persons as company prosecutors "for the conduct of prosecutions arising out of this Act". A company prosecutor has all the powers and privileges that the Code confers on Public Prosecutors appointed under section 24 of the Code.

In plain terms, the Central Government has its own route to appoint prosecutors for offences under the Companies Act. The prosecutor appears in court, such as the Special Court, and leads the prosecution. For the courts that try these offences, see sections 435 to 441: Special Courts and compounding of offences.

If you are a director, officer or company facing a complaint or prosecution under the Act, our legal consultation team can help you understand the allegation, the court and your options.

Section 444: appeal against acquittal

Under section 444, the Central Government may, in any case arising under the Act:

  1. Direct any company prosecutor, or
  2. Authorise any other person, by name or by virtue of his office,

to present an appeal from an order of acquittal passed by any court, other than a High Court. An appeal presented by such prosecutor or other person is deemed to have been validly presented to the appellate court.

Three points from the text:

  • The power belongs to the Central Government, not to the informant or the company.
  • It covers acquittals by courts other than a High Court, so an acquittal by a Special Court is within it. The text does not cover an acquittal passed by a High Court.
  • The section does not give a time limit. The time to appeal, and the appellate court, come from the procedural law for criminal appeals, so check them before acting. The section only says that an appeal so presented is deemed validly presented.

Example. The Special Court acquits a director of an offence under the Act. The Central Government directs the company prosecutor to present an appeal. The appeal is deemed validly presented to the appellate court, so the question of who may present it does not arise.

Section 445: compensation for accusation without reasonable cause

Section 445 says the provisions of section 250 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 apply mutatis mutandis to compensation for accusation without reasonable cause before the Special Court or the Court of Session. The effect is that where a complaint is found to be without reasonable cause, the court can consider compensation to the accused, under the procedure borrowed from the Code.

We do not set out the detailed terms of section 250 here, such as the amount or the procedure, because they depend on the Code and its replacement. Check the text of the current provision before relying on it. The aim is to discourage baseless accusations. It is a safeguard for accused persons, balancing the prosecution powers in sections 443 and 444.

How these sections fit with the rest of the Act's criminal framework

TopicWhere to look
Courts that try offencesSections 435 to 438: Special Courts
CompoundingSection 441, in sections 435 to 441
FraudSection 447
Level of punishmentSection 446A sets factors such as size of company, nature of business, injury to public interest, nature of default and repetition

Proposed change (Corporate Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2026)

We found no clause in the Corporate Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2026 that amends section 443, 444 or 445. A clause of the Bill (clause 97) amends section 441, which deals with compounding and is outside these three sections. The Bill was introduced in Lok Sabha on 23 March 2026 and sent to a Joint Parliamentary Committee, whose report came on 3 August 2026. It is pending and not law as on 30 September 2026.

Need help with a prosecution under the Companies Act?

A prosecution turns on the complaint, the court and the record. Our legal consultation team can review the allegation with you and advise on the steps available, including compounding where the law allows it.

Key takeaways

  • The Central Government appoints company prosecutors for prosecutions under the Act.
  • They have the powers and privileges of Public Prosecutors under the Code.
  • The Central Government can direct an appeal against an acquittal by any court other than a High Court.
  • Section 250 CrPC applies, mutatis mutandis, to compensation for accusation without reasonable cause before the Special Court or Court of Session.
  • References to the old Code are now read as references to the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the Companies Act, 2013 as amended up to 1 April 2021 (official consolidated text), read with later developments noted in the article; proposals in the Corporate Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2026 are pending and not law as on 30 September 2026. Verify current notifications and rules before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Sections 443 to 445

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Who appoints company prosecutors?

The Central Government, under section 443.

What powers does a company prosecutor have?

All the powers and privileges conferred by the Code of Criminal Procedure on Public Prosecutors appointed under section 24 of the Code.

A company's statutory registers are its memory — keep them current and they will answer most questions for you.

— TaxClue Corporate Law Desk

Sections 443 to 445: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
12,982 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

The Central Government, under section 443.

All the powers and privileges conferred by the Code of Criminal Procedure on Public Prosecutors appointed under section 24 of the Code.

Section 444 allows the Central Government to direct a company prosecutor, or authorise another person, to present an appeal against an acquittal by any court other than a High Court.

No. The text says "any court, other than a High Court".

It applies section 250 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, mutatis mutandis, to compensation for accusation without reasonable cause before the Special Court or Court of Session.

The Act cites it, but from 1 July 2024 references are read as references to the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.