Next dueCompany / ROC
14 OCTADT-1 · Auditor appointment (after AGM)in 8 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 24 days 31 OCTITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27in 25 days 31 OCTMSME-1 · Dues to MSMEs · Apr–Sep 2026in 25 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 54 days 30 JUNDPT-3 · Return of deposits · FY 2026-27in 267 days 7 OCTTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Sep 2026tomorrow 11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 5 days
All due dates

Sections 42–46 of the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981: protection for good faith, cognizance of offences, Board staff as public servants, reports and returns, and bar of civil courts

Section 43: no court takes cognizance of an offence under the Act except on a complaint by a Board or its authorised officer, by the adjudicating officer or his authorised officer...

Published
Updated
Reading time
8 min
Views
4
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Medium Complexity
  • In-Depth Guide
Topic
Registrations & Licenses
Published
October 3, 2026
Last updated
Oct 5, 2026
Reading time
8 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

These five sections close the penalties and procedure chapter. Section 42 protects those who act in good faith. Section 43 says who may make a complaint of an offence, after a sixty-day notice in the case of a private person, and which courts can try it. Section 44 treats Board members and staff as public servants. Section 45 requires reports and returns from the Boards. Section 46 bars civil courts and injunctions.

This article is current as amended up to the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2023 (in force for this Act from 1 April 2024). That Act inserted clause (aa) in section 43(1); sections 40 and 41 no longer exist, which is why the numbering moves from 39D to 42. Later amendments and notifications should be checked. If you intend to complain of an offence, or face a complaint, our legal dispute resolution team can help.

Section 42: protection of action taken in good faith

"No suit, prosecution or other legal proceeding shall lie against the Government or any officer of the Government or any member or any officer or other employee of the Board in respect of anything which is done or intended to be done in good faith in pursuance of this Act or the rules made thereunder."

The protection is for action in good faith in pursuance of the Act. It covers things done and things "intended to be done".

Section 43: cognizance of offences

Section 43(1). "No court shall take cognizance of any offence under this Act except on a complaint made by:

ClauseComplainant
(a)A Board or any officer authorised in this behalf by it
(aa)The adjudicating officer or any officer authorised by him in this behalf (inserted by the Jan Vishwas Act, 2023)
(b)Any person who has given notice of not less than sixty days, in the manner prescribed, of the alleged offence and of his intention to make a complaint to the Board or officer authorised as aforesaid

and no court inferior to that of a Metropolitan Magistrate or a Judicial Magistrate of the first class shall try any offence punishable under this Act."

Section 43(2). Where a complaint has been made under clause (b), the Board shall, on demand by that person, make available the relevant reports in its possession to him. The proviso: the Board "may refuse to make any such report available to such person if the same is, in its opinion, against the public interest".

The offences that survive in the Act are in section 39D: failing to comply with section 21 and failing to pay a penalty. The penalties in sections 37 to 39 are not tried as offences; they are imposed by the adjudicating officer, as set out in sections 39 to 39C. Clause (aa) lets the adjudicating officer, who imposes the penalty, be a complainant too.

The three routes mean a private person can complain, but only after giving the required notice. The sixty days are "not less than", and the manner of the notice is prescribed. The Water Act has the same pattern; see sections 49 and 50 of the Water Act and, for the EP Act, sections 18 to 21.

Section 44: Board members and staff as public servants

"All the members and all officers and other employees of a Board when acting or purporting to act in pursuance of any of the provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder shall be deemed to be public servants within the meaning of section 21 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860)." The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 has replaced the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The words "acting or purporting to act" cover an officer who claims to act under the Act, whether or not he was acting within it.

Section 45: reports and returns

The Central Board shall, in relation to its functions under the Act, furnish to the Central Government, and a State Board shall furnish to the State Government and to the Central Board, "such reports, returns, statistics, accounts and other information as that Government, or, as the case may be, the Central Board may, from time to time, require". This is a duty of the Boards, not of industry.

Section 46: bar of jurisdiction

"No civil court shall have jurisdiction to entertain any suit or proceeding in respect of any matter which an Appellate Authority constituted under this Act is empowered by or under this Act to determine, and no injunction shall be granted by any court or other authority in respect of any action taken or to be taken in pursuance of any power conferred by or under this Act."

There are two limbs. A civil suit cannot be brought on a matter that the Appellate Authority under section 31 can decide, so the statutory appeal is the route. And no court or other authority can grant an injunction against action taken or to be taken under a power conferred by the Act. The appeals that the Act itself provides, to the Appellate Authority and then the National Green Tribunal, are the remedies.

Who may do what

QuestionAnswerSection
Can a person be sued for good-faith action under the Act?No suit, prosecution or legal proceeding lies42
Who may complain of an offence?A Board or authorised officer; the adjudicating officer or authorised officer; a person after at least sixty days' notice43(1)
Which court tries it?Not inferior to a Metropolitan Magistrate or Judicial Magistrate of the first class43(1)
Are Board staff public servants?Yes, when acting or purporting to act under the Act44
Can a civil court decide an Appellate Authority matter?No46
Can an injunction be granted against action under the Act?No46

Practical points

  1. Check who filed the complaint. If it is not a Board, an authorised officer or an adjudicating officer, confirm the sixty-day notice was given.
  2. Request reports. After a private complaint, the Board must make relevant reports available on demand, unless it forms the opinion that this is against the public interest.
  3. Use the statutory appeal for Board orders; a civil suit on those matters is barred.
  4. Check the court. Trial lies only before a Metropolitan Magistrate or Judicial Magistrate of the first class, or a higher court.

An example

A residents' welfare association believes Chambal Spinning Mills Limited is running a unit without consent. It sends the State Board a notice, in the prescribed manner, stating the alleged offence and its intention to complain. After sixty days it files a complaint before a Metropolitan Magistrate under section 43(1)(b). The Board, on demand, makes relevant reports available unless it considers them against the public interest.

Need help with a complaint?

Whether a complaint was properly made, and before the right court, can decide how far it goes. Our legal dispute resolution team can help you review the complaint, the notice and the defences available.

Key takeaways

  • Action in good faith under the Act is protected from suit, prosecution or other legal proceeding.
  • A court takes cognizance of an offence only on a complaint by a Board, the adjudicating officer or a person who has given at least sixty days' notice.
  • Trial lies before a court not inferior to a Metropolitan Magistrate or Judicial Magistrate of the first class.
  • Board members and staff are public servants when acting or purporting to act under the Act.
  • Civil courts cannot decide matters within the Appellate Authority's power, and no injunction lies against action under the Act.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 and the Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991 as amended by the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2023 (in force for these Acts from 1 April 2024), the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 as amended by its Amendment Act of 2024 (which applies only in the States and Union territories it names and in States that adopt it), and the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 as amended by the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021, as consulted on 3 October 2026. Later amendments, rules and notifications should be checked. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Cognizance of offences

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Who can file a complaint of an offence under the Air Act?

A Board or an officer it authorises, the adjudicating officer or an officer he authorises, or any person who has given at least sixty days' notice of the alleged offence and of his intention to complain.

Can an ordinary citizen complain?

Yes, after giving notice of not less than sixty days, in the manner prescribed, to the Board or authorised officer.

What is not written down will be remembered differently by everyone involved.

— TaxClue Compliance Desk

Cognizance of offences: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,327 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

A Board or an officer it authorises, the adjudicating officer or an officer he authorises, or any person who has given at least sixty days' notice of the alleged offence and of his intention to complain.

Yes, after giving notice of not less than sixty days, in the manner prescribed, to the Board or authorised officer.

No court inferior to that of a Metropolitan Magistrate or a Judicial Magistrate of the first class.

Yes, it inserted clause (aa), allowing a complaint by the adjudicating officer or an officer authorised by him.

Section 46 says no injunction shall be granted by any court or other authority in respect of any action taken or to be taken in pursuance of any power conferred by or under the Act.

Yes, when acting or purporting to act under the Act, by section 44.