Next dueCompany / ROC
14 OCTADT-1 · Auditor appointment (after AGM)in 9 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 25 days 31 OCTITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27in 26 days 31 OCTMSME-1 · Dues to MSMEs · Apr–Sep 2026in 26 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 55 days 30 JUNDPT-3 · Return of deposits · FY 2026-27in 268 days 7 OCTTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Sep 2026in 2 days 11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 6 days
All due dates

Sections 49 and 50 of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974: who may complain to a court, the sixty-day notice, the courts that try offences, and Board members as public servants

No court takes cognizance of an offence under the Act except on a complaint by (a) a Board or its authorised officer, (aa) the adjudicating officer or his authorised officer...

Published
Updated
Reading time
8 min
Views
6
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Medium Complexity
  • In-Depth Guide
Topic
Registrations & Licenses
Published
October 3, 2026
Last updated
Oct 5, 2026
Reading time
8 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Section 49 says a court takes cognizance of a Water Act offence only on a complaint by the Board or its authorised officer, the adjudicating officer or his authorised officer, or a person who has given at least sixty days' notice. It also fixes which courts try offences and gives a complainant the right to the Board's reports. Section 50 treats Board members, officers and servants as public servants.

This article is current as amended up to the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Amendment Act, 2024 (in force from 15 February 2024 in Himachal Pradesh, Rajasthan and the Union territories, and in other States from the date they adopt it). Section 49(1) was changed by that Act (clause (aa) inserted); section 50 was not. Later amendments and notifications should be checked. If you are considering a complaint or have received one, our legal dispute resolution team can help.

Section 49(1): who may complain

"No court shall take cognizance of any offence under this Act except on a complaint made by—"

ClauseComplainant
(a)A Board or any officer authorised in this behalf by it
(aa)The adjudicating officer or any officer authorised by him in this behalf (inserted w.e.f. 15 February 2024)
(b)Any person who has given notice of not less than sixty days, in the manner prescribed, of the alleged offence and of his intention to make a complaint, to the Board or officer authorised as aforesaid

"and no court inferior to that of a Metropolitan Magistrate or a Judicial Magistrate of the first class shall try any offence punishable under this Act."

The 2024 clause (aa)

Clause (aa) was inserted by the 2024 Amendment Act. It fits the offence that follows a penalty: not paying a penalty imposed by an adjudicating officer is an offence under section 45E(3), and the adjudicating officer or his authorised officer can complain. See sections 45E to 48.

In a State that has not adopted the 2024 Act, the earlier wording continues: section 49(1) has only two complainants, (a) a Board or any officer authorised by it, and (b) a person who has given sixty days' notice. There is no clause (aa), since there is no adjudicating officer under that regime. The rest of the sub-section, including the bar on courts inferior to a Metropolitan Magistrate or a Judicial Magistrate of the first class, is the same. Check whether your State has adopted the 2024 Act.

Section 49(2): reports for a private complainant

"Where a complaint has been made under clause (b) of sub-section (1), the Board shall, on demand by such person, make available the relevant reports in its possession to that person: Provided that the Board may refuse to make any such report available to such person if the same is, in its opinion, against the public interest."

If you complain as a private person after the sixty-day notice, you can demand the Board's relevant reports, such as sample analysis reports. The Board has a discretion to refuse where it is of the opinion that disclosure is against the public interest. The Act does not require reasons to be recorded.

Section 49(3): sentencing power

"Notwithstanding anything contained in section 29 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), it shall be lawful for any Judicial Magistrate of the first class or for any Metropolitan Magistrate to pass a sentence of imprisonment for a term exceeding two years or of fine exceeding two thousand rupees on any person convicted of an offence punishable under this Act."

The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is named as printed. The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has replaced it. The point of the sub-section is that a first-class Magistrate may impose the sentences the Act provides, even though they exceed the limits that would otherwise apply to a Magistrate's sentencing power. Offences under section 45E(1) and (2) carry imprisonment of one year and six months or more, and up to seven years, so this sub-section is relevant to them.

Section 50: Board staff as public servants

"All members, officers and servants of a Board when acting or purporting to act in pursuance of any of the provisions of this Act and the rules made thereunder shall be deemed to be public servants within the meaning of section 21 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860)."

This was not changed. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 has replaced the Indian Penal Code. The deeming applies to members, officers and servants of a Board, and only when they act or purport to act under the Act and the rules.

What this means in practice

  1. Check the complainant. A complaint not by a clause (a), (aa) or (b) person is open to challenge.
  2. Where a citizen complains, the sixty-day notice, in the prescribed manner, comes first.
  3. Court level. The trial court must be a Metropolitan Magistrate or a Judicial Magistrate of the first class, or higher.
  4. Reports. A citizen complainant can ask the Board for reports; the Board may refuse on public interest grounds.
  5. Respondents should note that Board staff are public servants while acting under the Act.
  6. Penalty matters are not complaints. Where the 2024 Act applies, civil penalties are imposed by the adjudicating officer, and only the offences are tried on complaint.

An example

Dhansiri Textiles Private Limited has not paid a penalty imposed by an adjudicating officer for ninety days. The adjudicating officer authorises an officer to file a complaint under section 49(1)(aa) before a Judicial Magistrate of the first class. The company's counsel checks the authorisation and the dates and prepares the defence on the facts. In a different case, a local residents' association sends the Board a notice of an alleged offence and its intention to complain; after sixty days it files a complaint and demands the Board's sample reports under section 49(2), which the Board supplies.

Need help with a complaint?

Complaints are procedural as well as factual. Our legal dispute resolution team can check the complainant's standing, the notice and the court, and prepare your response or your own complaint.

Key takeaways

  • A court takes cognizance only on a complaint by a Board or its officer, the adjudicating officer or his officer (where the 2024 Act applies), or a person who has given at least sixty days' notice.
  • Offences are tried by a court not inferior to a Metropolitan Magistrate or a Judicial Magistrate of the first class.
  • A citizen complainant may demand the Board's reports; the Board may refuse if against the public interest.
  • Board members, officers and servants are public servants when acting under the Act.
  • The Code of Criminal Procedure and Indian Penal Code references are as printed; the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 have replaced them.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 and the Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991 as amended by the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2023 (in force for these Acts from 1 April 2024), the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 as amended by its Amendment Act of 2024 (which applies only in the States and Union territories it names and in States that adopt it), and the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 as amended by the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021, as consulted on 3 October 2026. Later amendments, rules and notifications should be checked. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Water Act

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Who can file a complaint under the Water Act?

A Board or its authorised officer, the adjudicating officer or his authorised officer (where the 2024 Act applies), or any person who has given at least sixty days' notice of the offence and of his intention to complain.

What notice must a private person give?

Notice of not less than sixty days, in the manner prescribed, to the Board or its authorised officer, of the alleged offence and of the intention to complain.

A founders' agreement is easiest to write while everyone still agrees.

— TaxClue Business Setup Desk

Water Act: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,327 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

A Board or its authorised officer, the adjudicating officer or his authorised officer (where the 2024 Act applies), or any person who has given at least sixty days' notice of the offence and of his intention to complain.

Notice of not less than sixty days, in the manner prescribed, to the Board or its authorised officer, of the alleged offence and of the intention to complain.

A court not inferior to a Metropolitan Magistrate or a Judicial Magistrate of the first class.

Yes, on demand, under section 49(2), unless the Board is of the opinion that it is against the public interest.

It inserted clause (aa) in section 49(1), allowing a complaint by the adjudicating officer or an officer authorised by him. Section 50 was not changed.

Yes, when acting or purporting to act under the Act and rules, under section 50.