Next due
11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 2 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 6 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 11 days 21 OCTTax Audit Report · Form 3CA/3CB · AY 2026-27 · extended from 30 Sepin 12 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 21 days 7 NOVTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Oct 2026in 29 days 21 NOVITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27 · extended from 31 Octin 43 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 51 days
All due dates

Sections 38–39 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872: Tender of Performance and Refusal to Perform Wholly

Under s.38, a promisor who has made a proper offer of performance that is not accepted is not responsible for non-performance, nor does he lose his rights under the contract. The...

Published
Updated
Reading time
8 min
Views
10
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Medium Complexity
  • In-Depth Guide
Topic
Contract Law
Published
October 1, 2026
Last updated
Oct 9, 2026
Reading time
8 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Section 38 says what happens when a promisor offers performance and the promisee does not accept it, and lists the conditions a valid offer must meet. Section 39 says what the promisee may do when the other party refuses to perform, or disables itself from performing, the whole of its promise. People often search section 39 as "anticipatory breach"; that phrase is not used in the Act, which speaks of refusal or disablement. If you need to put a defaulting party on notice, our legal notice drafting service can help.

Section 38: effect of refusal to accept an offer of performance

The first paragraph: "Where a promisor has made an offer of performance to the promisee, and the offer has not been accepted, the promisor is not responsible for non-performance, nor does he thereby lose his rights under the contract."

This follows from section 37, which allows a party to "perform, or offer to perform"; see section 37. Two consequences are named: the promisor is not responsible for the resulting non-performance, and he keeps his rights under the contract (for example, his right to be paid).

The three conditions of a valid offer

Every such offer "must fulfil the following conditions":

No.Condition in the Act
(1)It must be unconditional.
(2)It must be made at a proper time and place, and under such circumstances that the person to whom it is made may have a reasonable opportunity of ascertaining that the person making it is able and willing there and then to do the whole of what he is bound to do.
(3)If it is an offer to deliver anything, the promisee must have a reasonable opportunity of seeing that the thing offered is the thing the promisor is bound to deliver.

Note the word "whole" in condition (2). A part-offer does not meet it. Note also "there and then": a promise to perform later does not count.

Joint promisees

The last paragraph says: "An offer to one of several joint promisees has the same legal consequences as an offer to all of them."

The Act's illustration

A contracts to deliver to B at his warehouse, on the 1st March, 1873, 100 bales of cotton of a particular quality. To make an offer with the effect stated in the section, A must bring the cotton to B's warehouse on the appointed day, in circumstances where B has a reasonable opportunity to satisfy himself that it is cotton of the contracted quality and that there are 100 bales.

A modern example (ours). Rohan agrees to deliver 200 laptops to Sapna Retail's godown on 5 May. He arrives on 5 May during working hours with the full lot, boxes open for inspection. Sapna's manager refuses to receive them. Under s.38, Rohan has made a proper offer: he is not responsible for non-delivery and keeps his right to the price. If he had brought only 150 laptops, or had said "I will deliver only if you pay in advance, though the contract says otherwise", the offer would not meet conditions (1) and (2).

Section 39: refusal to perform a promise wholly

"When a party to a contract has refused to perform, or disabled himself from performing, his promise in its entirety, the promisee may put an end to the contract, unless he has signified, by words or conduct, his acquiescence in its continuance."

Break it down.

  1. Refused to perform, or disabled himself. Two routes: an outright refusal, or an act that makes performance impossible for that party. The section does not say that either must happen at a particular time; it applies whenever a party has so refused or disabled itself.
  2. "In its entirety." The section is about the whole promise. It does not, by its words, deal with a refusal of only part of it.
  3. "The promisee may put an end to the contract." The right is the promisee's choice. It is not automatic.
  4. "Unless he has signified, by words or conduct, his acquiescence in its continuance." If the promisee has indicated that the contract continues, the right to end it is lost.

The Act's illustrations

IllustrationFactsResult
(a)A, a singer, contracts with B, a theatre manager, to sing two nights every week for two months at Rs. 100 a night. On the sixth night A wilfully absents herself.B is at liberty to put an end to the contract.
(b)Same contract. On the sixth night A absents herself, but with B's assent she sings on the seventh night.B has signified acquiescence in the continuance of the contract and cannot now end it, but is entitled to compensation for the damage through A's failure to sing on the sixth night.

The second illustration shows that continuing the contract does not cost the promisee his claim for compensation for the missed night.

A modern example (ours). A software firm, Nimbus Labs, agrees to build a billing portal for Orchid Clinics in three phases. In month two it tells Orchid in writing it will not do the work. Under s.39 Orchid may put an end to the contract. If Orchid replies, "Please continue and finish by month five", it may be taken to have signified acquiescence in continuance, and the right to end the contract may be lost for that refusal.

What the parties can change

Neither section carries the words "unless a contrary intention appears". The parties can still shape the practical side by contract: how notice of refusal must be given, how tender must be made, and what counts as acquiescence (for example, "no conduct will waive a right unless in writing"). Whether such a clause is effective in a given case depends on the contract and on case law not covered here.

Practical points

  • Tender properly. Record the time, place, quantity and inspection facility whenever you offer delivery.
  • Do not make the offer conditional on something the contract does not require.
  • Decide quickly. If the other side refuses wholly, decide whether to end the contract; carrying on may be read as acquiescence.
  • Reserve rights in writing. If you continue, say that you reserve your claim for loss. For the compensation rule, see section 73.

Need help with a notice of default?

If the other side has refused to perform, or you have made a proper tender that was turned away, a clear written notice protects your position. Our legal notice drafting service can prepare a notice that records the tender, the refusal and your election to end or continue the contract. Bring the contract and your correspondence and we can start from there.

Key takeaways

  • A proper, unaccepted offer of performance leaves the promisor not responsible and with his rights intact (s.38).
  • A valid offer is unconditional, at a proper time and place, shows ability and willingness to do the whole, and (for goods) allows inspection.
  • An offer to one joint promisee counts as an offer to all.
  • On refusal or disablement as to the whole promise, the promisee may end the contract (s.39).
  • The right is lost if the promisee signifies acquiescence in continuance, though compensation for the damage may still be claimed, as the Act's illustration (b) shows.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the text of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 as consulted on 1 October 2026. Many questions under this Act turn on case law and on the wording of the particular contract, which this article does not cover. It is general information, not legal advice; check the official text and take advice before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Sections 38

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Is "anticipatory breach" a term in section 39?

No. The section speaks of a party who "has refused to perform, or disabled himself from performing, his promise in its entirety".

Must the promisee end the contract?

No. The text says he "may" put an end to it. He can also choose to continue.

One person should own every deadline. A deadline that belongs to everyone belongs to no one.

— TaxClue Compliance Desk

Sections 38: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,350 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

No. The section speaks of a party who "has refused to perform, or disabled himself from performing, his promise in its entirety".

No. The text says he "may" put an end to it. He can also choose to continue.

The words are "in its entirety". The section does not address a refusal of only part of the promise.

If it met the three conditions in s.38, you are not responsible for the resulting non-performance and keep your rights under the contract.

Under the Act's illustration (b), the promisee who acquiesced was still entitled to compensation for the damage from the missed performance.

Yes. Section 38 gives it the same consequences as an offer to all of them.