Next due
11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 2 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 6 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 11 days 21 OCTTax Audit Report · Form 3CA/3CB · AY 2026-27 · extended from 30 Sepin 12 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 21 days 7 NOVTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Oct 2026in 29 days 21 NOVITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27 · extended from 31 Octin 43 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 51 days
All due dates

Section 37A of the Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999: Adjudication of Penalties

The Registrar may, by an order, authorise an officer referred to in section 3 to be the adjudicating officer. That officer holds an inquiry and imposes a penalty under the Act, in...

Published
Updated
Reading time
7 min
Views
11
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Medium Complexity
Topic
GI Registration
Published
October 1, 2026
Last updated
Oct 9, 2026
Reading time
7 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Section 37A lets the Registrar of Geographical Indications authorise an officer to act as an "adjudicating officer", hold an inquiry and impose a penalty under the Act, after giving a reasonable opportunity of being heard. It is a new section: it was not in the Act as originally enacted and is not in the printed principal text. If a penalty notice has reached you, our legal dispute resolution team can read the order and the timelines with you.

Where section 37A comes from

The Act as enacted has Chapter VIII (offences, penalties and procedure) running from section 37 straight to section 38. Item 31 of the Schedule to the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2023 deals with this Act. Its clause (A) says that after section 37 two sections shall be inserted: 37A and 37B. The same item substitutes the punishment in section 42(2), omits sections 43 and 44, and adds two rule-making heads to section 87(2). The text we read does not print a commencement date for these changes in that entry, so we give none; check the official text for it.

The Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021 does not touch section 37A. It was not in existence when that Act was passed.

The words of the section

Section 37A, headed "Adjudication of penalties", reads: "The Registrar may, by an order, authorise an officer referred to in section 3, to be adjudicating officer for holding an inquiry and imposing penalty under the provisions of this Act, in the manner as may be prescribed, after giving a reasonable opportunity of being heard."

ElementWhat the text says
Who authorisesThe Registrar
HowBy an order
Who can be authorisedAn officer referred to in section 3
Title givenAdjudicating officer
JobHolding an inquiry and imposing penalty
Scope"Under the provisions of this Act"
Manner"As may be prescribed"
SafeguardA reasonable opportunity of being heard

Who is "an officer referred to in section 3"

Section 3(1) makes the Controller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks the Registrar of Geographical Indications. Section 3(2) lets the Central Government appoint officers, with such designations as it thinks fit, to discharge, under the Registrar's superintendence and direction, such functions of the Registrar as he may from time to time authorise. Section 4 lets the Registrar withdraw a matter from such an officer or transfer it to another.

Section 37A uses the phrase "an officer referred to in section 3". The natural reading is the officers appointed under section 3(2). The text does not say in so many words whether the Registrar himself may also sit as adjudicating officer, so we do not claim either way. It also does not name any designation. Who has actually been authorised is a matter of the Registrar's orders, which are outside the sources we used.

Penalty, not prosecution

The Act has two kinds of consequence, and it helps to keep them apart.

Offence tried by a courtPenalty imposed by adjudicating officer
Typical provisionsSections 39, 40 and 41 (imprisonment and fine)Section 42(2), as now amended (a penalty in money)
Who decidesA court; section 50(2) says none inferior to a Metropolitan Magistrate or Judicial Magistrate of the first class may try an offenceAn officer authorised by the Registrar under section 37A
ProcessTrialInquiry, after a reasonable opportunity of being heard
ChallengeAppeal as the law of criminal procedure allowsAppeal under section 37B to an officer one rank above

Section 37A speaks only of "penalty under the provisions of this Act". It does not list which provisions. The only provision we can point to from the amending text is section 42(2), where the Jan Vishwas Act replaced "punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both" with "liable to penalty of a sum equal to one-half per cent. of the total sales or turnover, as the case may be, in business or of the gross receipts in profession as computed in the audited accounts of such person, or a sum equal to five lakh rupees, whichever is less". That is explained in the article on section 42.

The inquiry and the hearing

Two features of the section protect the person facing the penalty.

  1. Reasonable opportunity of being heard. The adjudicating officer may impose a penalty only "after giving" this opportunity. A penalty order made without it would be open to challenge on the face of the section.
  2. Prescribed manner. The inquiry and the imposition of the penalty are to follow "the manner as may be prescribed". The Jan Vishwas Act adds clause (oa) to section 87(2) so the rules can cover "the manner of holding inquiry and imposing penalty under section 37A". The rules are not in our sources, so we state no notice period, form, fee or step.

Example. The Registrar authorises an officer by order to adjudicate. A trader, Kavita Handlooms, is alleged to have represented an unregistered indication as registered. The officer issues notice, hears Kavita Handlooms and then passes an order imposing a penalty. If the officer had passed the order without any hearing, the section's own condition would not have been met. If Kavita Handlooms is aggrieved by the order, section 37B gives it sixty days from receipt of the order to appeal.

What section 37A does not say

  • It does not say which officers are authorised; that is for the Registrar's order.
  • It does not list the penalties that can be adjudicated.
  • It does not fix a time limit for the inquiry.
  • It does not prescribe the form of notice, the evidence rules or any fee; the text leaves all of that to the rules.
  • It does not say that every contravention must go through adjudication.

Practical points

  1. On receiving any notice, check that it comes from an officer authorised by the Registrar's order. Ask for a copy of that authorisation.
  2. Use the hearing. File a written reply and ask for the documents relied on.
  3. Note the date you receive the final order; the appeal clock under section 37B runs from receipt.
  4. Keep audited accounts ready, because the section 42(2) penalty is computed on them.

Need help with a penalty inquiry under the GI Act?

A penalty inquiry moves quickly to an order, and the appeal window is short. Our legal dispute resolution team can prepare your reply to the notice, attend the hearing with you and plan any appeal. The first step is to bring us the notice and any order of authorisation.

Key takeaways

  • Section 37A was inserted after section 37 by the Jan Vishwas Act, 2023; it is not in the principal text.
  • The Registrar, by an order, authorises an officer referred to in section 3 as adjudicating officer.
  • The officer holds an inquiry and imposes penalty under the Act, in the prescribed manner, after a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
  • Sections 39, 40 and 41 remain offences for a court; section 42(2) is now a penalty.
  • The appeal against the order is under section 37B.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999 read with the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021 and the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2023, as consulted on 1 October 2026. Forms, fees and procedure are set by the rules made under the Act. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Section 37A

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

What is an adjudicating officer under the GI Act?

An officer referred to in section 3 whom the Registrar has authorised by an order to hold an inquiry and impose a penalty under the Act.

Does the officer have to hear me before imposing a penalty?

Yes. Section 37A permits the penalty only after giving a reasonable opportunity of being heard.

A penalty is the visible cost of a delay; the lost time and credibility are the larger part.

— TaxClue Compliance Desk

Section 37A: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,350 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

An officer referred to in section 3 whom the Registrar has authorised by an order to hold an inquiry and impose a penalty under the Act.

Yes. Section 37A permits the penalty only after giving a reasonable opportunity of being heard.

Section 37A speaks of "penalty under the provisions of this Act" without listing them. The penalty we can identify from the amending text is the one now in section 42(2).

Yes. Section 37B provides an appeal to an appellate authority, an officer at least one rank above, within sixty days from receipt of the order.

It is to be as prescribed. Section 87(2)(oa), added by the Jan Vishwas Act, covers "the manner of holding inquiry and imposing penalty under section 37A". The rules are not in our sources.

Nothing in the text we read says so. Those sections still provide imprisonment and fine, and section 50 still speaks of trial by a Magistrate.