Next due
7 OCTTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Sep 2026in 2 days 11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 6 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 10 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 15 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 25 days 31 OCTITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27in 26 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 55 days 15 DECAdvance Tax · 3rd (75%) instalment · FY 2026-27in 71 days
All due dates

Sections 34-36 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872: Contingent on Future Conduct, Fixed Time and Impossible Events

Section 34: where the event is the way in which a person will act at an unspecified time, it is considered impossible when that person does anything that makes it impossible that...

Published
Updated
Reading time
9 min
Views
3
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Medium Complexity
  • In-Depth Guide
Topic
Contract Law
Published
October 1, 2026
Last updated
Oct 5, 2026
Reading time
9 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Sections 34, 35 and 36 complete Chapter III on contingent contracts. Section 34 says when an event that depends on a person's future conduct is treated as impossible. Section 35 deals with contingent contracts tied to a fixed time. Section 36 makes void a contingent agreement that depends on an impossible event.

Section 34: future conduct of a living person

"If the future event on which a contract is contingent is the way in which a person will act at an unspecified time, the event shall be considered to become impossible when such person does anything which renders it impossible that he should so act within any definite time, or otherwise than under further contingencies."

The heading in the source says "if it is the future conduct of a living person". Elements:

  1. The event is the way in which a person will act, at an unspecified time.
  2. The person does something which renders it impossible that he should so act.
  3. Impossible within any definite time, or otherwise than under further contingencies.

Then the event "shall be considered to become impossible". This links with sections 32 and 33: once the event is considered impossible, a contract contingent on its happening becomes void (s.32), and one contingent on its not happening can be enforced (s.33). See our article on sections 31 to 33.

The Act's illustration. A agrees to pay B a sum of money if B marries C. C marries D. The marriage of B to C must now be considered impossible, although it is possible that D may die and that C may afterwards marry B.

So the Act treats the event as impossible even though a remote chance remains, because it can now happen only "under further contingencies".

If you are tying a payment to what a person will do, our agreement drafting service can help you set it out so that the event and its deadline are clear.

Section 35: fixed time

Section 35 has two paragraphs.

First paragraph (event must happen within a fixed time). "Contingent contracts to do or not to do anything if a specified uncertain event happens within a fixed time become void if, at the expiration of the time fixed, such event has not happened, or if, before the time fixed, such event becomes impossible."

Second paragraph (event must not happen within a fixed time). "Contingent contracts to do or not to do anything, if a specified uncertain event does not happen within a fixed time may be enforced by law when the time fixed has expired and such event has not happened or, before the time fixed has expired, if it becomes certain that such event will not happen."

Contract depends onBecomes voidMay be enforced
Event happening within a fixed timeIf the time expires without the event, or the event becomes impossible before the time(If the event happens, the contract stands to be enforced under the general rule in section 32)
Event not happening within a fixed time(Not stated)When the time has expired and the event has not happened, or earlier if it becomes certain it will not happen

The Act's illustrations to section 35

(a) A promises to pay B a sum of money if a certain ship returns within a year. The contract may be enforced if the ship returns within the year, and becomes void if the ship is burnt within the year.

(b) A promises to pay B a sum of money if a certain ship does not return within a year. The contract may be enforced if the ship does not return within the year, or is burnt within the year.

Illustration (b) shows both limbs of the second paragraph: the time expires without the ship's return, or it becomes certain earlier that the ship will not return.

Section 36: impossible events

"Contingent agreements to do or not to do anything, if an impossible event happens, are void, whether the impossibility of the event is known or not to the parties to the agreement at the time when it is made."

Points to note:

  • It speaks of agreements, not contracts (see section 2(e) to (j)). The agreement is void from the start.
  • The event is impossible when the agreement is made.
  • Knowledge does not matter. It is void "whether the impossibility of the event is known or not to the parties".

Compare section 32, where a valid contingent contract becomes void because the event later becomes impossible. Section 36 deals with an event that is impossible when the agreement is made.

The Act's illustrations to section 36

(a) A agrees to pay B 1,000 rupees if two straight lines should enclose a space. The agreement is void.

(b) A agrees to pay B 1,000 rupees if B will marry A's daughter C. C was dead at the time of the agreement. The agreement is void.

The first event is impossible by its nature; the second was impossible because C was already dead when the agreement was made.

How sections 32, 35 and 36 compare

SectionWhen the event becomes (or is) impossibleResult
32After the contract is madeContract depending on the event happening becomes void
35Before the fixed time endsContract depending on the event happening within the time becomes void
36At the time the agreement is madeAgreement is void

A modern example (ours, not the Act's)

Hamid agrees to pay Isha Rs. 3 lakh if a particular film, which she is producing, is released in cinemas within twelve months. This is a contingent contract tied to a fixed time. If the twelve months pass without release, section 35 says the contract becomes void. If the production is cancelled during the year so that release can no longer happen, it becomes void earlier, as the section says "before the time fixed, such event becomes impossible". Reverse it: Hamid agrees to pay if the film is not released within twelve months; once the year passes without release, section 35's second paragraph allows enforcement.

For section 36: Hamid agrees to pay Isha Rs. 1 lakh if she completes the shooting of a film that, unknown to both, had already been destroyed in a studio fire before the agreement. If the event on which the agreement depends is impossible when the agreement is made, section 36 makes it void whether or not either side knew.

What can the parties change?

The text of these sections does not say the parties may vary them. What parties control is the choice of the event and the time. A clear time limit avoids dispute about whether the event is "unspecified" under section 34. The impossibility rule in section 36 cannot be cured by agreement: an agreement contingent on an impossible event is void whether or not the parties know.

Practical points

  • Fix a time. Section 35 turns on a fixed time; section 34 is for events at an unspecified time.
  • Check the event is possible. Section 36 makes an agreement void if the event was impossible when it was made.
  • Record events that make it impossible. If a person does something that rules out the event, note the date; section 34 treats the event as impossible then.
  • Plan for both outcomes. State what each party must do if the event happens, does not happen or becomes impossible.

Need help drafting time-bound conditions?

If your payments, licences or obligations depend on events within a fixed period, our agreement drafting team can help you write the event, the deadline and the consequences in plain terms so that nobody has to guess what happens at the end of the period.

Key takeaways

  • An event that depends on a person's future conduct is considered impossible when he does something that makes it impossible within any definite time or otherwise than under further contingencies (s.34).
  • A contingent contract tied to a fixed time becomes void if the event does not happen by then or becomes impossible, and one depending on an event not happening within the time may be enforced when the time expires or it becomes certain (s.35).
  • A contingent agreement on an impossible event is void, whether or not the parties know (s.36).
  • The Act's illustrations use marriages, ships, geometry and a person who had already died.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the text of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 as consulted on 1 October 2026. Many questions under this Act turn on case law and on the wording of the particular contract, which this article does not cover. It is general information, not legal advice; check the official text and take advice before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Sections 34-36

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

When is a person's future conduct "impossible" under section 34?

When he does something which renders it impossible that he should so act within any definite time, or otherwise than under further contingencies.

What if the event happens after the fixed time?

Under section 35, a contract contingent on the event happening within a fixed time becomes void if the event has not happened when the time expires.

Read the clause that says what happens when things go wrong; it is the one you will use.

— TaxClue Legal Desk

Sections 34-36: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,327 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

When he does something which renders it impossible that he should so act within any definite time, or otherwise than under further contingencies.

Under section 35, a contract contingent on the event happening within a fixed time becomes void if the event has not happened when the time expires.

Yes, if it becomes certain before the time expires that the event will not happen (s.35).

No. Section 36 says the agreement is void whether or not the impossibility is known.

Section 32 deals with an event that becomes impossible after the contract is made; section 36 with an event impossible when the agreement is made.

Yes, each section carries them; we restate them above.