Next due
7 OCTTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Sep 2026tomorrow 11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 5 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 9 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 14 days 21 OCTTax Audit Report · Form 3CA/3CB · AY 2026-27 · extended from 30 Sepin 15 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 24 days 21 NOVITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27 · extended from 31 Octin 46 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 54 days
All due dates

Sections 32, 33 and 35 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: termination of proceedings, correction of the award and finality

Proceedings end with the final award or by a termination order where the claimant withdraws, the parties agree, or continuation becomes unnecessary or impossible. The mandate ends...

Published
Updated
Reading time
9 min
Views
7
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • High Complexity
  • In-Depth Guide
Topic
Arbitration
Published
October 2, 2026
Last updated
Oct 6, 2026
Reading time
9 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Applies to: FY 2026-27 (AY 2027-28)Verified against: Government sources

These three sections cover what happens once the award stage is reached. Section 32 says how the arbitral proceedings end and when the tribunal's mandate ends. Section 33 allows a short, time-limited request to correct errors, interpret a point or add an omitted claim. Section 35 says the award is final and binding, subject to Part I.

How these sections fit together

An award is not always the end of the tribunal's work: section 33 allows a short window for a correction, an interpretation or an additional award. The window also matters for a challenge, since section 34 sets its own period; see our post on section 34. Section 36 deals with enforcement; see section 36. The form of the award is in section 31; see section 31.

In the India Code consolidated text, sections 32 and 33 close Chapter VI of Part I, "Making of arbitral award and termination of proceedings", and section 35 opens Chapter VIII, "Finality and enforcement of arbitral awards"; section 34 stands between them as Chapter VII. There is no footnote of amendment on sections 32, 33 or 35. Section 33(1)(a) speaks of "any computation errors, any clerical or typographical errors or any other errors of a similar nature occurring in the award", and sub-section (4) of an additional award "as to claims presented in the arbitral proceedings but omitted from the arbitral award". If you are holding an award and have a point to raise, arbitration support can help you decide between a correction request and a section 34 application, and diarise the dates.

Section 32: termination of proceedings

Sub-section (1)

"The arbitral proceedings shall be terminated by the final arbitral award or by an order of the arbitral tribunal under sub-section (2)."

Sub-section (2): when the tribunal issues a termination order

The tribunal "shall issue an order for the termination of the arbitral proceedings" where:

ClauseGround
(a)The claimant withdraws his claim, unless the respondent objects to the order and the tribunal recognises a legitimate interest on his part in obtaining a final settlement of the dispute
(b)The parties agree on the termination of the proceedings
(c)The tribunal finds that the continuation of the proceedings has for any other reason become unnecessary or impossible

A settlement is dealt with in section 30, which separately directs the tribunal to terminate the proceedings on settlement; see section 30. Clause (a) protects a respondent who wants a final answer rather than a withdrawal that leaves the dispute open.

Sub-section (3): the mandate ends

"Subject to section 33 and sub-section (4) of section 34, the mandate of the arbitral tribunal shall terminate with the termination of the arbitral proceedings." So the tribunal does not simply vanish at the final award: section 33 requests may still be made to it, and section 34(4) is also preserved. We do not describe section 34(4) here; our post on section 34 covers section 34.

Section 33: correction, interpretation and additional award

Sub-section (1): thirty days from receipt

"Within thirty days from the receipt of the arbitral award, unless another period of time has been agreed upon by the parties":

  • (a) a party, with notice to the other party, may ask the tribunal to correct any computation errors, any clerical or typographical errors or any other errors of a similar nature occurring in the award;
  • (b) if so agreed by the parties, a party, with notice to the other party, may ask the tribunal to give an interpretation of a specific point or part of the award.

Interpretation needs the parties' agreement. Correction does not. The period runs from receipt of the award, which is why delivery under section 31(5) and receipt under section 3 matter; see sections 3 and 4.

Sub-section (2): the tribunal's response

If the tribunal considers the request justified, it "shall make the correction or give the interpretation within thirty days from the receipt of the request and the interpretation shall form part of the arbitral award."

Sub-section (3): on its own initiative

The tribunal may correct an error of the type in clause (a) of sub-section (1) "on its own initiative, within thirty days from the date of the arbitral award". Note the difference in the starting point: date of the award here, receipt in sub-section (1).

Sub-section (4): additional award

"Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, a party with notice to the other party, may request, within thirty days from the receipt of the arbitral award, the arbitral tribunal to make an additional arbitral award as to claims presented in the arbitral proceedings but omitted from the arbitral award."

Sub-section (5): sixty days

If the tribunal considers the request justified, it "shall make the additional arbitral award within sixty days from the receipt of such request."

Sub-section (6): extension

The tribunal "may extend, if necessary, the period of time within which it shall make a correction, give an interpretation or make an additional arbitral award under sub-section (2) or sub-section (5)." The extension is of the tribunal's own period for acting, not of the thirty days for a party to make the request.

Sub-section (7): section 31 applies

"Section 31 shall apply to a correction or interpretation of the arbitral award or to an additional arbitral award made under this section." So a correction, an interpretation or an additional award must meet section 31 on writing, signature, reasons, date and place and delivery.

The periods in one table

WhatWho actsPeriod as printed
Request to correct errorsParty, with notice to the otherWithin thirty days from receipt of the award, unless another period is agreed
Request for interpretationParty, with notice, if the parties so agreedWithin thirty days from receipt, unless another period is agreed
Tribunal's correction or interpretationTribunalWithin thirty days from receipt of the request
Tribunal's own correctionTribunalWithin thirty days from the date of the award
Request for additional awardParty, with notice, unless otherwise agreedWithin thirty days from receipt of the award
Tribunal's additional awardTribunalWithin sixty days from receipt of the request
Extension of the tribunal's own periodsTribunalIf necessary (sub-section (6))

Section 35: finality

"Subject to this Part an arbitral award shall be final and binding on the parties and persons claiming under them respectively." The words "subject to this Part" matter. The award is final and binding, but recourse under section 34 and enforcement under section 36 are part of the same scheme. Our post on section 34 explains the challenge route. "Persons claiming under them" extends the binding effect beyond the named parties.

A worked example

Chauhan Steel receives an arbitral award on 10 April. The award adds the invoice figures wrongly, so the total awarded is lower than the sum of the items. On 20 April, Chauhan writes to the tribunal and to the other side, asking for correction of the computation error under section 33(1)(a). That is within thirty days from receipt. The tribunal considers the request justified and makes the correction within thirty days of receiving it, and the correction is issued as a section 31-compliant document. Separately, the award omitted a claim for storage charges that Chauhan had pleaded. Within the same thirty days, Chauhan also asks for an additional award under sub-section (4), and the tribunal has sixty days from receiving that request to make it. The corrected award and any additional award then form part of the final and binding position under section 35.

Practical steps

  • Note the date of receipt of the award and diarise thirty days from it.
  • Send any section 33 request with notice to the other party, and keep proof.
  • If you want interpretation, check that the parties have agreed to it; without agreement, sub-section (1)(b) does not apply.
  • Request an additional award only for claims presented in the proceedings but omitted.
  • Decide early whether the issue is a correction, which section 33 handles, or a ground of challenge under section 34.
  • Keep the final award, corrections and any additional award together for enforcement.

Need help with a correction request or an award you wish to question?

A short deadline and a choice between correction and challenge make the first weeks after an award important. Our arbitration support team can review the award, draft the section 33 request and plan the next step with you.

Key takeaways

  • Proceedings end with the final award or a termination order under section 32(2); the mandate ends with them, subject to section 33 and section 34(4).
  • Under section 33, correction and additional-award requests are made within thirty days from receipt of the award, with notice to the other party; interpretation needs the parties' agreement.
  • The tribunal corrects or interprets within thirty days of the request and makes an additional award within sixty days of the request.
  • The tribunal may also correct on its own initiative within thirty days from the date of the award.
  • Under section 35, the award is final and binding, subject to Part I.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the India Code consolidated text of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, whose footnotes show amendments up to Act 3 of 2021 and a latest date of 12 October 2023, as consulted on 2 October 2026. Rules, regulations and notifications under the Act, later amendments and the commencement of the Mediation Act, 2023 should be checked. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Sections 32

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

When do arbitral proceedings end?

With the final award or by a termination order under section 32(2), for example on withdrawal, agreement or if continuation becomes unnecessary or impossible.

How long do I have to ask for a correction?

Within thirty days from receipt of the award, unless the parties agreed another period.

Keep your documents in an order a stranger could follow — one day an officer or auditor will have to.

— TaxClue Compliance Desk

Sections 32: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,350 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

With the final award or by a termination order under section 32(2), for example on withdrawal, agreement or if continuation becomes unnecessary or impossible.

Within thirty days from receipt of the award, unless the parties agreed another period.

Only if the parties so agreed; sub-section (1)(b) provides for interpretation on that basis.

You may request an additional award within thirty days from receipt of the award, and the tribunal has sixty days from the request to make it.

Yes, an error of the type in sub-section (1)(a), within thirty days from the date of the award.

Section 35 says it is final and binding on the parties and persons claiming under them, subject to Part I.