Next due
11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 3 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 7 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 12 days 21 OCTTax Audit Report · Form 3CA/3CB · AY 2026-27 · extended from 30 Sepin 13 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 22 days 7 NOVTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Oct 2026in 30 days 21 NOVITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27 · extended from 31 Octin 44 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 52 days
All due dates
Trademark Live

Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999: Infringement of Registered Trade Marks

A registered trade mark is infringed by a person who is not the registered proprietor or a permitted user and who uses the mark in the course of trade. Sub-section (1): an...

Published
Updated
Reading time
8 min
Views
12
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Low Complexity
  • In-Depth Guide
Topic
Trademark
Published
October 1, 2026
Last updated
Oct 8, 2026
Reading time
8 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Section 29 is the central infringement provision. It has nine sub-sections, and each one describes a different way in which a registered trade mark can be infringed. The first four are the core tests, based on the mark and the goods or services; the rest deal with trade names, ways of using a mark, labelling material, advertising and spoken use.

Who can infringe

Sub-sections (1), (2) and (4) each start with the same words: a person "not being a registered proprietor or a person using by way of permitted use", who "uses in the course of trade". So the registered proprietor, and a person using by way of permitted use, are outside the section, and the use must be in the course of trade. Only a registered mark can be infringed; see section 27 and section 28. If you think your mark is being infringed, a trademark infringement notice is the usual first formal step.

Sub-section (1): identical or deceptively similar mark, same goods or services

A registered trade mark is infringed by a person who uses in the course of trade "a mark which is identical with, or deceptively similar to, the trade mark in relation to goods or services in respect of which the trade mark is registered and in such manner as to render the use of the mark likely to be taken as being used as a trade mark."

Three requirements: (i) the mark is identical or deceptively similar; (ii) the use is for goods or services for which the mark is registered; (iii) the manner of use is such that it is likely to be taken as use as a trade mark. "Deceptively similar" is defined in section 2(1); see definitions in the Trade Marks Act.

Sub-section (2): confusion or association

Infringement where the defendant's mark, because of one of three combinations, "is likely to cause confusion on the part of the public, or which is likely to have an association with the registered trade mark":

ClauseMarksGoods or services
(a)Identity with the registered markSimilarity of goods or services
(b)Similarity to the registered markIdentity or similarity of goods or services
(c)Identity with the registered markIdentity of goods or services

The test is likelihood of confusion on the part of the public or likelihood of association with the registered mark.

Sub-section (3): presumption

"In any case falling under clause (c) of sub-section (2), the court shall presume that it is likely to cause confusion on the part of the public." Where the marks and the goods or services are both identical, the court shall presume confusion. The presumption in the text is confined to clause (c).

Sub-section (4): reputed marks on dissimilar goods

Infringement by a person who uses a mark which:

  • (a) is identical with or similar to the registered mark; and
  • (b) is used in relation to goods or services which are not similar to those for which the mark is registered; and
  • (c) the registered mark has a reputation in India and the use of the mark without due cause takes unfair advantage of, or is detrimental to, the distinctive character or repute of the registered mark.

All three clauses are joined by "and". The reputation must be in India. Well-known marks are discussed in well-known trademarks in India under section 11.

Sub-section (5): use as a trade name

Using the registered mark as one's trade name or part of it, or as the name of one's business concern or part of that name, is infringement where the business deals in goods or services for which the mark is registered.

Sub-section (6): what counts as "use"

"For the purposes of this section, a person uses a registered mark, if, in particular, he":

  • (a) affixes it to goods or their packaging;
  • (b) offers or exposes goods for sale, puts them on the market or stocks them for those purposes under the mark, or offers or supplies services under the mark;
  • (c) imports or exports goods under the mark; or
  • (d) uses the mark on business papers or in advertising.

The words "in particular" show that the list is not exhaustive.

Sub-section (7): applying the mark to labelling or packaging material

Infringement by a person who "applies such registered trade mark to a material intended to be used for labelling or packaging goods, as a business paper, or for advertising goods or services", provided that person, when applying the mark, "knew or had reason to believe that the application of the mark was not duly authorised by the proprietor or a licensee". This is aimed at those who supply the material, such as printers, and the knowledge or reason-to-believe condition applies.

Sub-section (8): advertising

A registered trade mark is infringed by any advertising of that mark if the advertising (a) takes unfair advantage of and is contrary to honest practices in industrial or commercial matters; or (b) is detrimental to its distinctive character; or (c) is against the reputation of the trade mark. The three grounds are alternatives, joined by "or".

Sub-section (9): spoken use

"Where the distinctive elements of a registered trade mark consist of or include words, the trade mark may be infringed by the spoken use of those words as well as by their visual representation and reference in this section to the use of a mark shall be construed accordingly." So spoken use is covered where the distinctive elements are words.

Summary table

Sub-sectionShort descriptionKey test
(1)Identical or deceptively similar mark; goods or services registeredLikely to be taken as used as a trade mark
(2)Three combinations of identity and similarityConfusion or association
(3)Presumption for identical marks and identical goods or servicesCourt shall presume confusion
(4)Reputed mark, dissimilar goodsUnfair advantage or detriment, without due cause
(5)Use as trade nameBusiness in the registered goods or services
(6)Acts that amount to useNot exhaustive
(7)Applying mark to labels, packaging, papers, advertising materialKnowledge or reason to believe
(8)AdvertisingUnfair advantage, detriment or against reputation
(9)Spoken useWords as distinctive elements

Example. Anvi Spices has registered "ANVI GOLD" for spices. Another trader sells turmeric under "ANVI GOLD". That is identity of the mark and of the goods, so sub-section (2)(c) applies and sub-section (3) requires the court to presume likely confusion. If the trader sold cement under a similar name, sub-section (4) would apply only if the mark had a reputation in India and the other conditions were met.

Limits and what follows

Read section 29 with section 30 (uses that are not infringement), section 34 (prior users) and sections 35 and 36. Suits are dealt with in sections 134 and 135. For remedies, see trademark infringement: what constitutes and remedies.

Practical points

  1. Match the facts to the sub-section. The test changes: identical or deceptively similar (1), confusion or association (2), reputation (4).
  2. Collect proof of use (goods, packaging, web pages, advertisements) and keep your registration current.
  3. Check the exceptions first. Section 30 may answer the complaint.

Need help with a suspected infringement?

If a registered mark of yours is being copied, or you have received a notice yourself, the first task is to match the facts to the right sub-section. Our trademark infringement notice team can review the use, draft the notice and advise on next steps.

Key takeaways

  • Only a registered mark can be infringed under section 29.
  • The infringer is a person who is not the registered proprietor or a permitted user and who uses the mark in the course of trade.
  • (1): identical or deceptively similar mark for the registered goods or services; (2): confusion or association; (3): presumption for identical marks and goods; (4): reputed marks on dissimilar goods.
  • (5): trade name; (6): acts of use; (7): labelling material; (8): advertising; (9): spoken use.
  • Read section 29 together with sections 30 and 34.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the Trade Marks Act, 1999 as amended by the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021 and the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2023, as consulted on 1 October 2026. Forms, fees and procedure are set by the Trade Marks Rules, 2017 as amended from time to time. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Section 29

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Who can infringe a registered trade mark?

A person who is not the registered proprietor or a person using by way of permitted use, and who uses the mark in the course of trade.

What is the difference between sub-sections (1) and (2)?

Sub-section (1) deals with identical or deceptively similar marks for the registered goods or services. Sub-section (2) deals with three combinations of identity and similarity of marks and goods or services and asks about confusion or association.

Watch the journal: opposing a conflicting mark is easier than cancelling it later.

— TaxClue IP Desk

Section 29: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,350 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

A person who is not the registered proprietor or a person using by way of permitted use, and who uses the mark in the course of trade.

Sub-section (1) deals with identical or deceptively similar marks for the registered goods or services. Sub-section (2) deals with three combinations of identity and similarity of marks and goods or services and asks about confusion or association.

Under sub-section (3), where the mark and the goods or services are both identical, the court shall presume that confusion is likely.

Yes, under sub-section (4), if the mark has a reputation in India and the use without due cause takes unfair advantage of or is detrimental to its distinctive character or repute.

Under sub-section (5), using it as a trade name or part of a trade name of a business dealing in the registered goods or services is infringement.

Yes, under sub-section (9), where the distinctive elements consist of or include words.