Next due
7 OCTTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Sep 2026in 2 days 11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 6 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 10 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 15 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 25 days 31 OCTITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27in 26 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 55 days 15 DECAdvance Tax · 3rd (75%) instalment · FY 2026-27in 71 days
All due dates
Trademark Live

Madrid Protocol Guidelines of the Trade Marks Registry, Part A: irregularities notified by the International Bureau and how they are answered, and what happens when the basic application or registration ceases to have effect within five years

The International Bureau notifies an irregularity to both the Registry and the applicant. The Registry sorts the irregularities into those the office must cure and those the...

Published
Updated
Reading time
8 min
Views
2
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Low Complexity
  • In-Depth Guide
Topic
Trademark
Published
October 4, 2026
Last updated
Oct 4, 2026
Reading time
8 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

A Madrid application does not end when the Indian Registry transmits it. The International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization checks it again, and may find an irregularity. Separately, for five years the international registration depends on the Indian basic mark, and the Registry has a duty to report if that mark fails. Sections 4 and 5 of the Registry's Guidelines for functioning under the Madrid Protocol describe both. If an international filing has been made through India, this is what to expect afterwards, and the answer often begins with a careful trademark objection reply.

The Guidelines are the Registry's internal guidance and do not have the force of law; the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and the Trade Marks Rules, 2017 as now in force prevail. Check current practice on ipindia.gov.in before relying on any step below.

The law behind the two duties

The Guidelines cite the Trade Marks Rules, 2002; the numbering changed in 2017, and the Madrid chapter is now rules 62 to 74. For the filing side, rules 65 to 67 apply; the Registry's notices and the answers to them are electronic. The Act's provision for the five-year dependency is in section 36D: for five years from the international registration, if the Indian base is withdrawn, cancelled, expired or finally refused, the international protection ceases. The effects, duration and renewal of the international registration are in sections 36F and 36G.

Irregularities notified by the International Bureau

The International Bureau scrutinises every application it receives from an office of origin. If it finds a problem, it notifies it to the office of origin and to the applicant or the applicant's representative. The Guidelines mention an ordinary period for rectification, but it comes from the Protocol's own regulations and the notification states the date, so work from the date on the notification you receive.

The Guidelines then set out the Registry's steps:

  1. The Registry receives the notification online through its system.
  2. The designated officer sorts the irregularities into two groups: those the office should rectify and those the applicant should rectify.
  3. For the applicant's part, a letter is generated and sent electronically to the person who filed, asking for correction. The Guidelines print a short period for this, but that period belongs to the 2002 Rules; use the period in the Registry's letter.
  4. The applicant or agent answers online through the system.
  5. The officer considers the answer.
  6. If no answer comes in time, or the answer is not satisfactory, the officer sends a reminder, together with the officer's suggestion.
  7. The Registry also considers the irregularities meant for the office and acts on them.
  8. On the basis of the applicant's response and its own action, the officer responds to the International Bureau online.

What the applicant should expect: two sources of the same problem, one from the International Bureau, one from the Registry, and one reply path through the Registry. The applicant should answer through the Registry's system and not send a separate letter to the International Bureau, because the Guidelines treat the Registry as the office that replies. The Guidelines say elsewhere that the International Bureau's own scrutiny is limited to formalities, including classification and whether the list of goods and services is comprehensible, so irregularities are likely to fall there. The Registry's letter and its reminder are annexed to the Guidelines as formats; they are not reproduced here.

StageWho actsWhat happens
NotificationInternational BureauSent to the Registry and to the applicant
SortingRegistry officerIrregularities divided between office and applicant
LetterRegistryElectronic letter asks the applicant to cure its part
AnswerApplicant or agentFiled online through the Registry's system
ReminderRegistryIf no answer or an unsatisfactory one, a reminder with a suggestion
ReplyRegistryResponse sent to the International Bureau online

When the basic mark ceases to have effect

The Introduction and Section 5 of the Guidelines state the dependency in plain terms: for five years, if the basic application or registration ceases to exist, the protection resulting from the international registration is lost, and the office of origin must say so to the International Bureau. In practice this is the "central attack" that international brand owners watch for: an opposition, cancellation or refusal in India can undo protection abroad.

The Guidelines describe what the Registry's officer reports:

  • the number of the international registration and the holder's name;
  • the facts and decisions affecting the basic application, the registration that resulted from it, or the basic registration, and the date each takes effect;
  • if only some goods or services are affected, which are affected or which are not.

Two limits are worth knowing. If a refusal, withdrawal or cancellation touches the basic mark only for goods that the international registration does not cover, no report is made. And the Registry also reports before the five years end if it is aware that any of the following is still pending against the basic mark: a court action concerning the basic registration, an action for revocation or cancellation, an appeal against a refusal of the basic application, a request to withdraw the application, or an opposition to the basic application. That early notice must say that the action has not yet produced a final decision, and once the decision becomes final the officer notifies it promptly.

On receipt, the International Bureau records the notification, passes copies to the holder and the designated countries, and, if the notice asks for cancellation, cancels the international registration to that extent.

The mirror image, where India is a designated country and protection in India is lost, is in rules 70 to 74: rule 70 requires the Registrar to notify the International Bureau when protection in India ceases or is varied following legal proceedings under the Act.

What the holder should do

  • Keep the Indian basic mark alive and in order for the whole five years. Oppositions, objections and rectification applications may arise in that time.
  • Watch the Journal for the Indian basic application and answer objections on time. A refusal of the basic application cuts down the international protection.
  • If the basic mark is attacked, seek advice early on whether a narrower Indian specification is better than a lost one.
  • Give the Registry current contact details, because letters about irregularities go by email.

A worked example

Lumora Teas Pvt Ltd's international application is transmitted. The International Bureau finds that the description of one product in the goods list is unclear and notifies both the Registry and Lumora. The Registry's officer decides that this irregularity is Lumora's to cure and sends an electronic letter. Lumora's agent clarifies the description online. The officer considers the reply and responds to the International Bureau. Two years later, an opposition to Lumora's Indian basic application is still pending. The Registry sends the International Bureau a notice that the action has not yet produced a final decision. When the opposition is finally decided against Lumora for one of the two classes, the Registry notifies the decision and the international protection is cut to that extent.

Need help with an irregularity or a threatened basic mark?

An irregularity notice and a pending attack on the basic mark both move quickly. A trademark objection reply specialist can prepare the answer for the Registry and review the Indian basic mark's exposure.

Key takeaways

  • The International Bureau notifies irregularities to both the Registry and the applicant.
  • The Registry splits them between office and applicant, writes to the applicant, and replies to the International Bureau.
  • Answer through the Registry's system, within the date in the letter.
  • For five years the international registration depends on the Indian basic mark.
  • The Registry reports a failure of the basic mark, and also reports pending attacks with a note that no final decision exists.
  • Rule 70 covers the reverse case, where India is designated.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the documents of the Trade Marks Registry named in the article (the draft Manual of Trade Marks Practice and Procedure published for comments on 10 March 2015, the Registry's standard operating procedures and its Guidelines for functioning under the Madrid Protocol), as consulted on 4 October 2026. A draft is not final; none of these documents has the force of law; the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and the Trade Marks Rules, 2017 as now in force prevail and current practice should be checked on ipindia.gov.in. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Madrid

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Who receives the International Bureau's irregularity notice?

Both the Indian Registry and the applicant or representative.

Where should I send my answer?

Through the Registry's system, as the Guidelines describe. The Registry then replies to the International Bureau.

What is not written down will be remembered differently by everyone involved.

— TaxClue Compliance Desk

Madrid: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,327 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

Both the Indian Registry and the applicant or representative.

Through the Registry's system, as the Guidelines describe. The Registry then replies to the International Bureau.

The Guidelines say the officer sends a reminder with a suggestion. Do not rely on it: use the date in the letter.

For five years from the international registration, if the Indian basic mark ceases to exist, the international protection is lost to the same extent.

Yes. The Registry reports pending actions against the basic mark to the International Bureau, noting that no final decision exists yet.

Only if it touches goods that the international registration covers.