Next due
7 OCTTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Sep 2026tomorrow 11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 5 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 9 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 14 days 21 OCTTax Audit Report · Form 3CA/3CB · AY 2026-27 · extended from 30 Sepin 15 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 24 days 21 NOVITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27 · extended from 31 Octin 46 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 54 days
All due dates

Sections 215 and 216 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872: Agent Dealing on Own Account and the Principal's Right to the Benefit

If an agent deals on his own account in the business of the agency, without first obtaining the principal's consent and acquainting him with all material circumstances known to...

Published
Updated
Reading time
8 min
Views
6
Questions
5 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Medium Complexity
  • In-Depth Guide
Topic
Contract Law
Published
October 1, 2026
Last updated
Oct 5, 2026
Reading time
8 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

An agent who is supposed to act for his principal may be tempted to deal for himself in the same business. Section 215 deals with the case where he does so without first obtaining the principal's consent and acquainting him with all material circumstances: the principal may repudiate the transaction in two situations. Section 216 deals with the case where the agent deals on his own account without the principal's knowledge: the principal may claim any benefit that resulted.

Section 215: the principal may repudiate

The text: "If an agent deals on his own account in the business of the agency, without first obtaining the consent of his principal and acquainting him with all material circumstances which have come to his own knowledge on the subject, the principal may repudiate the transaction, if the case shows, either that any material fact has been dishonestly concealed from him by the agent, or that the dealings of the agent have been disadvantageous to him."

The structure has a condition and a two-way test.

PartWords
ConditionThe agent deals on his own account in the business of the agency, without first (a) obtaining the principal's consent and (b) acquainting him with all material circumstances which have come to the agent's knowledge
Test (either one)A material fact has been dishonestly concealed from the principal by the agent; or the dealings of the agent have been disadvantageous to the principal
ResultThe principal may repudiate the transaction

Note that both parts of the condition (consent and disclosure) must have been missing for the condition to be met on the words "without first obtaining the consent ... and acquainting him". And the principal's right to repudiate arises only "if the case shows" one of the two matters. Merely dealing on own account does not by itself give the right on this section's words.

The Act's illustrations (s.215).

(a) A directs B to sell A's estate. B buys the estate for himself in the name of C. A, on discovering that B has bought the estate for himself, may repudiate the sale, if he can show that B has dishonestly concealed any material fact, or that the sale has been disadvantageous to him.

(b) A directs B to sell A's estate. B, on looking over the estate before selling it, finds a mine on the estate which is unknown to A. B informs A that he wishes to buy the estate for himself, but conceals the discovery of the mine. A allows B to buy, in ignorance of the existence of the mine. A, on discovering that B knew of the mine at the time he bought the estate, may either repudiate or adopt the sale at his option.

Illustration (b) is instructive: B told A he wanted to buy, so A gave consent, but B concealed the mine, a material fact. Consent without all the material circumstances is not enough, and A may repudiate or adopt.

If you are appointing someone to sell or buy for you and want them to disclose any personal interest, a legal notice drafting adviser can help you if a repudiation notice becomes necessary.

Section 216: the principal may claim the benefit

The text: "If an agent, without the knowledge of his principal, deals in the business of the agency on his own account instead of on account of his principal, the principal is entitled to claim from the agent any benefit which may have resulted to him from the transaction."

The Act's illustration (s.216). A directs B, his agent, to buy a certain house for him. B tells A it cannot be bought, and buys the house for himself. A may, on discovering that B has bought the house, compel him to sell it to A at the price he gave for it.

Notice the differences between the two sections.

PointSection 215Section 216
FactAgent deals on own account without consent and full disclosureAgent deals on own account "without the knowledge of his principal", "instead of on account of his principal"
Principal's remedyMay repudiate the transaction, if dishonest concealment or disadvantage is shownEntitled to claim from the agent any benefit resulting to him
Extra conditionMust show concealment or disadvantageNone stated in the section

The two sections do not say whether a principal may use both for the same transaction; the text speaks of each remedy separately.

A modern example (ours, not the Act's)

Anand Mehta instructs Pooja, a property broker in Gurugram, to find a buyer for his flat. Pooja quietly buys the flat through her brother, telling Anand nothing of the prospect of a new road that she knows will raise values. She dealt on her own account in the business of the agency, without his consent and without telling him the material circumstance. Under section 215, if the case shows that a material fact was dishonestly concealed, or that the dealing was disadvantageous to Anand, he may repudiate the transaction.

In a different case, Anand tells another broker, Wasim, to buy a shop for him. Wasim reports that the shop cannot be bought and buys it for himself. As in the Act's illustration under section 216, Anand, on discovering this, is entitled to claim from Wasim the benefit, and the Act's illustration shows that he can compel Wasim to sell the shop to him at the price Wasim paid.

What the agent may keep out of money he receives for the principal is a different question, dealt with in sections 217 to 221.

What can the parties change?

Both sections turn on the principal's consent and knowledge, so the principal can allow the agent to deal on his own account, in which case the first condition of section 215 is not met if consent and full disclosure are given. A contract can set out in advance when and how an agent may deal for himself, what he must disclose, and what happens if he does not. The sections themselves are silent on a contract clause that permits an agent to keep any profit without disclosure; this article does not go beyond the text, and such a clause should be read carefully.

Practical points

  • Principals: state in the agency contract whether the agent may deal for himself, and require disclosure of any interest.
  • Agents: if you want to buy or sell for yourself in the agency's business, get consent and disclose everything material, in writing.
  • If you discover self-dealing: act promptly; for section 215 you must show dishonest concealment of a material fact or disadvantage.
  • Section 211 says an agent who acts otherwise than as directed must account for profit; see our article on section 211.

Need help after discovering self-dealing by an agent?

If you believe an agent has dealt for himself behind your back, our legal notice drafting service can help you prepare a notice that sets out the facts and the remedies under sections 215 and 216. Other laws may also apply.

Key takeaways

  • An agent who deals on his own account in the business of the agency without first obtaining the principal's consent and acquainting him with all material circumstances may have the transaction repudiated by the principal, if a material fact was dishonestly concealed or the dealings were disadvantageous to him (s.215).
  • An agent who deals on his own account without the principal's knowledge must yield any benefit resulting to him to the principal (s.216).
  • The Act's illustrations: an agent who buys the estate he was told to sell, concealing a mine; an agent who says a house cannot be bought and buys it himself.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the text of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 as consulted on 1 October 2026. Many questions under this Act turn on case law and on the wording of the particular contract, which this article does not cover. It is general information, not legal advice; check the official text and take advice before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Sections 215 and 216

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Can an agent buy the property he was told to sell?

Section 215 says that if he deals on his own account without first obtaining the principal's consent and acquainting him with all material circumstances, the principal may repudiate the transaction if a material fact was dishonestly concealed or the dealings were disadvantageous to him.

What if the principal agreed but the agent hid an important fact?

In the Act's illustration (b) under section 215, A agreed to the sale but B concealed the mine. A may either repudiate or adopt the sale at his option.

Know which registrations your business actually needs — both too few and too many cost money.

— TaxClue Compliance Desk

Sections 215 and 216: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,350 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 5 questions readers ask most on this topic.

Section 215 says that if he deals on his own account without first obtaining the principal's consent and acquainting him with all material circumstances, the principal may repudiate the transaction if a material fact was dishonestly concealed or the dealings were disadvantageous to him.

In the Act's illustration (b) under section 215, A agreed to the sale but B concealed the mine. A may either repudiate or adopt the sale at his option.

He is entitled to claim from the agent any benefit which may have resulted to him from the transaction.

The section speaks of dealing on own account "without the knowledge of his principal"; it does not state the concealment or disadvantage test found in section 215.

In the Act's illustration (b) under section 215, A may either repudiate or adopt the sale at his option.