Next due
7 OCTTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Sep 2026in 2 days 11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 6 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 10 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 15 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 25 days 31 OCTITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27in 26 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 55 days 15 DECAdvance Tax · 3rd (75%) instalment · FY 2026-27in 71 days
All due dates

Section 21 of the Cost Accountants Act, 1959: the Disciplinary Directorate and how complaints and information are examined, with the 2022 procedure not yet in force

In force today (the 2006 text): the Council establishes, by notification, a Disciplinary Directorate headed by the Director (Discipline). On a complaint with the prescribed fee...

Published
Updated
Reading time
8 min
Views
6
Questions
7 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Medium Complexity
  • In-Depth Guide
Topic
Professional Ethics
Published
October 3, 2026
Last updated
Oct 4, 2026
Reading time
8 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Section 21 is the entry point of the disciplinary system for cost accountants. The Disciplinary Directorate, headed by the Director (Discipline), examines every complaint or piece of information and decides where it goes next. The 2022 Amendment Act substituted a longer section 21, but that substitution is enacted and not yet in force. The Act was called the Cost and Works Accountants Act, 1959 until 10 May 2022.

How this article reads the Act

This article follows the Act as printed by the Institute (as amended in 2011), read with the 2022 Amendment Act to the extent brought into force by S.O. 2184(E) dated 10 May 2022. Section 56 of the 2022 Act, which substitutes section 21, is not among the provisions brought into force. A later commencement notification should be checked; none was found in the sources consulted. The Appellate Authority and civil-court powers are in sections 22A to 22E and our article on section 21C.

Section 21 in force: the 2006 text

Section 21(1): the Directorate. The Council shall, by notification, establish a Disciplinary Directorate headed by an officer of the Institute designated as Director (Discipline), with such other employees, for making investigations in respect of any information or complaint received by it.

Section 21(2): prima facie opinion. On receipt of any information or complaint along with the prescribed fee, the Director (Discipline) arrives at a prima facie opinion on whether the alleged misconduct occurred. The fee and its amount are in the regulations, not in this series.

Section 21(3): where the case goes. If the Director (Discipline) is of the opinion that a member is guilty of professional or other misconduct mentioned in the First Schedule, he places the matter before the Board of Discipline. If the opinion is that the misconduct is in the Second Schedule, or in both Schedules, he places it before the Disciplinary Committee.

Section 21(4): procedure. To make investigations, the Disciplinary Directorate follows such procedure as may be specified (by rules of the Central Government).

Section 21(5): withdrawal. Where a complainant withdraws the complaint, the Director (Discipline) places the withdrawal before the Board of Discipline or the Disciplinary Committee, as the case may be, and that Board or Committee may permit the withdrawal at any stage if it thinks the circumstances so warrant.

Section 21 as enacted in 2022 (not in force)

Section 56 of Act 12 of 2022 substitutes a nine-sub-section section 21:

Sub-sectionWhat the 2022 text says
(1)The Council establishes by notification a Disciplinary Directorate of a Director (Discipline), at least two Joint Directors (Discipline) not below the rank of Deputy Secretary, and other employees appointed under section 16, to investigate either suo motu or on receipt of information or a complaint, in such manner and with such fees as may be specified
(2)Within thirty days of receipt, the Director decides whether the complaint or information is actionable or liable to be closed as non-actionable. First proviso: he may ask the complainant for more information, giving fifteen days. Second proviso: recommendations on non-actionable matters go to the Board of Discipline within sixty days, which may send them back for further investigation
(3)In an actionable case, the member or firm gets an opportunity to file a written statement within twenty-one days, extendable by another twenty-one days for reasons recorded in writing
(4)A copy of the statement goes to the complainant, who files a rejoinder within twenty-one days
(5)After the statement and rejoinder, the Director submits a preliminary examination report within thirty days if a prima facie case is made out
(6)First Schedule misconduct: report to the Board of Discipline; Second Schedule or both: report to the Disciplinary Committee. First proviso: a complaint or information by an authorised officer of the Central or a State Government or any statutory authority, supported by an investigation report or relevant extract with evidence, is treated as the preliminary examination report. Second proviso: if no prima facie case, the Director sends the matter to the Board, which may close it, proceed itself, refer it to the Disciplinary Committee or advise further investigation
(7)The Directorate follows such procedure as may be specified
(8)A complaint filed with the Disciplinary Directorate shall not be withdrawn under any circumstances
(9)The status of actionable information and complaints pending before the Directorate, Boards and Committees, and the orders passed by them, shall be made available in the public domain in the prescribed manner

The main differences

PointIn force (2006)Enacted 2022, not in force
Who may start a caseInformation or complaint, with prescribed feeAlso suo motu
Time to triageNone statedThirty days
Respondent's replyNot stated in this sectionTwenty-one days, plus up to twenty-one more
FirmsNot mentionedMember or firm
WithdrawalAllowed with the Board's or Committee's permissionNot allowed
PublicityNot statedStatus and orders in the public domain

Until a notification brings the 2022 text into force, the 2006 sub-sections (1) to (5) are the operative law. Two of the 2022 terms, "Director (Discipline)" and "Disciplinary Directorate", already appear in the in-force definitions in section 2(1) as inserted in 2022; see our article on section 2.

What a complainant and a member should expect now

For a complainant. Under the in-force text you file the information or complaint with the prescribed fee. The Director forms a prima facie opinion and routes the case to the Board or the Committee by Schedule. If you later withdraw, you need permission; the Act does not promise that permission will be given.

For a member. The Act in force does not set a period for your reply in this section; the procedure is "specified", and you should check the rules. If the matter reaches the Board of Discipline or Disciplinary Committee, you are entitled to be heard before an order; see section 21A and section 21B.

A short example

Priya Nambiar, a cost accountant, certifies a cost statement without examining the records. A company director files a complaint with the Disciplinary Directorate with the prescribed fee. The Director (Discipline) forms a prima facie opinion that the conduct falls under the Second Schedule and places the matter before the Disciplinary Committee. If the complainant then asks to withdraw, the Committee decides whether to allow it. Under the enacted but not-in-force 2022 text the withdrawal would not be possible.

A member who has received notice of a complaint, or a complainant who wants to frame one, can get help through legal dispute resolution support.

The same rule for chartered accountants

For the shared mechanism see Section 21 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. The cost accountants' provision has its own in-force 2006 text and its own 2022 text, as set out above.

Need help with a complaint?

If you are facing a complaint under Chapter V or want to file one, our legal dispute resolution team can help you read section 21 with the Schedules and the specified procedure.

Key takeaways

  • In force: a Disciplinary Directorate headed by the Director (Discipline) forms a prima facie opinion and routes cases by Schedule.
  • First Schedule goes to the Board of Discipline; Second or both go to the Disciplinary Committee.
  • A withdrawal needs the Board's or Committee's permission today.
  • The 2022 section 21 is enacted but not in force: thirty-day triage, written statements in twenty-one days, no withdrawal, public status.
  • Check for a later commencement notification.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the Cost and Works Accountants Act, 1959 (now the Cost Accountants Act, 1959) as printed by the Institute of Cost Accountants of India (as amended in 2011), read with the Chartered Accountants, the Cost and Works Accountants and the Company Secretaries (Amendment) Act, 2022 to the extent brought into force by S.O. 2184(E) dated 10 May 2022, as consulted on 3 October 2026. Regulations, rules, later amendments and commencement notifications should be checked. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Section 21

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Who investigates complaints against cost accountants?

The Disciplinary Directorate, headed by the Director (Discipline), under section 21(1).

Does the complaint need a fee?

Section 21(2) in force speaks of the prescribed fee; the amount is in the regulations.

Good compliance is boring by design; the drama starts only when something has been skipped.

— TaxClue Compliance Desk

Section 21: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,327 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 7 questions readers ask most on this topic.

The Disciplinary Directorate, headed by the Director (Discipline), under section 21(1).

Section 21(2) in force speaks of the prescribed fee; the amount is in the regulations.

The Board of Discipline. Second Schedule or both Schedules go to the Disciplinary Committee.

Under the in-force section 21(5), with the permission of the Board or Committee at any stage. The 2022 text, not in force, says a complaint cannot be withdrawn under any circumstances.

The in-force text speaks of information or a complaint received; the "suo motu" power is in the 2022 text, which is not in force.

No. As per S.O. 2184(E) dated 10 May 2022, section 56 of the 2022 Act was not brought into force.

Under the 2022 section 21(9) they would be, but that text is not in force.