Next due
7 OCTTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Sep 2026in 4 days 11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 8 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 12 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 17 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 27 days 31 OCTITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27in 28 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 57 days 15 DECAdvance Tax · 3rd (75%) instalment · FY 2026-27in 73 days
All due dates
Legal Live

Section 2(1)(c) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015: Meaning of Commercial Dispute

A commercial dispute is a dispute "arising out of" one of the heads in items (i) to (xxii) of section 2(1)(c). The heads run from ordinary transactions of merchants, bankers...

Published
Updated
Reading time
7 min
Views
2
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Medium Complexity
Topic
Legal
Published
October 2, 2026
Last updated
Oct 2, 2026
Reading time
7 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Whether a dispute is a "commercial dispute" decides whether the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 can apply to it at all. Section 2(1)(c) answers by listing twenty-two heads of dispute and adding an Explanation on two situations that do not take a dispute out of the list. This article reads clause (c) as amended up to 3 May 2018, as per the text consulted, and helps you place a real contract dispute against it before you plan a commercial suit filing.

The structure of the clause

Clause (c) says a commercial dispute "means a dispute arising out of" the listed heads. Two points follow from the wording. First, the test is the source of the dispute, not the label the parties give it. Second, the clause alone is not enough: the Act also needs the dispute to be of a Specified Value, which is covered in our article on determination of Specified Value.

The twenty-two heads

The table below keeps the printed items in order and gives a plain-language note on each.

ItemHead as printed (shortened)Plain note
(i)Ordinary transactions of merchants, bankers, financiers and traders, such as those relating to mercantile documents, including their enforcement and interpretationMercantile documents and their enforcement or interpretation
(ii)Export or import of merchandise or servicesCross-border sale and service contracts
(iii)Admiralty and maritime lawShipping and maritime claims
(iv)Aircraft, aircraft engines, aircraft equipment and helicopters, including sales, leasing and financingAviation asset deals
(v)Carriage of goodsFreight and transport contracts
(vi)Construction and infrastructure contracts, including tendersWorks contracts and tender disputes
(vii)Agreements relating to immovable property used exclusively in trade or commerceCommercial premises only
(viii)Franchising agreementsFranchisor and franchisee disputes
(ix)Distribution and licensing agreementsDealer, distributor and licence terms
(x)Management and consultancy agreementsService and advisory contracts
(xi)Joint venture agreementsDisputes between venturers
(xii)Shareholders agreementsDisputes among shareholders under an agreement
(xiii)Subscription and investment agreements pertaining to the services industry, including outsourcing services and financial servicesInvestor and service-sector deals
(xiv)Mercantile agency and mercantile usageAgents and trade custom
(xv)Partnership agreementsPartner disputes under an agreement
(xvi)Technology development agreementsDevelopment and technology contracts
(xvii)Intellectual property rights relating to registered and unregistered trademarks, copyright, patent, design, domain names, geographical indications and semiconductor integrated circuitsIP disputes of the listed kinds
(xviii)Agreements for sale of goods or provision of servicesThe widest everyday head
(xix)Exploitation of oil and gas reserves or other natural resources including electromagnetic spectrumResource contracts
(xx)Insurance and re-insurancePolicy and treaty disputes
(xxi)Contracts of agency relating to any of the aboveAgency under any listed head
(xxii)Such other commercial disputes as may be notified by the Central GovernmentAnything added by notification

No notification under item (xxii) is part of the text consulted, so this article lists none.

How to read the heads

Item (i) is wide. It speaks of "ordinary transactions" of merchants, bankers, financiers and traders. A dispute over mercantile documents, including their enforcement and interpretation, is the text's own example.

Item (vii) is narrow. It covers agreements relating to immovable property "used exclusively in trade or commerce". The word "exclusively" is part of the printed test, so a lease of premises that serve a mixed purpose needs careful reading before anyone assumes this head applies.

Item (xvii) names the IP rights. Trademarks (registered and unregistered), copyright, patent, design, domain names, geographical indications and semiconductor integrated circuits are listed. The specific statutes that govern infringement suits are separate; see our posts on section 134 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and section 104 of the Patents Act, 1970 for the general rule.

Item (xviii) is the everyday head. Any agreement for sale of goods or provision of services falls here. A supplier chasing unpaid invoices, or a buyer alleging defective supply, will usually argue under this head.

The Explanation: two things that do not change the character

A commercial dispute "shall not cease to be a commercial dispute merely because":

  • (a) it also involves an action for recovery of immovable property, or for realisation of monies out of immovable property given as security, or involves any other relief pertaining to immovable property; or
  • (b) one of the contracting parties is the State or any of its agencies or instrumentalities, or a private body carrying out public functions.

So a claim that also seeks realisation of monies out of immovable property given as security, or a supply contract with a public sector buyer, is not pushed out of the Act only for those reasons. The word "merely" is the limit: the dispute must still arise out of a listed head.

Practical examples

Example 1. Kaveri Exports Pvt Ltd ships garments to a buyer abroad and the buyer rejects the consignment. The dispute arises out of export of merchandise (item (ii)) and also out of an agreement for sale of goods (item (xviii)). Either head is enough.

Example 2. Apex Builders enters a works contract with a municipal body after a tender and the municipal body withholds payment. Item (vi) covers construction contracts, including tenders, and Explanation (b) says that the public body as a party does not by itself change the character of the dispute.

Example 3. A family quarrel over residential property between two cousins does not arise out of any listed head, because item (vii) needs property used exclusively in trade or commerce.

Points to check in the text

  • The Explanation has items (a) and (b) only in the copy consulted.
  • The clause letters of section 2(1) run (a), (aa), (b), (c), (d) to (i); that is a feature of the printed text.
  • The text is silent on any decision about borderline cases; this article gives no case law.

For disputes that sit between this Act and another route, such as a delayed payment to a micro or small supplier, the general routes are explained in our post on MSME Samadhaan. Which route suits a claim depends on the facts.

Need help with deciding whether your claim is a commercial dispute?

Placing a claim against the heads in clause (c) is often the first step in a recovery or breach-of-contract matter. If you want a second pair of eyes before filing, see our commercial suit filing page for how we work.

Key takeaways

  • A commercial dispute is one arising out of the twenty-two heads of section 2(1)(c).
  • Item (xxii) allows the Central Government to notify other commercial disputes.
  • The Explanation keeps a dispute commercial even when it also involves immovable property relief or when the State or a public body is a party.
  • Value is tested separately under section 2(1)(i) and section 12.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on a text of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 as amended up to 3 May 2018 and on the Ninth Schedule to the Mediation Act, 2023 as enacted, as consulted on 2 October 2026. Later amendments, the current Specified Value, the pre-institution mediation rules and High Court rules should be checked. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Section 2

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

What is a commercial dispute under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015?

A dispute arising out of the heads listed in items (i) to (xxii) of section 2(1)(c), read with the Explanation.

Is every contract dispute a commercial dispute?

No. The dispute must arise out of a listed head. Many contracts will fit item (xviii) (sale of goods or provision of services), but the heads are the test.

Define the scope, the price, the time and the exit — most disputes are about one of the four.

— TaxClue Legal Desk

Section 2: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
11,561 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

A dispute arising out of the heads listed in items (i) to (xxii) of section 2(1)(c), read with the Explanation.

No. The dispute must arise out of a listed head. Many contracts will fit item (xviii) (sale of goods or provision of services), but the heads are the test.

Under Explanation (b), a dispute does not cease to be commercial merely because the State or one of its agencies or instrumentalities, or a private body carrying out public functions, is a contracting party.

Explanation (a) says a dispute does not cease to be commercial merely because it also involves recovery of immovable property, realisation of monies out of property given as security or other property relief. Item (vii) separately covers agreements relating to immovable property used exclusively in trade or commerce.

Item (xxii) refers to such other commercial disputes as may be notified by the Central Government. No such notification is in the text consulted.

The clause defines the subject. The Act also uses the Specified Value test in section 2(1)(i); section 12 sets out how that value is determined.