Next due
7 OCTTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Sep 2026in 3 days 11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 7 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 11 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 16 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 26 days 31 OCTITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27in 27 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 56 days 15 DECAdvance Tax · 3rd (75%) instalment · FY 2026-27in 72 days
All due dates

Section 135 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872: Discharge of Surety When Creditor Compounds With, Gives Time To, or Agrees Not to Sue, Principal Debtor

A contract between the creditor and the principal debtor, by which the creditor makes a composition with, or promises to give time to, or not to sue, the principal debtor...

Published
Updated
Reading time
6 min
Views
4
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Medium Complexity
Topic
Contract Law
Published
October 1, 2026
Last updated
Oct 3, 2026
Reading time
6 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Section 135 deals with three kinds of deal between a creditor and a principal debtor: a composition, a promise to give time, and a promise not to sue. Each discharges the surety, unless the surety assents. If you hold a guarantee or have stood surety and the creditor has arranged something with the borrower, our legal dispute resolution service can help you assess the position.

The text

Section 135 reads: "A contract between the creditor and the principal debtor, by which the creditor makes a composition with, or promises to give time to, or not to sue, the principal debtor, discharges the surety, unless the surety assents to such contract."

Surety, principal debtor and creditor are defined in section 126; see section 126.

The elements

ElementWords of the sectionPoints to note
A contract"A contract between the creditor and the principal debtor"It must be a contract with the principal debtor.
Composition"makes a composition with"The text does not define "composition"; read plainly, an arrangement to accept less or something different in settlement of the debt.
Time"promises to give time to"A promise, not just waiting.
Not to sue"promises ... not to sue"A promise not to bring proceedings against the debtor.
Effect"discharges the surety"The surety's liability ends.
Exception"unless the surety assents to such contract"Assent by the surety saves the creditor's position.

The section does not state a time limit within which the surety must assent, nor does it say the assent must be in writing. It simply says "assents".

Where section 135 sits among its neighbours

  • Section 133 deals with variance in the terms of the main contract.
  • Section 134 deals with release of the principal debtor.
  • Section 135 (this article) deals with composition, giving time and agreeing not to sue, by contract.
  • Section 136 deals with giving time through a contract with a third person, and section 137 with mere forbearance to sue; both leave the surety undischarged. See sections 136 to 138.

The Act prints no illustration under section 135 itself. The nearest illustrations are under section 134 (a composition with creditors) and section 136 (a contract to give time with a third person).

Reading sections 135 and 137 together

Section 137 says: "Mere forbearance on the part of the creditor to sue the principal debtor or to enforce any other remedy against him does not, in the absence of any provision in the guarantee to the contrary, discharge the surety." Its illustration: B owes C a debt for which A is surety; the debt becomes payable; C does not sue B for a year; A is not discharged.

The difference is a promise versus plain inaction. Under section 135 the creditor makes a contract with the debtor, promising time or not to sue. Under section 137 the creditor simply does not act. The first discharges the surety unless he assents; the second does not discharge him.

A modern example of our own

Kavita lends money to Ramesh's firm, and Imran is surety for repayment. On the due date Ramesh asks for more time, and Kavita signs a letter agreeing not to demand repayment for six months. Imran does not know. Under section 135 this is a contract by which the creditor promises to give time to the principal debtor, so Imran is discharged unless he assents to it. If Imran had signed the letter as well, or later agreed in writing, the exception would apply.

Compare: Kavita simply lets the due date pass for six months without a promise to Ramesh and without suing. Section 137 treats that as mere forbearance, which does not discharge Imran unless the guarantee itself provides otherwise.

What can the parties change?

The "unless the surety assents" wording is the Act's own opening for the surety to keep his liability alive. Section 137 expressly recognises that the guarantee may contain a provision to the contrary. Section 135 contains no such words, so this article does not suggest that a clause in the guarantee can alter it; the text is silent on this, and a drafted clause should be reviewed with advice. Creditors commonly seek the surety's written assent at the time of any change, which is the safest way to rely on the exception in the section.

Practical points

  • Creditors: before agreeing an extension, a settlement or a standstill with the borrower, obtain the surety's assent and keep it in writing.
  • Sureties: if you receive a request to assent, read what exactly you are being asked to agree to. Your assent keeps your liability alive.
  • Borrowers: a request for time is a contract of the kind section 135 describes; the surety's position may be affected.
  • Keep dates on every document so it is clear what was promised and when.

Need help with an extension or settlement involving a guarantee?

Where a creditor has agreed something with the borrower, whether the surety is discharged depends on the exact promise made and on whether the surety assented. Our legal dispute resolution team can review the correspondence and the guarantee and explain how section 135 applies. Bring the guarantee, the loan papers and any letters about time or settlement.

Key takeaways

  • A contract in which the creditor makes a composition with, promises time to, or promises not to sue the principal debtor discharges the surety (s.135).
  • The surety is not discharged if he assents to that contract.
  • Mere forbearance to sue is different and does not discharge the surety unless the guarantee says otherwise (s.137).
  • The Act prints no illustration under section 135 itself.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the text of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 as consulted on 1 October 2026. Many questions under this Act turn on case law and on the wording of the particular contract, which this article does not cover. It is general information, not legal advice; check the official text and take advice before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Section 135

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

What does section 135 cover?

A contract between creditor and principal debtor by which the creditor makes a composition with, gives time to, or promises not to sue the debtor.

Is the surety always discharged?

Not if the surety assents to the contract (s.135, last words).

A pleading should state facts in the order a stranger would need to understand them.

— TaxClue Legal Desk

Section 135: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,327 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

A contract between creditor and principal debtor by which the creditor makes a composition with, gives time to, or promises not to sue the debtor.

Not if the surety assents to the contract (s.135, last words).

No. Section 137 treats mere forbearance as not discharging the surety, in the absence of a provision in the guarantee to the contrary.

No. It says only "assents". The form is not stated.

Section 136 says the surety is not discharged where the contract to give time is made with a third person and not with the principal debtor.

No. The Act prints illustrations under sections 134 and 136, which sit on either side.