Next duePayroll
15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 6 days 31 OCTForm 24Q / 26Q · TDS return · Jul–Sep 2026in 22 days 7 NOVTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Oct 2026in 29 days 15 JUNForm 16 · Salary TDS certificate · FY 2026-27in 249 days 11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 2 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 11 days 21 OCTTax Audit Report · Form 3CA/3CB · AY 2026-27 · extended from 30 Sepin 12 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 21 days
All due dates
Trademark Live

Sections 110–112 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999: Defences, Forfeiture of Goods and Employees' Exemption

No offence under ss.102–105 arises where the act is permitted under the Act or under another law. A court that convicts, or acquits on certain proofs, may direct forfeiture to...

Published
Updated
Reading time
7 min
Views
7
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Low Complexity
Topic
Trademark
Published
October 1, 2026
Last updated
Oct 8, 2026
Reading time
7 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

These three sections sit at the end of the offences group. Section 110 says when no offence under sections 102 to 105 is made out, section 111 lets a criminal court forfeit goods to the Government, and section 112 acquits an employed applicator of marks who meets four conditions. Together they decide what happens to the goods and to the person who merely did the work. If you face such a case, legal dispute resolution support is worth arranging early.

Section 110: no offence in certain cases

The provisions of sections 102, 103, 104 and 105 are, in relation to a registered trade mark or its proprietor, "subject to the rights created or recognised by this Act". No act or omission is deemed an offence under those sections if:

LimbCondition
(a)The alleged offence relates to a registered trade mark and the act or omission is permitted under this Act
(b)The alleged offence relates to a registered or an unregistered trade mark and the act or omission is permitted under any other law for the time being in force

Example. Kapoor Cycles, a registered proprietor, lets a licensee sell its goods in the manner the Act permits. A later complaint says the licensee applied the mark without authority. Where the use is one the Act permits, limb (a) says no offence under ss.102–105 is made out. The section speaks only of the offences under ss.102–105. For those offences, see sections 103–105.

Section 111: forfeiture of goods

Section 111(1) lets the court direct forfeiture to Government of all goods and things by means of, or in relation to, which the offence has been committed, or would have been committed but for the proof relied on. The court may do so where a person:

  1. is convicted of an offence under section 103, 104 or 105; or
  2. is acquitted of an offence under section 103 or 104 on proof that he acted without intent to defraud; or
  3. is acquitted under section 104 on proof of the matters in clause (a), (b) or (c) of that section.

Note the word "may": forfeiture is for the court to direct. The court that convicts or acquits makes the direction.

Appeals and destruction

Sub-sectionRule
111(2)When forfeiture is directed on a conviction and an appeal lies against the conviction, an appeal lies against the forfeiture also
111(3)When forfeiture is directed on an acquittal and the goods or things are of value exceeding fifty rupees, an appeal against the forfeiture may be preferred within thirty days from the date of the direction, to the court to which appeals ordinarily lie from sentences of the court that directed it
111(4)When forfeiture is directed on a conviction, the court may order the forfeited articles to be destroyed or otherwise disposed of as it thinks fit

The section does not say what the "otherwise disposed of" options are, nor does it give a procedure for release. Release of articles seized by police is addressed separately in section 115, where an interested person may apply within fifteen days of a seizure.

Section 112: exemption of certain persons employed in the ordinary course of business

A person accused of an offence under section 103 "shall be acquitted" if he proves all of the following:

ClauseWhat must be proved
(a)In the ordinary course of his business he is employed on behalf of other persons to apply trade marks or trade descriptions, or to make dies, blocks, machines, plates or other instruments for making, or being used in making, trade marks
(b)In the case charged he was so employed, and was not interested in the goods or thing by way of profit or commission dependent on the sale of such goods or providing of services
(c)Having taken all reasonable precautions against committing the offence, he had, at the time, no reason to suspect the genuineness of the trade mark or trade description
(d)On demand made by or on behalf of the prosecutor, he gave all the information in his power about the persons on whose behalf the mark or description was applied

These are cumulative: the word "and" joins (a) to (d). The burden is on the accused; the opening words are "proves".

Example. A printing press in a commercial lane prints cartons for a customer who supplies the artwork. The press owner is paid a flat job-work fee and has no share in the sale of the goods. He checked the customer's trade mark certificate before printing and, when the prosecutor asked, gave the customer's name and address. If those facts are proved, section 112 requires acquittal. If the press owner were paid a commission on each carton of product sold, clause (b) would not be met.

The section is confined to section 103. It does not on its terms cover sections 104 or 105, and it does not say what happens to the goods; forfeiture under section 111 is a separate step.

How the three sections fit

  • Section 110 asks whether an offence exists at all.
  • Section 112 asks whether a particular accused is to be acquitted.
  • Section 111 asks what becomes of the goods, even where the accused is acquitted on certain proofs.

Practical points

  1. Keep written instructions, artwork approvals and proof of trade-mark ownership for every job where you apply someone's mark.
  2. Do not take a share in the sale of the goods if you want to rely on section 112.
  3. Respond to a prosecutor's demand for information promptly; clause (d) depends on it.
  4. If goods are forfeited on acquittal, note the thirty-day appeal period and the fifty-rupee value threshold.

Need help with a dispute over seized or forfeited goods?

Forfeiture, release of goods and the employed-applicator defence all turn on the facts of each case and on short time limits. Our legal dispute resolution team can look at your papers and tell you which route the sections point to.

Key takeaways

  • Section 110: no offence under ss.102–105 where the act is permitted under this Act (registered marks) or any other law (registered or unregistered marks).
  • Section 111: forfeiture to Government is for the court; an appeal against forfeiture on acquittal lies within thirty days where value exceeds fifty rupees.
  • Section 112 applies to section 103 only and needs all four conditions to be proved.
  • The burden under section 112 is on the accused.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the Trade Marks Act, 1999 as amended by the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021 and the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2023, as consulted on 1 October 2026. Forms, fees and procedure are set by the Trade Marks Rules, 2017 as amended from time to time. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Sections 110

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Can goods be forfeited even if the accused is acquitted?

Yes, in the cases section 111(1) lists: acquittal under section 103 or 104 on proof of no intent to defraud, or under section 104 on proof of the matters in clauses (a) to (c).

Is forfeiture automatic on conviction?

No. The section says the court "may direct" forfeiture.

A penalty is the visible cost of a delay; the lost time and credibility are the larger part.

— TaxClue Compliance Desk

Sections 110: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,350 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

Yes, in the cases section 111(1) lists: acquittal under section 103 or 104 on proof of no intent to defraud, or under section 104 on proof of the matters in clauses (a) to (c).

No. The section says the court "may direct" forfeiture.

Thirty days from the date of the direction, where the goods are of value exceeding fifty rupees.

No. Clause (c) requires that he took all reasonable precautions and had no reason to suspect the genuineness of the mark.

By its terms it applies to an accused of an offence under section 103.

The accused. The text begins "Where a person accused ... proves".