Next due
20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 3 days 21 OCTTax Audit Report · Form 3CA/3CB · AY 2026-27 · extended from 30 Sepin 4 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 13 days 7 NOVTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Oct 2026in 21 days 11 NOVGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Oct 2026in 25 days 15 NOVPF & ESI · Contributions · Oct 2026in 29 days 21 NOVITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27 · extended from 31 Octin 35 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 43 days
All due dates

Ind AS 107 — Financial Instruments: Disclosures

Ind AS 107 prescribes disclosures enabling users to evaluate the significance of financial instruments and the nature and extent of risks — credit, liquidity and market — arising...

Published
Updated
Reading time
4 min
Views
18
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Medium Complexity
Topic
Accounting Standards & Bookkeeping
Published
August 26, 2026
Last updated
Aug 26, 2026
Reading time
4 min
0:00
Last updated: August 2026Verified against: Government sources

Overview

Ind AS 107, notified under the Companies (Ind AS) Rules, 2015, completes the financial-instruments trio: Ind AS 32 (presentation), Ind AS 109 (recognition and measurement) and Ind AS 107 (disclosure). It does not change measurement; it dictates what must be told to users so they can understand the instruments and the risks they create.

Scope

Ind AS 107 applies to all entities and to all types of financial instruments, with limited exceptions (such as interests in subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures accounted for under other standards, and employee-benefit and insurance arrangements). It applies to both recognised and unrecognised financial instruments.

Category One — Significance of Financial Instruments

These disclosures explain the impact of financial instruments on the statements:

  • carrying amounts of each category of financial asset and liability (measured at amortised cost, FVOCI, FVTPL);
  • net gains or losses by category, interest income and expense, and impairment losses;
  • fair values of each class, with the fair value hierarchy — Level 1 (quoted prices in active markets), Level 2 (other observable inputs) and Level 3 (unobservable inputs) — and reconciliations of Level 3 movements;
  • information about hedge accounting: the risk management strategy, the effect on amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows, and the effect on the statements.

Category Two — Nature and Extent of Risks

For each type of risk, both qualitative (exposures, how they arise, objectives and processes for managing them) and quantitative disclosures are required.

RiskKey quantitative disclosure
Credit riskMaximum exposure, credit quality, concentrations, expected-credit-loss allowance and its movements
Liquidity riskMaturity analysis of financial liabilities by remaining contractual maturity
Market riskSensitivity analysis for currency, interest-rate and other price risk

Credit Risk and Expected Credit Losses

Aligned with the Ind AS 109 expected credit loss (ECL) model, an entity discloses the maximum exposure to credit risk, the loss allowance, and how the gross carrying amounts and loss allowances have changed (including transfers between the 12-month and lifetime ECL stages). It also discloses collateral and other credit enhancements and any significant concentrations of credit risk.

Liquidity Risk

A maturity analysis of non-derivative (and derivative) financial liabilities is disclosed, showing the remaining contractual maturities based on undiscounted cash flows, together with a narrative of how the entity manages the resulting liquidity risk — for example through committed credit lines.

Market Risk — Sensitivity Analysis

For each type of market risk, the entity discloses a sensitivity analysis showing how profit or loss and equity would have been affected by reasonably possible changes in the relevant risk variable at the reporting date.

Worked Example

A company has US-dollar borrowings of USD 20,00,000, recorded at ₹16,60,00,000 (₹83/USD). It discloses that a reasonably possible 5% strengthening of the US dollar would increase the liability and reduce profit before tax by approximately ₹83,00,000, with an equal and opposite effect on a 5% weakening. This single, standardised disclosure lets users gauge the entity's foreign-currency exposure without access to internal models.

Key Point

Ind AS 107 disclosures are more extensive than the earlier Indian GAAP, which had limited requirements for financial-instrument risk disclosure. The risk narrative plus quantitative sensitivity and maturity analyses give users a structured view of the entity's exposure to and management of financial risk.

Related Guides

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Ind AS 107

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

What is the objective of Ind AS 107?

To require disclosures that enable users of financial statements to evaluate the significance of financial instruments for the entity's financial position and performance, and the nature and extent of risks arising from those instruments and how the entity manages them.

What are the two broad categories of disclosure?

First, the significance of financial instruments (balance-sheet and P&L disclosures by category, fair values, hedge accounting). Second, risk disclosures — qualitative and quantitative information about credit risk, liquidity risk and market risk.

The right form filed late and the wrong form filed on time cause the same trouble — file the right one on time.

— TaxClue Compliance Desk

Ind AS 107: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,350 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed:

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

To require disclosures that enable users of financial statements to evaluate the significance of financial instruments for the entity's financial position and performance, and the nature and extent of risks arising from those instruments and how the entity manages them.

First, the significance of financial instruments (balance-sheet and P&L disclosures by category, fair values, hedge accounting). Second, risk disclosures — qualitative and quantitative information about credit risk, liquidity risk and market risk.

A three-level hierarchy: Level 1 (quoted prices in active markets), Level 2 (inputs other than quoted prices that are observable), and Level 3 (unobservable inputs). Entities disclose fair values by level, and movements within Level 3.

The maximum exposure to credit risk, information about credit quality and concentrations, and, under the Ind AS 109 expected credit loss model, the loss allowance and the significant changes in gross carrying amounts contributing to changes in the allowance.

A maturity analysis of financial liabilities showing the remaining contractual maturities, and a description of how the entity manages the liquidity risk inherent in that maturity profile.

Yes. Entities must disclose a sensitivity analysis for each type of market risk (currency, interest rate, other price risk) showing how profit or loss and equity would have been affected by reasonably possible changes in the relevant risk variable.