Next due
7 OCTTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Sep 2026in 2 days 11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 6 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 10 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 15 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 25 days 31 OCTITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27in 26 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 55 days 15 DECAdvance Tax · 3rd (75%) instalment · FY 2026-27in 71 days
All due dates

Exchange Differences Under Ind AS 23 in NBFC Finance Costs

All exchange differences on foreign currency borrowings are a cost of borrowing whether capitalised or not — and the paragraph 6(e) limit governs capitalisation, not presentation.

Published
Updated
Reading time
5 min
Views
26
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Medium Complexity
Topic
Accounting Standards & Bookkeeping
Published
September 7, 2026
Last updated
Oct 2, 2026
Reading time
5 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

The starting position

Ind AS 21 and Ind AS 23 deal with foreign exchange differences arising on foreign currency transactions included in the financial statements of an entity. The same shall be disclosed under "Other interest expense" finance cost.

All exchange differences within the purview of Ind AS 21 are recognized as exchange differences and presented accordingly. However, all exchange differences arising from foreign currency borrowings are within the purview of Ind AS 23 and are regarded as a cost of borrowing irrespective of whether they are capitalized or not as a part of the cost of the asset.

Why exchange differences on borrowings are a borrowing cost

The reasoning is economic rather than formal. An entity that borrows in a foreign currency at a low coupon and an entity that borrows domestically at a high coupon may be paying the same all-in cost — the difference between the two coupons is roughly the market's expectation of currency movement.

If the coupon were presented as finance cost and the currency movement as an operating exchange loss, the two entities' finance costs would look quite different despite identical economics. Treating the exchange difference as a cost of borrowing keeps the comparison honest.

That is why the classification holds irrespective of whether they are capitalized or not — the character of the item does not change with its accounting destination.

The capitalisation calculation

In accordance with Ind AS 23 Borrowing Costs, borrowing costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset form part of the cost of that asset. For the purpose of capitalization, borrowing costs also include exchange difference regarded as an adjustment to borrowing costs. Exchange differences eligible for capitalization are determined in accordance with Paragraph 6(e) and 6A of Ind AS 23.

Accordingly, in case a company has utilized its foreign currency borrowings for the purpose of acquisition or construction of a qualifying asset, it would capitalize certain portion of foreign exchange differences in accordance with Paragraph 6(e) and 6A of Ind AS 23. All other borrowing costs are recognized as an expense.

The presentation question is separate

For presenting foreign exchange differences arising on foreign currency borrowings in the statement of profit and loss, there is no specific requirement to apply the limit prescribed in paragraphs 6(e) and 6A of Ind AS 23, since the nature of the exchange difference on foreign currency borrowings is effectively a cost of borrowing.

Accordingly, the entire foreign exchange differences relating to foreign currency borrowings, to the extent not capitalized in accordance with Ind AS 23, should be presented under the head "finance costs".

The two steps in order

StepQuestionGoverned by
1. CapitalisationHow much of the exchange difference forms part of the cost of a qualifying asset?Paragraphs 6(e) and 6A of Ind AS 23 — a computed limit
2. PresentationWhere does the remainder go?Finance costs, in full — the paragraph 6(e) limit does not apply again

The error the guidance forestalls is applying the paragraph 6(e) computation twice — once to determine what is capitalised, and again to split the residue between finance costs and other expenses. There is no such second split. Whatever is not capitalised is finance cost, entirely.

Exchange differences that are not borrowing costs

Differences arising on ordinary foreign currency transactions — trade payables, receivables, foreign currency balances — remain within Ind AS 21 and are presented as net gain or loss on foreign currency transaction and translation (other than those considered as finance cost) under other income, or as an expense where the net position is a loss.

The head's own wording carries the carve-out, which is how the two populations are kept apart on the face of the statement.

Common mistakes

  • Splitting uncapitalised exchange differences between finance costs and other expenses.
  • Presenting exchange differences on foreign currency borrowings as an operating item.
  • Capitalising exchange differences on borrowings not used for a qualifying asset.
  • Applying the paragraph 6(e) limit to the presentation decision.
Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Exchange Differences

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Which standards deal with exchange differences?

Ind AS 21 and Ind AS 23 deal with foreign exchange differences arising on foreign currency transactions included in the financial statements of an entity. The same shall be disclosed under other interest expense within finance costs.

How are exchange differences on borrowings regarded?

All exchange differences arising from foreign currency borrowings are within the purview of Ind AS 23 and are regarded as a cost of borrowing, irrespective of whether they are capitalized or not as part of the cost of the asset.

Books written up every week need no heroics at year end.

— TaxClue Accounts & Audit Desk

Exchange Differences: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,327 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

Ind AS 21 and Ind AS 23 deal with foreign exchange differences arising on foreign currency transactions included in the financial statements of an entity. The same shall be disclosed under other interest expense within finance costs.

All exchange differences arising from foreign currency borrowings are within the purview of Ind AS 23 and are regarded as a cost of borrowing, irrespective of whether they are capitalized or not as part of the cost of the asset.

Borrowing costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset form part of the cost of that asset. For the purpose of capitalization, borrowing costs also include exchange difference regarded as an adjustment to borrowing costs.

Exchange differences eligible for capitalization are determined in accordance with paragraph 6(e) and 6A of Ind AS 23.

No. For presenting foreign exchange differences arising on foreign currency borrowings in the statement of profit and loss, there is no specific requirement to apply the limit prescribed in paragraphs 6(e) and 6A of Ind AS 23, since the nature of the exchange difference on foreign currency borrowings is effectively a cost of borrowing.

The entire foreign exchange differences relating to foreign currency borrowings, to the extent not capitalized in accordance with Ind AS 23, should be presented under the head finance costs.