Next due
7 OCTTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Sep 2026due today 11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 4 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 8 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 13 days 21 OCTTax Audit Report · Form 3CA/3CB · AY 2026-27 · extended from 30 Sepin 14 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 23 days 21 NOVITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27 · extended from 31 Octin 45 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 53 days
All due dates

Sections 81-82 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882: Marshalling of Securities and Contribution to a Mortgage Debt

Section 81 (marshalling): if an owner mortgages two or more properties to one person and then mortgages one or more of them to another, the subsequent mortgagee may, unless the...

Published
Updated
Reading time
7 min
Views
5
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Medium Complexity
Topic
Property Law
Published
October 2, 2026
Last updated
Oct 7, 2026
Reading time
7 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Sections 81 and 82 deal with fairness among those whose property is tied up in the same mortgage. Section 81 lets a later mortgagee push an earlier debt on to properties that are not mortgaged to him. Section 82 makes co-owners, and the properties of one owner, share a debt rateably. This is explained as per the text of the Act consulted.

Source note

The text consulted is a publisher's print of the Act showing amendments up to the Transfer of Property (Amendment) Act, 2002 (3 of 2003); later amendments should be checked. Section 81 is printed inside square brackets, and the first paragraph of section 82 is too, which marks inserted or substituted wording. The group is headed "Marshalling and contribution" in the copy.

Printing slip. Section 81 reads "satisfied out of the property to properties not mortgaged to him". It reads as though "or" was meant between "property" and "properties". It is flagged and quoted as printed.

A related idea, marshalling by a purchaser, is in our article on sections 56 and 57. For help in reading such a priority question on your own property, a legal consultation before you lend or buy is a sensible step.

Section 81: marshalling securities

The setting. The owner of two or more properties mortgages them all to one person, and then mortgages one or more (not all) of them to another person.

The rule. The subsequent mortgagee is, in the absence of a contract to the contrary, entitled to have the prior mortgage-debt satisfied out of the property or properties not mortgaged to him, so far as they will extend.

The limit. This must not prejudice the rights of the prior mortgagee or of any other person who has for consideration acquired an interest in any of the properties.

Example. Gaurav owns a flat and a shop. He mortgages both to Bank A for a loan. Later he mortgages only the flat to Neha. Under section 81, Neha can ask that Bank A's debt be recovered from the shop, which is not mortgaged to her, as far as the shop will go. But Bank A's rights are not to be prejudiced, and neither are the rights of someone who bought an interest in the shop for consideration.

Section 82: contribution to the mortgage debt

Section 82 has three paragraphs.

Paragraph 1: separate owners. Where property subject to a mortgage belongs to two or more persons having distinct and separate rights of ownership, their shares or parts are, in the absence of a contract to the contrary, liable to contribute rateably to the debt secured by the mortgage. To fix each share's rate, its value is deemed to be its value at the date of the mortgage, after deducting the amount of any other mortgage or charge to which it was subject on that date.

Paragraph 2: two properties of one owner. Where, of two properties belonging to the same owner, one is mortgaged to secure one debt and then both are mortgaged to secure another, and the former debt is paid out of the former property, each property is, in the absence of a contract to the contrary, liable to contribute rateably to the latter debt, after deducting the amount of the former debt from the value of the property out of which it has been paid.

Paragraph 3: the link with section 81. Nothing in section 82 applies to a property liable under section 81 to the claim of the subsequent mortgagee. The word "subsequent" is in square brackets in the copy.

Side-by-side

FeatureSection 81 (marshalling)Section 82 (contribution)
Who benefitsThe subsequent mortgageeThose who bear the debt, by sharing it
What it doesPushes the prior debt to properties not mortgaged to himSpreads the debt rateably across shares or properties
Value measured atNot statedDate of the mortgage, after deducting other mortgages or charges
Contract can change itYes ("in the absence of a contract to the contrary")Yes
ProtectedPrior mortgagee; purchasers for considerationSection 81 claims take priority over this section

Worked example on contribution

Two sisters, Anjali and Bharti, own distinct plots that were mortgaged together for one loan of Rs. 6,00,000. At the date of the mortgage, Anjali's plot was worth Rs. 10,00,000 with no other burden; Bharti's was worth Rs. 8,00,000 but already carried another mortgage of Rs. 2,00,000. For section 82, Bharti's plot is valued at Rs. 6,00,000 (after deducting the other mortgage). So the two values are Rs. 10,00,000 and Rs. 6,00,000, and the debt is shared in that ratio of 10 to 6, unless a contract provides otherwise. These figures are our own illustration of the method; the Act prints no amounts.

Comparing with the purchaser's rule

Section 56, explained in the article on sections 56 and 57, gives a similar benefit to a purchaser of one of the properties. Section 81 gives it to a subsequent mortgagee. Reading both together shows who can ask for the other properties to be used first.

The idea of sharing a burden among several obligors also appears in a different law. See our article on joint promisors and contribution under the Indian Contract Act, 1872; the reader should check the current law for the corresponding provision of that Act.

Practical points

  • Later lenders: check how many properties the earlier mortgage covers; marshalling may help.
  • Owners: know how your plot is valued at the mortgage date for contribution, and what other charges it had then.
  • Draft the deed: both sections give way to a contract to the contrary.
  • Buyers: a purchaser who has paid for an interest in any of the properties is protected from marshalling under section 81.

Need help with multiple mortgages or co-owned security?

If several people own the mortgaged property, or several lenders hold security on the same assets, the order of recovery can turn on these two sections. Our legal consultation team can look at your documents and explain the position.

Key takeaways

  • Section 81 lets a subsequent mortgagee have the prior debt met from properties not mortgaged to him, as far as they extend.
  • It must not prejudice the prior mortgagee or a purchaser for consideration.
  • Section 82 makes separate owners' shares contribute rateably, valued at the mortgage date less other charges.
  • It also covers one owner's two properties where the second mortgage covers both.
  • Section 82 does not apply to property liable under section 81.
  • Both yield to a contract to the contrary.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on a publisher's print of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 showing amendments up to the Transfer of Property (Amendment) Act, 2002 (3 of 2003), as consulted on 2 October 2026. State amendments, later amendments, stamp duty and registration charges are not covered and should be checked. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Sections 81-82

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

What is marshalling in simple terms?

Section 81 lets a later lender require the earlier debt to be satisfied first from properties not mortgaged to him.

Does marshalling harm the first lender?

No. The section says it must not prejudice the prior mortgagee or any person who acquired an interest for consideration.

A clean record is built one small filing at a time, not in the week before an inspection.

— TaxClue Compliance Desk

Sections 81-82: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,350 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

Section 81 lets a later lender require the earlier debt to be satisfied first from properties not mortgaged to him.

No. The section says it must not prejudice the prior mortgagee or any person who acquired an interest for consideration.

By each share's value at the date of the mortgage after deducting the amount of any other mortgage or charge on it at that date.

Paragraph 2 of section 82 makes both properties contribute rateably to the second debt after the first debt is paid from the first property, with a deduction as the text states.

Yes. Both sections operate in the absence of a contract to the contrary.

No. The last paragraph says it does not apply to a property liable under section 81 to the claim of the subsequent mortgagee.