Next due
7 OCTTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Sep 2026tomorrow 11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 5 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 9 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 14 days 21 OCTTax Audit Report · Form 3CA/3CB · AY 2026-27 · extended from 30 Sepin 15 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 24 days 21 NOVITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27 · extended from 31 Octin 46 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 54 days
All due dates

Section 73 of the Industrial Relations Code, 2020: Compensation on Transfer of Ownership or Management

Where ownership or management of an establishment is transferred, by agreement or by operation of law, to a new employer, every worker with not less than one year of continuous...

Published
Updated
Reading time
7 min
Views
3
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • High Complexity
Topic
Labour Laws
Published
September 30, 2026
Last updated
Oct 6, 2026
Reading time
7 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

When the ownership or management of an establishment passes to a new employer, section 73 gives each worker with at least one year of continuous service the notice and compensation of section 70, as if he had been retrenched. The right falls away only if three protective conditions are all met. This matters in every sale, merger, slump sale or takeover of a business with staff.

The rule

Section 73 says: "Where the ownership or management of an establishment is transferred, whether by agreement or by operation of law, from the employer in relation to that establishment to a new employer, every worker who has been in continuous service for not less than one year in that establishment immediately before such transfer shall be entitled to notice and compensation in accordance with the provisions of section 70 as if the worker had been retrenched".

ElementText
TriggerTransfer of ownership or management of an establishment
Mode"by agreement or by operation of law"
Who benefitsEvery worker with not less than one year of continuous service in that establishment immediately before the transfer
What they getNotice and compensation under s.70 as if retrenched

Some points follow from the words.

  • Any mode of transfer. Sale, lease-type arrangements or a change by law all qualify if ownership or management passes to a new employer. The Code does not list transactions; the test is that ownership or management is transferred to a new employer.
  • Continuous service has the meaning in s.66, including deemed service (see sections 65 and 66). The one year is measured in "that establishment" and "immediately before such transfer".
  • Compensation "in accordance with s.70". Section 70 sets one month's notice (or pay in lieu), fifteen days' average pay per completed year (or part over six months) and the Government notice; see sections 68 to 70. The section does not say the worker's contract ends; it says the entitlement arises "as if the worker had been retrenched".
  • The section does not limit the right by establishment size; s.65's exclusions are stated for ss.67 to 69 only. Whether any other limit applies to a given case should be checked against the Code as a whole.

The proviso: no entitlement if three conditions are met

"Nothing in this section shall apply to a worker in any case where there has been a change of employers by reason of the transfer, if—

ConditionText
(a)"the service of the worker has not been interrupted by such transfer"
(b)"the terms and conditions of service applicable to the worker after such transfer are not in any way less favourable to the worker than those applicable to them immediately before the transfer"
(c)"the new employer is, under the terms of such transfer or otherwise, legally liable to pay to the worker, in the event of his retrenchment, compensation on the basis that his service has been continuous and has not been interrupted by the transfer"

All three must hold; the conditions are joined by "and" in the text. The words "in any way less favourable" set a demanding test on terms. Condition (c) needs the new employer to be legally liable, whether under the transfer agreement or otherwise, to pay compensation counting the old service. A promise that is not legally binding on the new employer does not meet it.

Example (invented). A company sells its plant as a going concern. Workers move to the buyer without a break (condition (a) met), on the same pay and leave (condition (b) met), and the sale agreement makes the buyer liable to pay retrenchment compensation counting service with the seller (condition (c) met). Section 73 does not apply and the seller owes no s.73 compensation. If the buyer offers a lower allowance structure, condition (b) fails and workers with one year of service are entitled to notice and compensation as if retrenched.

Practical steps in a business transfer

StepWhy
List workers with one year of continuous service at the transfer dateThey are the s.73 group
Compare post-transfer terms with pre-transfer terms line by lineCondition (b) says "in any way less favourable"
Put a clause in the transfer document making the buyer liable for compensation on the basis of continuous serviceCondition (c)
Confirm no gap in service on transferCondition (a)
If any condition cannot be met, compute s.70 compensation and serve noticeOtherwise liability arises

Deal documents often deal with employee liabilities in the warranties. Our labour law compliance team can help you map which workers are covered and how the clauses meet the three conditions. For tax on any compensation paid, see tax on retrenchment compensation, and for the old-law comparison on transfers and closure see Industrial Disputes Act 1947: retrenchment, closure and strike-lockout rules.

Rules, Forms and recovery

The Central Rules, 2026 (G.S.R. 342(E), 8 May 2026) contain rule 27 (Form XIII notice of retrenchment) and rule 37 (re-skilling fund) for retrenchment. The text of s.73 says only that the worker is entitled to notice and compensation "in accordance with the provisions of section 70"; whether rules 27 and 37 apply to a s.73 case is not stated in the rule text reviewed, so check it with the authority or your advisor. Unpaid compensation under Chapter IX can be recovered by the route in s.59 (see section 59). Where the State Government is the appropriate Government, State rules apply.

Need help with a business transfer?

Whether you are a seller, a buyer or a union, the three conditions should be tested before signing. Our labour law compliance team can help you review the workforce position and the transfer documents.

Key takeaways

  • A transfer of ownership or management, by agreement or operation of law, triggers notice and s.70 compensation for workers with one year of continuous service (s.73).
  • The entitlement is "as if the worker had been retrenched".
  • It does not apply if service is uninterrupted, new terms are not in any way less favourable, and the new employer is legally liable on the basis of continuous service.
  • All three conditions must be met.
  • Check each worker's service and terms line by line.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the Industrial Relations Code, 2020 (as enacted) and, where noted, the Industrial Relations (Central) Rules, 2026 (G.S.R. 342(E), 8 May 2026), as on 30 September 2026. The Code is in force from 21 November 2025; some provisions may be notified later, and State Governments make their own rules for establishments where the State is the appropriate Government. Verify the current position before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Section 73

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Does a sale of the business automatically end employment?

Section 73 does not say so; it gives an entitlement to notice and compensation as if retrenched, unless the proviso applies.

Who is covered?

Every worker with not less than one year of continuous service in the establishment immediately before the transfer.

The right form filed late and the wrong form filed on time cause the same trouble — file the right one on time.

— TaxClue Compliance Desk

Section 73: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,350 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

Section 73 does not say so; it gives an entitlement to notice and compensation as if retrenched, unless the proviso applies.

Every worker with not less than one year of continuous service in the establishment immediately before the transfer.

If service is not interrupted, new terms are not in any way less favourable, and the new employer is legally liable to pay compensation counting continuous service (proviso (a) to (c)).

Yes, "whether by agreement or by operation of law".

Notice and compensation in accordance with s.70.

Condition (c) requires the new employer to be legally liable under the terms of the transfer or otherwise.