Next due
11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 3 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 7 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 12 days 21 OCTTax Audit Report · Form 3CA/3CB · AY 2026-27 · extended from 30 Sepin 13 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 22 days 7 NOVTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Oct 2026in 30 days 21 NOVITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27 · extended from 31 Octin 44 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 52 days
All due dates

Sections 63-64 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882: Accession, Improvements and Renewed Lease on Redemption

If the mortgagee is in possession and the property receives an accession or an improvement, the mortgagor on redemption gets it, in the absence of a contract to the contrary. He...

Published
Updated
Reading time
7 min
Views
6
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Medium Complexity
Topic
Property Law
Published
October 2, 2026
Last updated
Oct 8, 2026
Reading time
7 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Sections 63, 63A and 64 answer a simple question: when a mortgaged property has grown, been improved or had its lease renewed while the lender held it, who gets the benefit when the mortgage is redeemed? The default answer favours the mortgagor, with a cost to pay in stated cases. This is explained below as per the text of the Act consulted.

Source and scope

The text consulted is a publisher's print of the Act showing amendments up to the Transfer of Property (Amendment) Act, 2002 (3 of 2003); later amendments should be checked. These three provisions come after the mortgagor's right to redeem, covered in our article on Section 60. The mirror-image rule for the lender's side, section 70 and section 71, is in our article on sections 70 to 73. If you are reading a mortgage-deed that touches these points, a legal consultation before signing is worth the time.

Section 63: accession to mortgaged property

The general rule. Where mortgaged property in possession of the mortgagee has, during the continuance of the mortgage, received any accession, the mortgagor, upon redemption, shall, in the absence of a contract to the contrary, be entitled as against the mortgagee to such accession. An accession is something added to the property; the section does not define it further.

Printing note: the copy shows a second marginal heading, "Accession acquired in virtue of transferred ownership", inside section 63. It is part of the same section, not a new one.

When the accession was bought by the mortgagee. The section then deals with an accession acquired at the mortgagee's expense:

  • If it can be separately possessed or enjoyed without harming the principal property, the mortgagor who wants it must pay the mortgagee the expense of acquiring it.
  • If separate possession or enjoyment is not possible, the accession must be delivered with the property. The mortgagor is then liable to pay the proper cost, as an addition to the principal money, where the acquisition was necessary to preserve the property from destruction, forfeiture or sale, or was made with his assent. Interest runs at the same rate as on the principal, or, where no such rate is fixed, at nine per cent per annum, as printed.
  • In that last case the profits arising from the accession are credited to the mortgagor.

Usufructuary mortgages. Where the mortgage is usufructuary and the accession was acquired at the mortgagee's expense, the profits from the accession are, in the absence of a contract to the contrary, set off against the interest (if any) payable on the money so spent.

Section 63A: improvements

Sub-section (1). Where mortgaged property in possession of the mortgagee has, during the mortgage, been improved, the mortgagor, upon redemption, is entitled to the improvement in the absence of a contract to the contrary, and is not liable to pay its cost, except in the cases in sub-section (2).

Sub-section (2). The mortgagor is liable to pay the proper cost, added to the principal money with interest at the rate on the principal (or nine per cent per annum where none is fixed), where the improvement was effected at the mortgagee's cost and:

  1. it was necessary to preserve the property from destruction or deterioration; or
  2. it was necessary to prevent the security from becoming insufficient; or
  3. it was made in compliance with the lawful order of any public servant or public authority.

Profits accruing from the improvement are credited to the mortgagor. All this holds "in the absence of a contract to the contrary".

Section 64: renewal of a mortgaged lease

Where the mortgaged property is a lease and the mortgagee obtains a renewal of the lease, the mortgagor, upon redemption, has the benefit of the new lease, in the absence of a contract by him to the contrary. The copy prints "[ *]" after the word lease, marking omitted words without saying what they were. For leases generally, see our article on section 105.

Side by side

ProvisionSubjectMortgagor's position on redemptionWhen he must pay
63, first paragraphAccession to property in the mortgagee's possessionEntitled to the accessionNot stated for this paragraph; see the next row
63, later paragraphsAccession bought at the mortgagee's expenseTakes it if separable and he pays the expense; otherwise it goes with the propertyCost added to principal where acquisition was needed to preserve the property, or made with his assent
63A(1)ImprovementEntitled to it and not liable for its costOnly in the cases in (2)
63A(2)Improvement needed to preserve, to keep the security sufficient, or ordered by a public authorityEntitledProper cost, added to principal with interest
64Renewal of a mortgaged lease by the mortgageeGets the benefit of the new leaseNot stated in the text

Practical illustration

Sunita mortgages a shop to Dhruv, who takes possession. During the mortgage a municipal order requires Dhruv to repair the front, and he does so at his own cost. On redemption, section 63A(2) makes the proper cost payable by Sunita, added to the principal with interest, and the shop's improved front goes back to her. If Dhruv had instead added a decorative front for his own taste, section 63A(1) would give the improvement to Sunita without cost, unless the deed says otherwise.

Drafting tip. All of these rules start with "in the absence of a contract to the contrary". A well-written mortgage-deed can fix who pays for improvements and how profits are treated. Mortgage drafting is covered in our guide on mortgage deed drafting.

Need help with a mortgage that involves possession?

When a lender is in possession and spends money on the property, or a leasehold is mortgaged, the rights on redemption turn on the deed. Speak to us through our legal consultation service and we can read the clauses with you.

Key takeaways

  • Accession and improvements in the mortgagee's possession go to the mortgagor on redemption, unless the contract says otherwise.
  • Cost is payable by the mortgagor only in the cases the Act lists, and is then added to the principal.
  • Where no rate is fixed, interest on that cost is nine per cent per annum as printed.
  • Profits from a covered accession or improvement are credited to the mortgagor.
  • A lease renewal obtained by the mortgagee benefits the mortgagor on redemption.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on a publisher's print of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 showing amendments up to the Transfer of Property (Amendment) Act, 2002 (3 of 2003), as consulted on 2 October 2026. State amendments, later amendments, stamp duty and registration charges are not covered and should be checked. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Sections 63-64

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Who gets an accession to mortgaged property?

Where the property is in the mortgagee's possession, the mortgagor on redemption, unless a contract provides otherwise.

Does the mortgagor always pay for improvements?

No. Section 63A(1) says he is not liable for the cost, except in the cases in sub-section (2).

A due date missed is rarely a matter of law — it is almost always a matter of calendar.

— TaxClue Compliance Desk

Sections 63-64: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,350 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

Where the property is in the mortgagee's possession, the mortgagor on redemption, unless a contract provides otherwise.

No. Section 63A(1) says he is not liable for the cost, except in the cases in sub-section (2).

The rate payable on the principal, or, where none is fixed, nine per cent per annum as printed in the text consulted.

In the case of a necessary or assented acquisition, they are credited to the mortgagor. In a usufructuary mortgage with an accession acquired at the mortgagee's expense, they are set off against interest on the money spent.

Section 64 gives the mortgagor the benefit of the new lease on redemption, unless he contracted to the contrary.

Yes. Each rule operates in the absence of a contract to the contrary.