Next due
7 OCTTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Sep 2026in 2 days 11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 6 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 10 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 15 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 25 days 31 OCTITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27in 26 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 55 days 15 DECAdvance Tax · 3rd (75%) instalment · FY 2026-27in 71 days
All due dates
PMLA Live

Sections 62-64 of the Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002: vexatious search, false information and cognizance

An authority or officer who, without reasons recorded in writing, searches a building or place, or detains, searches or arrests a person, is liable to imprisonment up to two years...

Published
Updated
Reading time
9 min
Views
4
Questions
7 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Medium Complexity
  • In-Depth Guide
Topic
PMLA
Published
October 2, 2026
Last updated
Oct 5, 2026
Reading time
9 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Three sections in Chapter X guard against misuse of the Act's powers and against non-cooperation with it. Section 62 punishes an authority or officer who searches, detains or arrests without reasons recorded in writing. Section 63 punishes false information that causes an arrest or search, and penalises refusal to answer, to sign a statement or to attend a summons. Section 64 requires the previous sanction of the Central Government before a court takes cognizance of the criminal offences in sections 62 and 63(1).

This article reads them as per the consolidated text of the Act consulted (amendments shown up to 1 August 2019). Later amendments and notifications should be checked. A person who thinks a search was carried out improperly, or who faces a penalty under section 63, can seek legal dispute resolution advice on the record.

Section 62: punishment for vexatious search

Any authority or officer exercising powers under the Act or any rules made under it, who, without reasons recorded in writing:

  • (a) searches or causes to be searched any building or place; or
  • (b) detains or searches or arrests any person,

shall for every such offence be liable on conviction to imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years or fine which may extend to fifty thousand rupees or both.

The elements are:

ElementAs printed
WhoAny authority or officer exercising powers under the Act or the rules
ActSearches a building or place, or detains, searches or arrests a person
ConditionWithout reasons recorded in writing
PenaltyImprisonment up to two years, or fine up to fifty thousand rupees, or both, on conviction
Count"For every such offence"

The offence turns on the absence of recorded reasons. The Act's search, search-of-persons and arrest provisions require reasons to be recorded in writing, as read in our article on section 19 for arrest; the text of section 62 itself only says that doing these acts without recorded reasons is punishable. It does not say what makes reasons adequate, and this article says nothing on that.

Section 63: false information and failure to give information

Sub-section (1): false information

The text is numbered "(I)" in the copy consulted; it is the first sub-section and is quoted as printed. Any person wilfully and maliciously giving false information and so causing an arrest or a search to be made under the Act shall on conviction be liable to imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine which may extend to fifty thousand rupees, or both.

Three conditions are joined: the information must be false, it must be given wilfully and maliciously, and it must cause an arrest or a search. A person who gives wrong information by honest mistake does not fit the words "wilfully and maliciously".

Sub-section (2): refusal and omission

If any person:

ClauseDefault
(a)Being legally bound to state the truth of any matter relating to an offence under section 3, refuses to answer any question put to him by an authority in the exercise of its powers under the Act
(b)Refuses to sign any statement made by him in the course of any proceedings under the Act, which an authority may legally require to sign (the text prints "which an authority may legally require to sign")
(c)To whom a summons is issued under section 50 either to attend to give evidence or produce books of account or other documents at a certain place and time, omits to attend or produce books of account or documents at the place or time (the text prints "a summon")

he shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum which shall not be less than five hundred rupees but which may extend to ten thousand rupees for each such default or failure. Unlike sub-section (1), this is a monetary penalty and not an imprisonment offence, and the range has a floor as well as a ceiling.

Section 50, the summons provision, is read in our article on section 50.

Sub-section (3): a hearing first

No order under this section shall be passed by an authority referred to in sub-section (2) unless the person on whom the penalty is proposed to be imposed is given an opportunity of being heard in the matter by such authority. The penalty order cannot be made without it.

Sub-section (4): intentional disobedience

Notwithstanding anything in clause (c) of sub-section (2), a person who intentionally disobeys any direction issued under section 50 shall also be liable to be proceeded against under section 174 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860). The footnote shows sub-section (4) inserted by Act 2 of 2013, s. 26 (w.e.f. 15-2-2013). The section of the Indian Penal Code is quoted as printed; check the current penal law for the corresponding provision.

Recovery of an unpaid penalty

Section 69 provides that where any fine or penalty imposed under section 13 or section 63 is not paid within six months from the day of imposition, the Director or an officer authorised by him may proceed to recover it. The mechanics are in our article on sections 65, 67 to 69 and 71.

Section 64: cognizance of offences

Sub-section (1)

No court shall take cognizance of any offence under section 62 or sub-section (1) of section 63 except with the previous sanction of the Central Government. Note what is covered: the offences in section 62 and in section 63(1). The penalty in section 63(2) is imposed by an authority after a hearing and is not a matter of court cognizance. Whether sub-section (4) of section 63 is covered by the sanction requirement is not stated; the section names only section 62 and sub-section (1) of section 63.

Sub-section (2): ninety days

The Central Government shall, by an order, either give sanction or refuse to give sanction within ninety days of the receipt of the request in this behalf. The sub-section requires an order in either case. The text does not say what follows if no order is made within ninety days, and this article does not supply an answer.

The three sections side by side

Section 62Section 63(1)Section 63(2)
WhoAuthority or officerAny personAny person bound to answer, sign or attend
WhatSearch, detention or arrest without recorded reasonsWilful and malicious false information causing arrest or searchRefusal to answer or sign, omission to attend or produce
ConsequenceImprisonment up to two years or fine up to fifty thousand rupees or both, on convictionSamePenalty of not less than five hundred rupees up to ten thousand rupees per default
Court cognizancePrevious sanction (s.64)Previous sanction (s.64)Not applicable: penalty by an authority after a hearing

A worked example

Mr Sanjay Rao (invented) is summoned under section 50 to bring his company's books to an office on a fixed date and time, and sends only a letter. Under section 63(2)(c) a penalty may be proposed for the omission, but only after he is given an opportunity of being heard (sub-section (3)). If the penalty is imposed within the range printed, the floor is five hundred rupees and the ceiling ten thousand rupees for each default.

In another case, a rival trader (invented) gives an officer false information, wilfully and maliciously, that goods are being held for laundering, and a search follows. Section 63(1) applies; the court cannot take cognizance without the previous sanction of the Central Government (section 64(1)). The Central Government must give or refuse sanction by order within ninety days of receiving the request (section 64(2)).

Need help with a penalty or an improper search?

If you have been asked to answer questions, sign a statement or attend, or you believe a search was made without recorded reasons, the written record is the starting point. Our team assists through legal dispute resolution, working from the notice and the records you hold.

Key takeaways

  • Section 62 punishes an authority or officer who searches, detains or arrests without reasons recorded in writing: up to two years or fine up to fifty thousand rupees or both, on conviction.
  • Section 63(1) punishes wilful and malicious false information causing an arrest or a search, with the same maximum penalties.
  • Section 63(2) imposes a penalty of not less than five hundred rupees up to ten thousand rupees for each default of refusing to answer, refusing to sign or failing to attend or produce.
  • No penalty order under section 63 can be passed without an opportunity of being heard.
  • Section 63(4) refers intentional disobedience of a section 50 direction to a section of the Indian Penal Code, as printed.
  • Courts take cognizance of section 62 and section 63(1) offences only with the previous sanction of the Central Government, to be given or refused within ninety days.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the consolidated text of the Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002 published by the Enforcement Directorate, showing amendments up to Act 23 of 2019 (1 August 2019), and on the Department of Revenue consolidated copy of the Prevention of Money-laundering (Maintenance of Records) Rules, 2005 listing amendments up to 19 July 2024, as consulted on 2 October 2026. Later amendments, notifications, other rules and regulator directions should be checked. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Sections 62-64

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

What is vexatious search under PMLA?

Under section 62, it is a search, detention or arrest by an authority or officer exercising powers under the Act without reasons recorded in writing.

What is the punishment for it?

On conviction, imprisonment up to two years or fine up to fifty thousand rupees or both, for every such offence.

Choose the forum and the governing law while both sides are still agreeable.

— TaxClue Legal Desk

Sections 62-64: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,327 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 7 questions readers ask most on this topic.

Under section 62, it is a search, detention or arrest by an authority or officer exercising powers under the Act without reasons recorded in writing.

On conviction, imprisonment up to two years or fine up to fifty thousand rupees or both, for every such offence.

Section 63(2)(c): a penalty of not less than five hundred rupees but up to ten thousand rupees for each default, imposed only after a hearing.

Yes, if it is given wilfully and maliciously and so causes an arrest or search: imprisonment up to two years or fine up to fifty thousand rupees or both, on conviction.

Section 64(1) says no court shall take cognizance of an offence under section 62 or section 63(1) except with the previous sanction of the Central Government.

Ninety days from receipt of the request, by an order either giving or refusing sanction.

Section 69 allows recovery of an unpaid section 63 penalty after six months.