Next dueCompany / ROC
14 OCTADT-1 · Auditor appointment (after AGM)in 12 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 28 days 31 OCTITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27in 29 days 31 OCTMSME-1 · Dues to MSMEs · Apr–Sep 2026in 29 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 58 days 30 JUNDPT-3 · Return of deposits · FY 2026-27in 271 days 7 OCTTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Sep 2026in 5 days 11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 9 days
All due dates

Section 462 and the Private Company Exemption Notification

Every private company exemption comes from one notification under Section 462 - and one late annual filing removes all of them at once. How the power works and why it...

Published
Updated
Reading time
5 min
Views
21
Questions
5 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • High Complexity
Topic
Company Law
Published
September 5, 2026
Last updated
Oct 2, 2026
Reading time
5 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Almost every relaxation a private company enjoys comes from one source: a notification issued by the Central Government under Section 462.

Understanding how that power works explains three things people find confusing — why the exemptions are conditional, why they can vanish, and why they're read so strictly.

What Section 462 actually empowers

The Central Government may, in the public interest, by notification, direct that any provision of the Act:

(a) shall not apply to a class of companies; or (b) shall apply with such exceptions, modifications and adaptations as the notification specifies.

Two different limbs, and the difference matters when you read the notification.

Limb (a) switches a section off. Sections 43, 47, 62(1)(a)(i)–(2), 67, 101–107, 109, 160, 162 and 180 are switched off for private companies this way.

Limb (b) leaves it on but rewritten. Sections 141(3)(g), 173(5), 174(3), 177, 184(2), 185, 188 and 196(4)–(5) are modified this way.

"Shall not apply" means ignore the section. "Shall apply with the modification that…" means the section still governs you — in its modified form. Don't read the second as the first.

It isn't a purely executive act

A draft of every Section 462 notification must be laid before each House of Parliament for thirty days while in session. If both Houses agree it shouldn't be issued, or should be issued only in modified form, that's what happens. And every issued notification is laid before Parliament too.

That's why exemptions arrive in batches rather than piecemeal — and why they don't change often.

The two notifications

5 June 2015 (G.S.R. 464(E)) — the original set. Sections 43, 47, 62, 67, 101–107, 109, 141(3)(g), 160, 162, 180, 184(2), 185, 188 and 196(4)–(5).

13 June 2017 (G.S.R. 583(E)) — a substantial expansion. It added:

  • the Section 173(5) two-meeting relaxation for OPCs, small companies and dormant companies;
  • the Section 174(3) interested-director quorum modification;
  • an expanded Section 73(2) deposits relief covering start-ups and the no-associate/subsidiary category; and, critically,
  • the filing-compliance condition.

Other classes — Government companies, Section 8 companies, Nidhi companies, specified IFSC companies — each have their own Section 462 notification.

The one sentence that governs everything

The 2017 notification inserted this into the 2015 one:

The exceptions, modifications and adaptations… shall be applicable to a private company which has not committed a default in filing its financial statements under section 137 or annual return under section 92 with the Registrar.

That's the most consequential sentence in the whole exemption regime. Four consequences:

The exemptions aren't permanent. They exist only while you're current on AOC-4 and MGT-7/7A.

It's all-or-nothing. One late filing removes the entire set — not the one you happened to be using.

It's tested at the moment of the transaction. A Board resolution borrowing beyond the Section 180(1)(c) limit, passed while an AOC-4 was overdue, was passed without the exemption. Section 180(5) then leaves that debt open to challenge. Section 180 →

Curing the default restores the exemptions prospectively only. It does not retrospectively validate what you did while in default.

So the operational rule is simple. Before relying on any exemption for a material transaction — a large borrowing, a loan to a director, a related-party resolution carried by the related party's own votes — check the MCA master data for your filing status. It takes two minutes, and it's the only thing between a valid corporate act and a defective one.

Why they're read strictly

Exemption provisions are construed strictly against whoever claims them. Two examples from this notification make the point.

Section 185. The exemption requires that "no other body corporate has invested any money in its share capital". Not "holds less than 10%". Not "controls". Any investment by any body corporate — including an LLP, which is a body corporate — defeats it entirely. A single share is enough. Section 185 →

Sections 101–107. These give way "if the articles of the company otherwise provide". If your articles are silent — as they are where you adopted Table F unmodified — the sections apply in full. The exemption isn't self-executing. You had to actually write something different into your articles.

Who can't claim them at all

  • A private company that is a subsidiary of a public company — deemed public under the proviso to Section 2(71), so not a private company for the notification's purposes. How that happens →
  • A private company in default of Section 92 or 137.
  • A private company for a transaction that doesn't meet the specific conditions attached to that particular exemption — Sections 67, 73(2) and 185 each carry their own condition sets.

Key takeaways

  • Treat annual filings as the price of the exemptions. They aren't housekeeping.
  • Check filing status before any material act that relies on an exemption.
  • Read the notification, not a summary, when a transaction turns on one.
  • Don't assume your articles help. Where an exemption works only "if the articles otherwise provide", check what yours actually say.
  • Watch group structure changes. Becoming a subsidiary of a public company removes the whole notification, silently and immediately.

Read next

Disclaimer: Positions stated as on 4 September 2026. Section 462 notifications are amended from time to time — read the current text before relying on any exemption.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Section 462

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Where do private company exemptions come from?

A notification issued by the Central Government under Section 462 — principally the notifications of 5 June 2015 and 13 June 2017.

Can we lose the exemptions?

Yes. They apply only while the company hasn't defaulted in filing under Section 92 or Section 137. One late filing removes all of them.

Annual filings look routine until the year one is missed and every later one is blocked behind it.

— TaxClue Corporate Law Desk

Section 462: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
11,561 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 5 questions readers ask most on this topic.

A notification issued by the Central Government under Section 462 — principally the notifications of 5 June 2015 and 13 June 2017.

Yes. They apply only while the company hasn't defaulted in filing under Section 92 or Section 137. One late filing removes all of them.

No. Curing the default restores the exemptions prospectively. It doesn't validate what was done during the default period.

For the Section 185 exemption, decisively. An LLP is a body corporate, and any investment by any body corporate defeats that exemption.

No. Such a company is deemed public and is outside the notification entirely.