Next due
7 OCTTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Sep 2026in 4 days 11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 8 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 12 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 17 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 27 days 31 OCTITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27in 28 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 57 days 15 DECAdvance Tax · 3rd (75%) instalment · FY 2026-27in 73 days
All due dates

Section 41 of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009: Penalty for giving false information or false return

Section 41(1): giving information the officer asks for in the course of duty, which you know or have reason to believe is false: fine up to Rs 5,000; second or subsequent offence...

Published
Updated
Reading time
8 min
Views
7
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Medium Complexity
  • In-Depth Guide
Topic
Legal Metrology
Published
September 30, 2026
Last updated
Oct 3, 2026
Reading time
8 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Section 41 has two limbs. Sub-section (1) punishes giving false information to the Director, the Controller or a legal metrology officer. Sub-section (2) punishes a false return, record or register. It is the only section in this stretch of Chapter V that the Jan Vishwas Act, 2023 touched indirectly, by adding it to the compounding provisions in section 48. The Jan Vishwas Act, 2026 rewrites its penalties, once notified.

Sub-section (1): false information

The text: "Whoever gives any information to the Director, the Controller or any legal metrology officer, which he may require or ask for in the course of his duty, and which such person either knows or has reason to believe to be false".

  • Who is protected: the Director, the Controller and any legal metrology officer.
  • What triggers it: information the officer "may require or ask for in the course of his duty". It is tied to the officer's duty, not to any casual conversation.
  • Mental element: the person knows, or has reason to believe, the information is false. An honest mistake does not fit the words. "Has reason to believe" is wider than actual knowledge and reaches someone who had obvious grounds for doubt.
  • Penalty: fine up to Rs 5,000; for a second or subsequent offence, imprisonment up to six months and also fine.

Sub-section (2): false return, record or register

The text: "Whoever, being required by or under this Act so to do, submits a return or maintains any record or register which is false in material particulars".

  • The duty must be one "required by or under this Act". The Act's own record-keeping duty is in section 17, which lets State rules prescribe the registers and records (section 53(2)(b)). The registers themselves are in State rules; the sources we use do not reproduce them.
  • The test is "false in material particulars", not any error. A trivial slip is not the target; a false entry that matters is. The Act does not define "material".
  • Sub-section (2) has no knowledge requirement in its words, unlike sub-section (1). Whether intent or knowledge must still be shown is for the court; do not assume either way.
  • Penalty: fine up to Rs 5,000; for a second or subsequent offence, imprisonment up to one year and also fine.

If an officer has cited section 41 against your registers, legal dispute resolution advice before you reply is worth having.

The three layers

LayerSection 41(1)Section 41(2)
1. As enacted in 2010Fine up to Rs 5,000; second or subsequent: imprisonment up to 6 months and also fineFine up to Rs 5,000; second or subsequent: imprisonment up to 1 year and also fine
2. Jan Vishwas Act, 2023 (in force; item 40(H))Penalty wording not amended. Section 41 is added to the compounding provisions, section 48(1), (2) and (3)Same
3. Jan Vishwas Act, 2026 (Act 8 of 2026; in force only from the date the Central Government notifies; item 66(S))"Shall be warned with an improvement notice"; second offence: liable to penalty up to Rs 5,000; subsequent offences: fine not less than Rs 2 lakh but up to Rs 5 lakhSame wording as sub-section (1)

Source note. The 2026 text as printed takes the penalty from a figure of Rs 5,000 for the second offence to a floor of Rs 2 lakh for subsequent offences, in both sub-sections. That jump is what the printed text says; it is not an evident misprint, so we report it as written. Check the gazette and the notification before relying on it.

Two more 2026 points. First, the improvement notice under the new section 15(6) must state the grounds, the matters constituting the failure, the measures required and a reasonable period. Second, the new section 15(7) speaks of suspension or revocation of "registration or approval" if the notice is not complied with, after a hearing and with written reasons. How that would operate for a person without any registration is not stated in the amending text.

Compounding

Before 2023, section 41 was not on the compounding list, so an offender had to face trial. Item 40(H) of the 2023 Act inserted "section 41" in section 48(1) and (2) and, in section 48(3), after "sections 33 to 37,". Result:

WhoCan compound section 41?
Director, or officer specially authorised by him (section 48(2))Yes
Controller, or officer specially authorised by him (section 48(3))Yes

The compounding sum cannot exceed the maximum fine for the offence (proviso to section 48(3)). The rule 32A table in the Packaged Commodities Rules (as amended up to March 2022) does not list section 41, so the sum comes from whatever rules are in force. See compounding of offences and our article on section 48. Under the 2026 text the compounding section is replaced; check it once notified.

Section 50(1)(a) and (b) already listed section 41 when the Act was enacted, so decisions under it by a central officer can be appealed to the Director, and from the Director to the Central Government or an authorised officer. The State-side clauses (d) and (e) do not list section 41. See section 50.

Where false information typically arises

SituationLimb
Answering an officer's questions about the source of packages or the manufacturer's name, knowing the answer is untrue41(1)
Backdating or inventing entries in the register of weights and measures or sales41(2)
Filing a return required by the rules with figures you know to be wrong41(2)
An accidental arithmetic slip corrected on discoveryNot material on its face, but depends on the facts

Example 1. During an inspection, a wholesaler says that a consignment of packages came from a named manufacturer, when he knows it came from elsewhere. Section 41(1) is engaged. A first offence carries a fine up to Rs 5,000 under the 2010 text; a later one can carry imprisonment up to six months and also fine.

Example 2. A dealer's required stock register shows a verification that never took place. That is a false record "in material particulars", so section 41(2) is engaged, and compounding is open after the 2023 amendment.

Need help with a notice under section 41?

If an officer has alleged false statements or false registers, compare the register entries with the underlying records before any reply goes out. Our legal dispute resolution team can help organise that and consider compounding. Bring the notice, the registers concerned and supporting bills.

Key takeaways

  • Section 41(1) covers false information given to the Director, Controller or a legal metrology officer; 41(2) covers false returns, records and registers.
  • Fine up to Rs 5,000 for the first offence; repeat offences can attract imprisonment (six months for sub-section (1), one year for sub-section (2)) and also fine.
  • The 2023 Act added section 41 to the compounding provisions; it did not change the penalty.
  • The 2026 Act, only when notified, replaces the first-offence fine with an improvement notice and sets a floor of Rs 2 lakh for subsequent offences, as printed.
  • Keep accurate registers; the register formats come from State rules.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 (Act 1 of 2010) as enacted, read with the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2023 (in force; it amends section 48 to add section 41) and the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2026 (in force only from the date the Central Government notifies), and the Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011 (as amended up to March 2022), as on 30 September 2026. State Legal Metrology rules, later amendments and notifications change; verify the current position before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Section 41

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Is an honest mistake punishable under section 41(1)?

The sub-section requires that the person knows or has reason to believe the information is false.

What does "material particulars" mean?

The Act does not define it. The entry must be false in a way that matters; trivial errors are not the focus.

A supplier's licence is part of your own compliance — ask for a copy and check its validity.

— TaxClue Product Compliance Desk

Section 41: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
12,191 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

The sub-section requires that the person knows or has reason to believe the information is false.

The Act does not define it. The entry must be false in a way that matters; trivial errors are not the focus.

Yes, since the 2023 Act, by the Director or the Controller.

No. It only added section 41 to the compounding provisions.

Once notified: an improvement notice for the first offence, a penalty up to Rs 5,000 for the second, and fines of Rs 2 lakh to Rs 5 lakh after that, as printed.

Section 17 and the State rules made under section 53(2)(b) prescribe them; see the State rules.