Next due
11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 2 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 6 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 11 days 21 OCTTax Audit Report · Form 3CA/3CB · AY 2026-27 · extended from 30 Sepin 12 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 21 days 7 NOVTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Oct 2026in 29 days 21 NOVITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27 · extended from 31 Octin 43 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 51 days
All due dates

Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002: abuse of dominant position and predatory pricing

As per the consolidated text of the Act published by the Competition Commission of India (amendments shown up to the Finance Act, 2017), read with the Competition (Amendment) Act...

Published
Updated
Reading time
8 min
Views
9
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Medium Complexity
  • In-Depth Guide
Topic
Competition Law
Published
October 2, 2026
Last updated
Oct 8, 2026
Reading time
8 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 prohibits an enterprise or group from abusing its dominant position. Sub-section (2) lists five kinds of abuse, and the Explanation defines "dominant position", "predatory price" and "group". The 2023 amendment makes one change, to the Explanation under clause (a) of sub-section (2).

Section 4(1): the rule

Section 4(1) reads: "No enterprise or group shall abuse its dominant position." The words "or group" were added to this sub-section by the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007, and the 2023 Act does not touch sub-section (1). The prohibition is aimed at the abuse. It does not prohibit a firm from being large, successful or the only supplier of something, so long as it does not behave in the ways listed.

Section 4(2): when there is an abuse

Section 4(2) says there is an abuse of dominant position under sub-section (1) if an enterprise or a group does any of the following. (The consolidated text prints the opening words with a stray dash after the closing bracket; we have kept the meaning as printed.)

  • (a) directly or indirectly imposes unfair or discriminatory (i) condition in purchase or sale of goods or service, or (ii) price in purchase or sale (including predatory price) of goods or service;
  • (b) limits or restricts (i) production of goods or provision of services or market therefor, or (ii) technical or scientific development relating to goods or services to the prejudice of consumers;
  • (c) indulges in practice or practices resulting in denial of market access in any manner;
  • (d) makes conclusion of contracts subject to acceptance by other parties of supplementary obligations which, by their nature or according to commercial usage, have no connection with the subject of such contracts; or
  • (e) uses its dominant position in one relevant market to enter into, or protect, other relevant market.

Example. Narmada Power Components Ltd is the main supplier of a specialised part to assemblers in a region. It tells buyers that they will get the part only if they also buy an unrelated consumable from it (clause (d)), and it refuses to supply a new entrant that wants to start assembling (clause (c)). Both fit the printed words, if Narmada is dominant in the relevant market. The question of dominance comes first and is analysed through the factors in Section 19(4), explained in our article on the factors for adverse effect, dominance and relevant market.

If you are reviewing supply terms with a large customer base, our legal dispute resolution team can look at whether your market position and terms invite a complaint.

The Explanation to clause (a) and the 2023 change

The Explanation under clause (a) says that the unfair or discriminatory condition or price "shall not include such discriminatory condition or price which may be adopted to meet the competition". The 2023 Act (its Section 5) says: "for the words 'discriminatory condition or price', the words 'condition or price' shall be substituted." The words occur once in that Explanation, so after the amendment it reads: "...shall not include such condition or price which may be adopted to meet the competition".

PointBefore (consolidated text)After (2023 Act)
Exception for meeting competition"such discriminatory condition or price which may be adopted to meet the competition""such condition or price which may be adopted to meet the competition"
Clause (a) itself, "unfair or discriminatory"As printedNot changed
Sub-sections (1) and (2)(b) to (e)As printedNot changed

We read the amendment as removing the word "discriminatory" from the exception only, since the amending clause names no other place. The words "unfair or discriminatory" in clause (a)(i) and (ii) are not mentioned in the 2023 Act and remain.

Explanation (a): dominant position

"Dominant position" means "a position of strength, enjoyed by an enterprise, in the relevant market, in India, which enables it to— (i) operate independently of competitive forces prevailing in the relevant market; or (ii) affect its competitors or consumers or the relevant market in its favour." The words "relevant market" are defined in Section 2; see our article on relevant market, which also sets out the demand-side and supply-side tests added in 2023.

Explanation (b): predatory price

"Predatory price" means "the sale of goods or provision of services, at a. price which is below the cost, as may be determined by regulations, of production of the goods or provision of services, with a view to reduce competition or eliminate the competitors." The consolidated text prints a full stop after the word "a" ("at a. price"); we flag the slip and read it as "at a price". The cost is to be "determined by regulations". No regulations on cost are among the sources we consulted, so we state no cost test.

Explanation (c): group

The consolidated text inserts, by the 2007 amendment, a clause (c): "'group' shall have the same meaning as assigned to it in clause (b) of the Explanation to section 5." That Explanation was itself substituted in 2023, so the meaning of "group" in Section 4 is now the meaning in the substituted clause; see our article on the Explanation to Section 5. The 2023 Act does not change the text of Section 4's clause (c).

How abuse of dominance fits with the rest of the Act

An inquiry into an alleged abuse starts under Section 19 on information or a reference, and the Commission's orders and penalty powers are in Sections 27 and 28; the power to order the division of an enterprise enjoying a dominant position is in Section 28 and is covered in our article on the division of a dominant enterprise. A short introduction to the topic is in the guide on abuse of dominant position under Section 4, and practical habits for a business that holds a strong market position are in our post on competition compliance for businesses.

Need help with a dominance question?

If you supply an important input, run a large platform of customers or are on the receiving end of exclusive or bundled terms, our team can read your arrangements against Section 4. Start with a legal dispute resolution discussion and bring the contracts and the correspondence in question.

Key takeaways

  • Section 4 prohibits abuse of a dominant position by an enterprise or a group, not dominance itself.
  • Five kinds of abuse are listed in Section 4(2)(a) to (e).
  • "Dominant position" is a position of strength in the relevant market, in India.
  • The 2023 Act drops the word "discriminatory" from the meet-the-competition exception in the Explanation to clause (a).
  • The cost test for predatory price is "as may be determined by regulations", and no such regulation is in the sources consulted.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the consolidated text of the Competition Act, 2002 published by the Competition Commission of India (amendments shown up to the Finance Act, 2017), read with the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2023 as published in the Gazette of India on 11 April 2023, and on the regulations and guidelines of the Commission as notified in 2024, as consulted on 2 October 2026. Commencement notifications, notified thresholds, rules and later amendments should be checked. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Section 4

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Is it illegal to have a dominant position?

No. Section 4(1) prohibits abusing a dominant position. The five kinds of abuse are in Section 4(2).

What is a predatory price?

Under Explanation (b), it is the sale of goods or provision of services at a price below the cost, as may be determined by regulations, with a view to reduce competition or eliminate the competitors.

Ask the question before you sign — it is always cheaper than asking it afterwards.

— TaxClue Compliance Desk

Section 4: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,350 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

No. Section 4(1) prohibits abusing a dominant position. The five kinds of abuse are in Section 4(2).

Under Explanation (b), it is the sale of goods or provision of services at a price below the cost, as may be determined by regulations, with a view to reduce competition or eliminate the competitors.

It substituted the words "condition or price" for "discriminatory condition or price" in the Explanation to clause (a) of sub-section (2).

The Explanation to clause (a) says the unfair or discriminatory condition or price does not include a condition or price which may be adopted to meet the competition. How far that goes on the facts needs advice.

Yes. Sub-section (1) says "enterprise or group", and Explanation (c) takes the meaning of "group" from the Explanation to Section 5.

Section 28 deals with division of an enterprise enjoying a dominant position; see our article on that section.