Next due
7 OCTTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Sep 2026in 2 days 11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 6 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 10 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 15 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 25 days 31 OCTITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27in 26 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 55 days 15 DECAdvance Tax · 3rd (75%) instalment · FY 2026-27in 71 days
All due dates

Section 32 of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009: Penalty for failure to get a model approved

Whoever fails or omits to submit the model of any weight or measure for approval commits an offence under section 32. As enacted (and unchanged by the 2023 Act): a fine up to Rs...

Published
Updated
Reading time
7 min
Views
8
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Medium Complexity
Topic
Legal Metrology
Published
September 30, 2026
Last updated
Oct 4, 2026
Reading time
7 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Section 32 is the penalty behind section 22. It punishes whoever fails or omits to submit the model of a weight or measure for approval. It is not amended by the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2023, but the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2026 would change it sharply: a warning by improvement notice first, then a penalty of up to Rs 5 lakh, then a fine of Rs 10 lakh to Rs 20 lakh. That amendment is enacted but applies only from the date the Central Government notifies.

What section 32 punishes

The text is one sentence: "Whoever fails or omits to submit model of any weight or measure for approval, shall be punished...". Its content comes from section 22, which requires every person, before manufacturing or importing any weight or measure, to seek approval of the model.

Reading the two together:

PointExplanation
WhoAny person who had to seek approval: a manufacturer or importer of a weight or measure
The defaultNot submitting the model for approval ("fails or omits to submit")
Not the same as rejectionSection 32 is triggered by failure to submit, not by approval being refused
Exempt itemsSection 22's first proviso says approval "may not be required" for listed items such as cast iron, brass, bullion or carat weights and beam scales; a person who falls within it is not failing to submit something required
Foreign-approved modelsUnder section 22's second proviso, the prescribed authority may approve a model approved abroad without test or after a test; the importer still has to put the model before the authority

If your product might fall in a doubtful category, it is worth settling it before the first batch or shipment rather than after a notice. A legal consultation can help you map the product against section 22 and the prescribed rules.

Note what section 32 does not do. It does not punish a person for using an unapproved instrument; that depends on other sections, such as section 33 for unverified instruments and section 27 for non-conforming ones. It does not say whether manufacture and sale of an unapproved model can be prosecuted as separate offences; those are questions for the facts and the rules.

The penalty, layer by layer

LayerPenalty
1. As enacted in 2010Fine up to Rs 20,000; for the second or subsequent offence, imprisonment up to one year and also fine
2. After the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2023 (in force)No change. The 2023 Act's item for the Legal Metrology Act amends sections 25, 27, 28, 29, 31, 34, 35 and 48, not 32
3. Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2026 (Act 8 of 2026; in force only from the date the Central Government notifies; check the notification)"Shall be warned with an improvement notice"; for the second offence "liable to penalty which may extend to five lakh rupees"; for subsequent offences "the fine shall not be less than ten lakh rupees but may extend to twenty lakh rupees"

The 2026 step is the largest jump in this group of sections: from a maximum of Rs 20,000 (plus the imprisonment possibility) to a penalty of up to Rs 5 lakh and a fine of Rs 10 lakh to Rs 20 lakh. The 2026 text does not retain the imprisonment limb for section 32. All of this stays on paper until notification.

The improvement notice

The 2026 Act's new section 15(6) lets a Director, Controller or legal metrology officer, who has reasonable ground to believe that a person has failed to comply, serve an improvement notice stating the grounds and the non-compliance, the measures to be taken and a reasonable period for them. The new section 15(7) provides for suspension or revocation of registration or approval if the person does not comply, with an opportunity of being heard before the authorised officer acts. For a model-approval default, the practical first step would therefore be to submit the model within the period the notice gives. See our article on section 15.

Compounding: Director only

Section 48(1) covers offences under sections 27 to 39, which includes section 32. However, who may compound differs:

  • The Director, or an officer specially authorised by him, may compound offences under sections 25 and 27 to 39 (section 48(2)), which includes section 32.
  • The Controller, or an officer specially authorised, may compound only sections 25, 27 to 31, 33 to 37 and 45 to 47 (section 48(3)). Section 32 is not in the Controller's list.

The compounding sum is prescribed and cannot exceed the maximum fine for the offence (section 48(3), proviso). The rule 32A table in the Packaged Commodities Rules does not list section 32; our sources give no compounding sum for it. See our article on section 48 and compounding of offences.

After a compounding, the same or a similar offence within three years cannot be compounded again (section 48(4)).

How to avoid the offence

  1. Find out before manufacture or import whether the product is a weight or measure (section 2(w) includes weighing and measuring instruments).
  2. Check whether the first proviso exemption really fits the product: it is narrow, and measuring tapes are excluded from the length-measure item.
  3. Submit the model to the prescribed authority in the prescribed manner, and keep the application and approval on file. Our existing guide on how to apply for model approval covers the practical steps; the procedure, fee and authority are prescribed and are not in our sources, so check the rules.
  4. For imports, pair the model approval with importer registration under section 19.

Example 1. A firm begins manufacturing platform scales without ever submitting the model. The default is failing to submit the model, which is section 32.

Example 2. A firm submits the model, and approval is pending while it plans a trial batch. Section 32 punishes failure to submit; the pending application is not itself the default, but section 22 requires approval before manufacturing, so a trial batch before approval needs care.

Need help with approval or a notice?

If you are planning a new instrument, or have received a notice for not submitting a model, the order of steps matters. Our legal consultation team can check the product against section 22, set out which layer of section 32 applies, and explain whether compounding is open. Bring the product details, any import papers and the notice.

Key takeaways

  • Section 32 punishes failing or omitting to submit a model of a weight or measure for approval (the duty in section 22).
  • As enacted: fine up to Rs 20,000; repeat offence, imprisonment up to one year and also fine. The 2023 Act does not amend it.
  • The 2026 Act would replace this with an improvement notice, then penalty up to Rs 5 lakh, then fine of Rs 10 lakh to Rs 20 lakh; applicable only from the notified date.
  • Only the Director (not the Controller) can compound a section 32 offence.
  • Submit before manufacture or import; the procedure and fee are prescribed rules not in our sources.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 (Act 1 of 2010) as enacted, read with the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2023 (in force; it does not amend section 32) and the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2026 (Act 8 of 2026; its change to section 32 applies only from the date the Central Government notifies), as on 30 September 2026. State Legal Metrology rules, later amendments and notifications change; verify the current position before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Section 32

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Is section 32 about unapproved instruments in use?

No. It punishes failure or omission to submit the model for approval.

Did the 2023 Act change section 32?

No.

Ask the question before you sign — it is always cheaper than asking it afterwards.

— TaxClue Compliance Desk

Section 32: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,327 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

No. It punishes failure or omission to submit the model for approval.

No.

It would replace the penalty with an improvement notice, then a penalty up to Rs 5 lakh, then a fine of Rs 10 lakh to Rs 20 lakh, from the notified date.

No. Section 48(3) omits it; the Director may compound under section 48(2).

Section 22's first proviso says approval may not be required for the listed items. Check the exact wording.

It is prescribed by rules under section 52(2)(m).