Next due
11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026due today 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 4 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 9 days 21 OCTTax Audit Report · Form 3CA/3CB · AY 2026-27 · extended from 30 Sepin 10 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 19 days 7 NOVTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Oct 2026in 27 days 21 NOVITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27 · extended from 31 Octin 41 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 49 days
All due dates

Sections 32–34 of the Designs Act, 2000: Powers of Controller, Hearing and Directions of Central Government

s.32: subject to any rules, in any proceedings before him the Controller has the powers of a civil court for receiving evidence, administering oaths, enforcing attendance of...

Published
Updated
Reading time
8 min
Views
10
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Medium Complexity
  • In-Depth Guide
Topic
Design Registration
Published
October 1, 2026
Last updated
Oct 10, 2026
Reading time
8 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Chapter VII is headed "Power and Duties of Controller". Section 32 gives the Controller the powers of a civil court for six listed purposes, including awarding costs that are executable like a decree. Section 33 says he must not use a discretionary power against an applicant without giving a hearing if the applicant asks in time. Section 34 lets him seek directions from the Central Government in cases of doubt or difficulty. If you face an objection or a hearing, our design objection reply team prepares you for it.

Section 32: powers of a civil court

"Subject to any rules in this behalf, the Controller in any proceedings before him under this Act shall have the powers of a civil court for the purpose of receiving evidence, administering oaths, enforcing the attendance of witnesses, compelling the discovery and production of documents, issuing commissions for the examining of witnesses and awarding costs and such award shall be executable in any court having jurisdiction as if it were a decree of that court."

(The text prints "s hall" and "production of under documents"; both are misprints. Read "shall" and "production of documents".)

PowerWhat it lets the Controller do
Receiving evidenceTake evidence in the proceeding
Administering oathsPut witnesses and deponents on oath
Enforcing attendance of witnessesCompel a witness to come
Compelling discovery and production of documentsOrder documents to be disclosed and produced
Issuing commissions for examining witnessesHave a witness examined elsewhere by a commissioner
Awarding costsMake a costs order

Four points.

  1. Only for these purposes. The text says "for the purpose of" the listed items. It does not say the Controller has all the powers of a civil court. We do not add to the list.
  2. "In any proceedings before him under this Act." The powers apply to proceedings such as examination, cancellation petitions, rectification and restoration, to the extent the Act gives him jurisdiction.
  3. "Subject to any rules in this behalf." The Designs Rules, 2001 regulate how the powers are used; see our sibling article on rule 43 and the scale of costs.
  4. Costs as a decree. An award of costs "shall be executable in any court having jurisdiction as if it were a decree of that court". So a party who is awarded costs may enforce them in a court, not only by asking the Controller.

The Controller's power to take evidence interacts with section 37, under which evidence is by affidavit unless he directs otherwise; see our article on sections 37–41.

Section 33: a hearing before an adverse discretionary order

"Where any discretionary power is by or under this Act given to Controller, he shall not exercise that power adversely to the applicant for registration of a design without (if so required within the prescribed time by the applicant) giving the applicant an opportunity of being heard."

(The text omits "the" before "Controller".)

Reading it clause by clause.

  • "Any discretionary power ... by or under this Act": the Act is full of "may". For example, the Controller "may ... refuse to register" under section 5(4), "may" refuse on public-order grounds under section 35 and "may" withdraw a matter under section 3(4).
  • "Adversely to the applicant for registration of a design": the protection is for the applicant for registration. The section does not name opponents, petitioners or registered proprietors. We do not extend it to them; the text is silent on it, and other sections or the Rules may give hearings elsewhere (for example, section 8(5) expressly requires an opportunity to be heard in a dispute between joint applicants).
  • "If so required within the prescribed time by the applicant": the hearing is on request, and the request must be made within the prescribed time. The time is in the Rules, not in the Act. See our sibling article on rules 44 and 45.

The practical consequence is that an applicant who wants to be heard must ask, in time. If the applicant does not ask within the prescribed time, the Act does not oblige the Controller to hold a hearing before using his discretion adversely.

Section 34: directions from the Central Government

"The Controller may, in any case of doubt or difficulty arising in the administration of any of the provisions of this Act, apply to the Central Government for directions in the matter."

  • Who: the Controller.
  • When: "in any case of doubt or difficulty arising in the administration of any of the provisions of this Act".
  • What: he "may" apply to the Central Government for directions.

The section is permissive. It gives no right to a party to ask the Central Government to intervene, and does not say what the Controller does with the directions. It does not say that the directions bind the Controller in a quasi-judicial decision. We leave that point where the text leaves it. See also section 3, under which the Central Government appoints examiners and other officers; our article on section 3 covers the structure.

What these sections do not say

  • They do not give the Controller the powers of a civil court for purposes beyond the six listed.
  • They do not fix the time within which a hearing must be requested; that is "prescribed".
  • They do not say how the Controller's discretionary decision may be challenged; appeals are given by specific sections (5(4), 19(2), 31(3) and 35(2)).
  • They do not name any scale of costs; the Rules do.

Illustration (invented)

Solace Seating Pvt. Ltd. applies to register a woven stool. The Controller, after the examiner's report, intends to refuse registration, a discretionary power under section 5(4). Before he does so, Solace asks within the prescribed time to be heard. Under section 33, he must give Solace an opportunity of being heard before refusing. At the hearing, Solace files an affidavit and calls a witness whom the Controller can compel to attend under section 32.

In another matter, a cancellation petitioner, Birch Interiors, is awarded costs against the registered proprietor. The Controller's award is executable in any court with jurisdiction as if it were a decree (section 32). If the Controller were uncertain how a provision applied to a novel type of article, he could apply to the Central Government for directions under section 34.

Need help in a Controller's hearing?

A hearing can be decisive, and the request for it must be made in time. Our design objection reply team prepares the request, the affidavit and the arguments, and handles any costs question.

Key takeaways

  • The Controller has civil court powers to receive evidence, administer oaths, enforce attendance, compel discovery and production, issue commissions and award costs.
  • Costs awarded by the Controller are executable in any court having jurisdiction as if a decree.
  • He must not use a discretionary power adversely to an applicant for registration without a hearing, if the applicant requires one within the prescribed time.
  • In case of doubt or difficulty he may apply to the Central Government for directions.
  • The time to ask for a hearing and the scale of costs are in the Rules, not in the Act.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the Designs Act, 2000 as enacted, as consulted on 1 October 2026. Forms, fees and procedure are set by the Designs Rules, 2001 as amended from time to time. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Sections 32

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Does the Controller have all the powers of a civil court?

No. Section 32 gives him those powers for six listed purposes only.

Are costs awarded by the Controller enforceable?

Yes. Section 32 says the award is executable in any court having jurisdiction as if it were a decree.

File before you disclose — for patents and designs, publicity can cost you the right.

— TaxClue IP Desk

Sections 32: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,350 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

No. Section 32 gives him those powers for six listed purposes only.

Yes. Section 32 says the award is executable in any court having jurisdiction as if it were a decree.

Under section 33, if you require it within the prescribed time, the Controller must give you an opportunity of being heard before exercising a discretionary power adversely to you.

The Act leaves it to the Rules.

Section 34 lets the Controller apply to the Central Government; it gives no right to a party.

It speaks of "the applicant for registration of a design". The text is silent on others.