Next dueCompany / ROC
14 OCTADT-1 · Auditor appointment (after AGM)in 3 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 19 days 31 OCTMSME-1 · Dues to MSMEs · Apr–Sep 2026in 20 days 21 NOVITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27 · extended from 31 Octin 41 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 49 days 30 JUNDPT-3 · Return of deposits · FY 2026-27in 262 days 11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026due today 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 4 days
All due dates

Sections 26–28 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010: the punishment for failing to comply with the Tribunal's orders, and offences by companies and by Government Departments

Section 26: failing to comply with any order, award or decision of the Tribunal is punishable with imprisonment up to three years, or fine up to ten crore rupees, or both, and a...

Published
Updated
Reading time
8 min
Views
8
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Medium Complexity
  • In-Depth Guide
Topic
Registrations & Licenses
Published
October 3, 2026
Last updated
Oct 10, 2026
Reading time
8 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Chapter IV of the NGT Act is its penalty chapter, and it is short. Section 26 makes failure to comply with an order, award or decision of the Tribunal an offence punishable with imprisonment, fine or both, with a much higher fine for a company. Section 27 reaches the people in charge of a company. Section 28 does the same for the Head of a Government Department.

This article is current as amended up to the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021. The Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2023 did not amend this Act, so the figures below are as printed and no revision line applies. Later amendments and notifications should be checked. If a Tribunal order is binding on you or your company, our legal dispute resolution team can help.

Section 26(1): the punishment

"Whoever, fails to comply with any order or award or decision of the Tribunal under this Act, he shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine which may extend to ten crore rupees, or with both and in case the failure or contravention continues, with additional fine which may extend to twenty-five thousand rupees for every day during which such failure or contravention continues after conviction for the first such failure or contravention."

The proviso for companies. "in case a company fails to comply with any order or award or a decision of the Tribunal under this Act, such company shall be punishable with fine which may extend to twenty-five crore rupees, and in case the failure or contravention continues, with additional fine which may extend to one lakh rupees for every day during which such failure or contravention continues after conviction for the first such failure or contravention."

OffenderPunishment as printedContinuing failure
Any personImprisonment up to three years, or fine up to ten crore rupees, or bothAdditional fine up to twenty-five thousand rupees for every day after conviction for the first failure
A companyFine up to twenty-five crore rupeesAdditional fine up to one lakh rupees for every day after conviction for the first failure

Every figure is a ceiling ("may extend to"), and the Act prints no minimum. The daily fine runs only "after conviction for the first such failure or contravention". The offence is failure to comply with an order, award or decision "under this Act", which includes an order for relief, compensation or restitution under sections 15 to 17 and an interim order under section 19.

Section 26(2): non-cognizable

"Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, every offence under this Act shall be deemed to be non-cognizable within the meaning of the said Code." The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has replaced the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Who may bring a complaint is set out in section 30.

Section 27: offences by companies

Section 27(1). Where an offence under the Act has been committed by a company, every person who, at the time of the offence, "was directly in charge of, and was responsible to the company for the conduct of the business of the company", as well as the company, "shall be deemed to be guilty of the offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly". The proviso: no such person is liable if he proves that the offence was committed without his knowledge or that he exercised all due diligence to prevent it.

Section 27(2). Despite sub-section (1), where an offence has been committed by a company and it is proved that it was committed "with the consent or connivance of, or is attributable to any neglect on the part of, any director, manager, secretary or other officer of the company", that person "shall also be deemed to be guilty".

Explanation. "Company" means any body corporate and includes a firm or other association of individuals; "director" in relation to a firm means a partner in the firm.

Section 28: offences by Government Departments

Section 28(1). Where any Department of the Government fails to comply with any order, award or decision of the Tribunal, "the Head of the Department shall be deemed to be guilty of such failure and shall be liable to be proceeded against for having committed an offence under this Act and punished accordingly". The proviso: he is not liable if he proves that the offence was committed without his knowledge or that he exercised all due diligence to prevent it.

Section 28(2). Where the offence was committed with the consent or connivance of, or is attributable to any neglect on the part of, any officer other than the Head of the Department, "such officer shall also be deemed to be guilty of that offence".

The three sections together

SectionWhoConditionDefence
26Any person; a companyFailure to comply with a Tribunal order, award or decisionNone printed
27(1)Persons directly in charge of a company, and the companyOffence by a companyNo knowledge, or all due diligence
27(2)A director, manager, secretary or other officerConsent, connivance or neglect provedNone printed in the sub-section
28(1)Head of a Government DepartmentDepartment fails to complyNo knowledge, or all due diligence
28(2)An officer other than the HeadConsent, connivance or neglectNone printed in the sub-section

The Environment (Protection) Act, Air Act and PLI Act have their own penalty schemes; see for example sections 37, 38 and 38A of the Air Act and sections 16 to 17B of the PLI Act. Those penalties are imposed by adjudicating officers, whereas the offence in section 26 is tried on a complaint.

Practical points

  1. Treat every Tribunal order as binding and record each step of compliance.
  2. Directors: document knowledge and due diligence; sub-section (1) turns on them.
  3. Government Departments: the Head of the Department is the first point of liability under section 28.
  4. Know the appeal route. The appeal to the Supreme Court is in sections 22 to 25.

An example

The Tribunal directs Ganga Textile Dyers Limited to close an outfall by a stated date. The company does not comply. If convicted, the company faces a fine up to twenty-five crore rupees, and a daily fine up to one lakh rupees for each day the failure continues after conviction. The director in charge of the plant can be proceeded against under section 27(1) unless he proves he had no knowledge or exercised all due diligence.

Need help with compliance with an order?

A Tribunal order carries penal consequences if it is ignored. Our legal dispute resolution team can help you plan compliance and advise directors on their position.

Key takeaways

  • Failure to comply with a Tribunal order, award or decision is punishable with imprisonment up to three years, or fine up to ten crore rupees, or both.
  • A company is punishable with fine up to twenty-five crore rupees, with a daily fine up to one lakh rupees after conviction.
  • Persons in charge of a company, and the Head of a Department, can be held guilty, subject to the defences printed.
  • Every offence under the Act is non-cognizable.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 and the Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991 as amended by the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2023 (in force for these Acts from 1 April 2024), the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 as amended by its Amendment Act of 2024 (which applies only in the States and Union territories it names and in States that adopt it), and the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 as amended by the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021, as consulted on 3 October 2026. Later amendments, rules and notifications should be checked. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About NGT Act

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

What is the punishment for not complying with an NGT order?

Imprisonment up to three years, or fine up to ten crore rupees, or both, with an additional fine up to twenty-five thousand rupees a day after conviction while the failure continues.

What is the punishment for a company?

Fine up to twenty-five crore rupees, with an additional fine up to one lakh rupees for every day the failure continues after conviction for the first failure.

State rules differ more than founders expect — check the State before copying another city's checklist.

— TaxClue Business Setup Desk

NGT Act: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,350 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

Imprisonment up to three years, or fine up to ten crore rupees, or both, with an additional fine up to twenty-five thousand rupees a day after conviction while the failure continues.

Fine up to twenty-five crore rupees, with an additional fine up to one lakh rupees for every day the failure continues after conviction for the first failure.

Yes, under section 27, if they were directly in charge of the business, or the offence was committed with their consent or connivance or is attributable to their neglect, subject to the defences.

Under section 28 the Head of the Department is deemed guilty, subject to proof of no knowledge or due diligence.

No. Section 26(2) deems every offence under the Act non-cognizable.

No. It did not amend the NGT Act.