Next due
11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 2 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 6 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 11 days 21 OCTTax Audit Report · Form 3CA/3CB · AY 2026-27 · extended from 30 Sepin 12 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 21 days 7 NOVTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Oct 2026in 29 days 21 NOVITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27 · extended from 31 Octin 43 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 51 days
All due dates

Sections 25-26 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882: Conditional Transfer and Fulfilment of a Condition Precedent

Section 25: an interest that depends on a condition fails if fulfilment of the condition is impossible, forbidden by law, would defeat the provisions of any law if permitted, is...

Published
Updated
Reading time
7 min
Views
8
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Medium Complexity
Topic
Property Law
Published
October 2, 2026
Last updated
Oct 9, 2026
Reading time
7 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Property is often transferred on a condition. Sections 25 and 26 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 say which conditions make the interest fail, and how strictly a condition that must be met first has to be carried out. This article reads them as per the text of the Act consulted, with the Act's own illustrations retold.

Section 25: conditions that make the interest fail

Section 25 begins: "An interest created on a transfer of property and dependent upon a condition fails if..." and then lists six situations. The table shows them in plain words; agreement drafting support can test a draft deed against them before it is signed.

Situation in the textWhat it means
Fulfilment of the condition is impossibleIt cannot be done at all
Fulfilment is forbidden by lawDoing it would break a law
It is of such a nature that, if permitted, it would defeat the provisions of any lawAllowing it would undo what a law provides
It is fraudulentThe condition is a fraud
It involves or implies injury to the person or property of anotherHarm to another is part of it
The Court regards it as immoral or opposed to public policyA judgment about morals or public policy

Note that the interest fails, not just the condition. This is the difference from some other sections, such as section 10, where the condition is void and the transfer stands. Our article on sections 10 to 12, conditions restraining alienation covers that group.

The Act's illustrations, retold

  • (a) A lets a farm to B on condition that B shall walk a hundred miles in an hour. The lease is void. The condition is impossible.
  • (b) A gives Rs. 500 to B on condition that B shall marry A's daughter C. At the date of the transfer C was dead. The transfer is void. The condition cannot be fulfilled.
  • (c) A transfers Rs. 500 to B on condition that B shall murder C. The transfer is void. The condition is forbidden by law and involves injury to another.
  • (d) A transfers Rs. 500 to his niece C, if she will desert her husband. The transfer is void.

The amounts and the setting belong to the old text. The Act's wording is quoted as it stands; the modern reader should focus on the rule, not the amounts.

Present-day examples

  • Sunita Rao gives a flat to her nephew Aman "if he lands on the moon within a year". The condition is impossible for all practical purposes, so the interest fails.
  • Bharat Oberoi transfers a shop to his manager on condition that the manager forges a signature on a land paper. The condition is fraudulent and forbidden by law. The interest fails.
  • A deed makes a gift depend on the donee harming a neighbour's crop. The condition involves injury to the property of another. The interest fails.

The last ground, "immoral or opposed to public policy", is tied to what the Court regards. The section does not list examples. It is wise to avoid conditions that could be described in that way. A short review before the deed is signed helps remove them.

The link with the Contract Act

The Transfer of Property Act, by section 4, is read with the Indian Contract Act, 1872 where it deals with contracts. Unlawful object and consideration are covered in the Contract Act; see our article on lawful consideration and lawful object under section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 and check the current text of that Act. Section 25 of the Transfer of Property Act is not the same provision as section 25 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, which is about agreements without consideration.

Section 26: fulfilment of a condition precedent

A condition precedent is a condition to be fulfilled before a person can take an interest. Section 26 says it "shall be deemed to have been fulfilled if it has been substantially complied with."

The rule is not about perfect performance. It asks whether the condition was substantially met.

The Act's illustrations, retold

  • (a) A transfers Rs. 5,000 to B on condition that B shall marry with the consent of C, D and E. E dies. B marries with the consent of C and D. B is deemed to have fulfilled the condition.
  • (b) A transfers Rs. 5,000 to B on condition that B shall marry with the consent of C, D and E. B marries without the consent of C, D and E, but obtains their consent after the marriage. B has not fulfilled the condition.

The difference between the two is that in (a) the consent of the living persons was obtained before the marriage and one person had died, so the condition was substantially complied with. In (b) the consent came after the event, so the condition as to prior consent was not complied with.

Present-day example

Meghna Pillai transfers a house to her son Rahul on condition that he obtains his professional degree and a certificate from the board before taking possession. Rahul completes all coursework and passes, but the board's certificate is delayed by a few weeks for administrative reasons. A court asked to apply section 26 would look at whether the condition was substantially complied with. The safer course is to draft the condition so that the required document and the date are clear.

Drafting checklist

  1. Test every condition against the six grounds in section 25. If one applies, the interest fails.
  2. State the condition precisely. A clear condition makes "substantial compliance" easier to judge.
  3. Say who decides whether the condition has been met and by when.
  4. Do not rely on later consent or later performance if the condition requires it to come first, as illustration (b) of section 26 shows.
  5. Keep proof that the condition was fulfilled.
  6. Consider related rules. Conditions that end an interest are in sections 27 to 34; see our articles on sections 27 to 30 and sections 31 to 34.

For the effect of a contingent event in a transfer more generally, see our article on sections 22 to 24.

Need help drafting a conditional gift or transfer?

A condition that fails can bring down the whole interest. If you are drafting or reading a transfer that depends on a condition, our team can help you word it clearly through agreement drafting.

Key takeaways

  • Under section 25, an interest dependent on a condition fails if the condition is impossible, forbidden by law, would defeat a law, is fraudulent, involves injury to another, or is regarded by the Court as immoral or opposed to public policy.
  • The interest fails; this differs from section 10, where the condition is void and the transfer stands.
  • Under section 26, a condition precedent is deemed fulfilled if substantially complied with.
  • Prior consent that arrives only after the event does not meet a condition requiring prior consent.
  • Draft conditions clearly and keep proof of performance.
  • Later amendments and State changes should be checked.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on a publisher's print of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 showing amendments up to the Transfer of Property (Amendment) Act, 2002 (3 of 2003), as consulted on 2 October 2026. State amendments, later amendments, stamp duty and registration charges are not covered and should be checked. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Sections 25-26

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

What happens to a transfer on an impossible condition?

Under section 25 the interest fails if fulfilment of the condition is impossible.

Does section 25 apply only to conditions that are illegal?

No. It also covers impossible conditions, fraudulent ones, those involving injury to another, and those the Court regards as immoral or opposed to public policy.

Keep your documents in an order a stranger could follow — one day an officer or auditor will have to.

— TaxClue Compliance Desk

Sections 25-26: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,350 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

Under section 25 the interest fails if fulfilment of the condition is impossible.

No. It also covers impossible conditions, fraudulent ones, those involving injury to another, and those the Court regards as immoral or opposed to public policy.

Section 26 deems a condition precedent fulfilled if it has been substantially complied with. The text does not define "substantially"; the facts and the wording of the condition matter.

In the Act's illustration (a) under section 26, E dies, B marries with the consent of C and D, and B is deemed to have fulfilled the condition.

In the Act's illustration (b), B marries without consent but obtains it after the marriage. B has not fulfilled the condition.

No. They are different provisions of different Acts.