Next due
7 OCTTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Sep 2026in 2 days 11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 6 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 10 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 15 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 25 days 31 OCTITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27in 26 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 55 days 15 DECAdvance Tax · 3rd (75%) instalment · FY 2026-27in 71 days
All due dates
FEMA Live

Section 2 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999: person, person resident in India and person resident outside India

"Person" is defined widely to include individuals, Hindu undivided families, companies, firms, associations, artificial juridical persons and any agency, office or branch owned or...

Published
Updated
Reading time
9 min
Views
8
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • High Complexity
  • In-Depth Guide
Topic
FEMA
Published
October 2, 2026
Last updated
Oct 5, 2026
Reading time
9 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Almost every restriction in the Act turns on one question: is the person resident in India or resident outside India? Clauses (u), (v) and (w) of section 2 answer it. This article takes those three clauses only, not the whole of section 2, and explains how the test works for individuals, companies, offices and branches. If you need the test applied to a real case, our FEMA advisory team does this regularly.

About this article

This article is based on the consolidated text of the Act consulted (amendments shown up to Act 50 of 2019). Later amendments should be checked. For the other terms in the section, see our post on key definitions under FEMA, section 2. Clauses (u), (v) and (w) are printed without any amending footnote in the copy consulted.

Who is a "person" (section 2(u))

Section 2(u) says "person" includes:

  1. an individual;
  2. a Hindu undivided family;
  3. a company;
  4. a firm;
  5. an association of persons or a body of individuals, whether incorporated or not;
  6. every artificial juridical person not falling within the preceding sub-clauses; and
  7. any agency, office or branch owned or controlled by such person.

The list uses "includes", so it is not closed in form, but sub-clause (vi) already sweeps in any artificial juridical person that is not one of the earlier kinds. Sub-clause (vii) matters in practice: a branch or office is treated as a person in its own right when it is owned or controlled by a person in the list.

Who is a "person resident in India" (section 2(v))

Section 2(v) gives four limbs. A person resident in India means:

LimbText of the Act, in plain wordsWho it catches
(i)A person residing in India for more than one hundred and eighty-two days during the course of the preceding financial year, but not a person within exclusion (A) or (B)Individuals, mainly
(ii)Any person or body corporate registered or incorporated in IndiaCompanies and other bodies corporate
(iii)An office, branch or agency in India owned or controlled by a person resident outside IndiaThe Indian arm of a foreign person
(iv)An office, branch or agency outside India owned or controlled by a person resident in IndiaThe overseas arm of a resident

Limb (i): the days test and its two exclusions

The days test looks at the preceding financial year, not the current one. A person who resided in India for more than one hundred and eighty-two days in that year is resident, unless one of the two exclusions applies.

Exclusion (A) removes a person who has gone out of India or who stays outside India, in either case:

  • (a) for or on taking up employment outside India;
  • (b) for carrying on outside India a business or vocation outside India; or
  • (c) for any other purpose, in such circumstances as would indicate his intention to stay outside India for an uncertain period.

Exclusion (B) removes a person who has come to or stays in India, in either case, otherwise than:

  • (a) for or on taking up employment in India;
  • (b) for carrying on in India a business or vocation in India; or
  • (c) for any other purpose, in such circumstances as would indicate his intention to stay in India for an uncertain period.

In other words, the 182-day figure is not the whole test. The Act pairs the days with the reason for the stay. A person who goes abroad to take a job, run a business or stay for an uncertain period is outside the net of limb (i), and a person who comes to India for a purpose that does not indicate staying for an uncertain period, and who is not here for employment or business, is likewise outside it. The Act does not give a numerical rule beyond the 182 days, and nothing in the clause is explained by examples; how a particular case is judged depends on its facts, and the rules and regulations should be read for the practical side.

Example. Ananya, an engineer, moves abroad in March to take up a job with an overseas employer. Her stay outside India is "for or on taking up employment outside India", which is exclusion (A)(a). She is therefore outside limb (i), even if she spent more than 182 days in India in the earlier financial year before leaving. On the other hand, Rohit lives in India throughout the preceding year and has not gone abroad for any of the purposes in exclusion (A). He resides in India for more than 182 days and is resident.

Limbs (ii) to (iv): bodies, offices and branches

Limb (ii) does not use a days count at all. A person or body corporate registered or incorporated in India is resident in India. An Indian-incorporated company is therefore always a person resident in India, whatever the nationality of its shareholders. Limbs (iii) and (iv) look at offices, branches and agencies and decide their residence by reference to who owns or controls them:

  • A branch in India of a foreign person is resident in India under limb (iii).
  • A branch abroad of an Indian resident is resident in India under limb (iv), which is why section 1(3) can apply the Act to overseas branches. See our explainer on short title, extent and application.

Person resident outside India (section 2(w))

Section 2(w) is a one-line residual definition: a person resident outside India is a person who is not resident in India. There is no separate test. If limbs (i) to (iv) do not apply to the person, the person is resident outside India. This is the category in which the Act's rules on payments to and from non-residents, on holdings in India by non-residents and on offices of non-residents operate. For the practical rules on NRI status, see our guide on how to determine NRI residential status.

This is not the income-tax test

The Act's definition is its own. It uses the preceding financial year, the 182-day figure and the intention-based exclusions printed above. The income-tax law has its own rules for residential status, based on different periods and conditions, and the two tests can lead to different answers for the same person in the same year. A person can be resident under one law and non-resident under the other. Do not carry a conclusion from one law over to the other. For tax questions, see our income-tax guides, including our NRI taxation guide.

Why the classification matters

Classification as resident or non-resident decides which rules apply. Section 3 deals with payments to and from persons resident outside India, section 4 speaks of persons resident in India holding foreign exchange, foreign security and immovable property outside India, and section 6(4) and (5) deal with assets acquired when a person was resident on the other side of the line. Our later articles explain each of those provisions.

Need help with a residential-status question?

Residence under the Act decides which rules apply to a remittance, an account or an investment, and a wrong call can lead to a contravention. If you want a second opinion on how limbs (i) to (iv) apply to your case, our FEMA advisory team can work through the facts with you. We also help companies with overseas branches and individuals who are changing country.

Key takeaways

  • "Person" includes individuals, HUFs, companies, firms, associations, artificial juridical persons and agencies, offices or branches owned or controlled by them (section 2(u)).
  • Under section 2(v)(i), residing in India for more than one hundred and eighty-two days during the preceding financial year makes a person resident, subject to exclusions (A) and (B) which look at purpose and intention.
  • Persons or bodies corporate registered or incorporated in India are resident in India (section 2(v)(ii)).
  • Offices, branches and agencies are classified by who owns or controls them (section 2(v)(iii) and (iv)).
  • A person resident outside India is simply a person who is not resident in India (section 2(w)).
  • The Act's test is not the income-tax test, so check each law separately.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on a consolidated text of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 showing amendments up to Act 50 of 2019, as consulted on 2 October 2026. Limits, forms, timelines and procedures are set by rules, regulations and Reserve Bank directions made under the Act; they change from time to time and are not covered here. Later amendments should be checked. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Section 2

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

How many days make me a person resident in India under FEMA?

Section 2(v)(i) refers to residing in India for more than one hundred and eighty-two days during the course of the preceding financial year. The same clause then excludes persons covered by exclusion (A) or (B), so the days count is not the only factor.

Which financial year is counted?

The preceding financial year, as the clause says, not the current one.

Classification and valuation decide the duty — settle them before the goods sail.

— TaxClue Trade & FEMA Desk

Section 2: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,327 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

Section 2(v)(i) refers to residing in India for more than one hundred and eighty-two days during the course of the preceding financial year. The same clause then excludes persons covered by exclusion (A) or (B), so the days count is not the only factor.

The preceding financial year, as the clause says, not the current one.

Yes. Section 2(v)(ii) covers any person or body corporate registered or incorporated in India.

No. The two laws have separate definitions and can give different answers for the same person. See our income-tax guides for the tax position.

Under section 2(v)(iv), an office, branch or agency outside India owned or controlled by a person resident in India is a person resident in India. Section 2(u)(vii) also lists such an office or branch as a person.

Section 2(w) defines such a person as one who is not resident in India.