Next due
11 NOVGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Oct 2026in 3 days 15 NOVPF & ESI · Contributions · Oct 2026in 7 days 20 NOVGSTR-3B · Summary return · Oct 2026in 12 days 21 NOVITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27 · extended from 31 Octin 13 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 21 days 7 DECTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Nov 2026in 29 days 15 DECAdvance Tax · 3rd (75%) instalment · FY 2026-27in 37 days 31 DECGSTR-9 / 9C · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 53 days
All due dates

Sections 179 and 180 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Adjudicating Authority for individuals and partnership firms and bar on civil courts

For insolvency matters of individuals and firms, the Adjudicating Authority is the Debt Recovery Tribunal with territorial jurisdiction over where the individual debtor actually...

Published
Updated
Reading time
9 min
Questions
6 answered
  • High Complexity
  • In-Depth Guide
Topic
IBC Insolvency
Published
October 2, 2026
Last updated
Oct 2, 2026
Reading time
9 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Section 179 names the Debt Recovery Tribunal with territorial jurisdiction over where the individual debtor resides, carries on business or personally works for gain as the Adjudicating Authority for individuals and firms, sets out its jurisdiction over suits, claims and questions of priority, and excludes the moratorium period from limitation. Section 180 bars civil courts and injunctions in matters within the jurisdiction of the Debt Recovery Tribunal and the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal.

The article follows the IBBI consolidated text of the Code amended up to 12 August 2021 (the "consolidated text").

Section 179(1): who is the Adjudicating Authority

"Subject to the provisions of section 60, the Adjudicating Authority, in relation to insolvency matters of individuals and firms shall be the Debt Recovery Tribunal having territorial jurisdiction over the place where the individual debtor actually and voluntarily resides or carries on business or personally works for gain and can entertain an application under this Code regarding such person."

Three things to read in the sentence.

  1. "Subject to the provisions of section 60." Section 60 is the provision on the Adjudicating Authority for corporate persons. The reference makes section 179 yield to it where section 60 applies; this article does not explain section 60.
  2. Territorial test. Three alternatives are listed: the place where the individual debtor "actually and voluntarily resides", "carries on business" or "personally works for gain". The adverbs "actually and voluntarily" qualify residence.
  3. "Can entertain an application under this Code regarding such person." The tribunal must be one that can entertain the application.

For Part III, section 79(1) defines "Adjudicating Authority" as the Debt Recovery Tribunal constituted under sub-section (1) of section 3 of the "Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 (51 of 1993)". The reader should check the current law for the corresponding provision of that Act. If you are unsure which Debt Recovery Tribunal has jurisdiction in your matter, a legal dispute resolution consultation with our team can help you apply the three alternatives to your facts.

Section 179(2): the tribunal's jurisdiction

"The Debt Recovery Tribunal shall, notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, have jurisdiction to entertain or dispose of –"

ClauseSubject
(a)Any suit or proceeding by or against the individual debtor
(b)Any claim made by or against the individual debtor
(c)Any question of priorities or any other question whether of law or facts, arising out of or in relation to insolvency and bankruptcy of the individual debtor or firm under this Code

The "notwithstanding" clause overrides inconsistent provisions in other laws. Clauses (a) and (b) cover suits, proceedings and claims by or against the individual debtor. Clause (c) covers questions of priorities and any other question of law or fact arising out of or in relation to the insolvency and bankruptcy of the individual debtor or firm. The priority questions connect to the order of payment in section 178; see the live post on the priority of payment of debts under section 178.

Section 179(3): limitation and the moratorium

"Notwithstanding anything contained in the Limitation Act, 1963 (14 of 1963) or in any other law for the time being in force, in computing the period of limitation specified for any suit or application in the name and on behalf of a debtor for which an order of moratorium has been made under this Part, the period during which such moratorium is in place shall be excluded."

The exclusion works for "any suit or application in the name and on behalf of a debtor" for which "an order of moratorium has been made under this Part". The period of the moratorium is excluded in computing the period of limitation. The reader should check the current law for the corresponding provision of the Limitation Act, 1963. For limitation more generally within the Code, see the live post on the law of limitation under section 238A, which is a different provision.

Section 180: civil court not to have jurisdiction

Sub-sectionRule
(1)"No civil court or authority shall have jurisdiction to entertain any suit or proceedings in respect of any matter on which the Debt Recovery Tribunal or the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal has jurisdiction under this Code"
(2)"No injunction shall be granted by any court, tribunal or authority in respect of any action taken, or to be taken, in pursuance of any power conferred on the Debt Recovery Tribunal or the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal by or under this Code"

Sub-section (1) is a bar on jurisdiction: any "civil court or authority". Sub-section (2) goes wider on a different subject: no injunction may be granted by "any court, tribunal or authority" in respect of an action taken, or to be taken, under a power conferred on either of the two tribunals by or under the Code. The bar in (2) covers actions "to be taken" as well as those already taken.

How the two sections fit together

The structure of Part III's adjudication is: Debt Recovery Tribunal at first instance (section 179), Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal on appeal (section 181), Supreme Court on a question of law (section 182), and civil courts shut out (section 180). Appeals are covered in Sections 181 to 183A of this series. The live post on DRT jurisdiction in individual insolvency and the appeal route also deals with this ground.

A worked example

Manisha Kulkarni runs a boutique in Pune but lives with her family in Satara. A creditor wants to start proceedings against her under Part III. Under section 179(1), the Debt Recovery Tribunal that has territorial jurisdiction over the place where she "actually and voluntarily resides or carries on business or personally works for gain" and that can entertain the application is the Adjudicating Authority, subject to section 60. Because the section lists the three places in the alternative, more than one tribunal may have a claim to the matter, and the text does not give a rule for choosing between them; this article does not add one.

While a moratorium is in place under Part III, Manisha has a time-limited suit that she wants to file in her own name. Under section 179(3), the period of the moratorium is excluded in computing limitation for that suit. If a debtor tries to obtain an injunction from a civil court against a step taken by the Debt Recovery Tribunal under the Code, sections 180(1) and (2) are the answer on the face of the text. The names and facts are invented.

Law around these sections

The Amendment Act, 2026 (No. 6 of 2026) has no clause that amends sections 179 or 180. It comes into force on the date or dates the Central Government notifies; the notification is not in the texts consulted, so check whether any change to a related provision has been notified.

For personal guarantors to corporate debtors, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Bankruptcy Process for Personal Guarantors to Corporate Debtors) Regulations, 2019 (the copy consulted is amended up to 02-06-2026) apply alongside Part III; no rules or regulations for other individuals or for partnership firms are in the texts consulted.

Amendments and notifications made after 12 August 2021, other than the Amendment Act, 2026, are not in the texts consulted and should be checked.

Need help deciding where a Part III matter belongs?

Debtors, creditors and professionals dealing with an individual or firm need to know which tribunal has jurisdiction, what it can hear and what a civil court cannot. Our team can help you apply sections 179 and 180 to your facts through a legal dispute resolution engagement.

Key takeaways

  • In Part III the Adjudicating Authority is the Debt Recovery Tribunal, subject to section 60.
  • Territorial jurisdiction follows where the individual debtor actually and voluntarily resides, carries on business or personally works for gain.
  • The tribunal has jurisdiction over suits, proceedings and claims by or against the individual debtor and over questions of priorities, law or fact arising from the insolvency or bankruptcy.
  • The moratorium period is excluded in computing limitation for suits and applications on behalf of a debtor.
  • Civil courts have no jurisdiction on matters within the two tribunals' jurisdiction, and no injunction may be granted against action under the Code.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the IBBI consolidated text of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 amended up to 12 August 2021 and on the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2026 (No. 6 of 2026), which comes into force on the date or dates notified by the Central Government, as consulted on 2 October 2026. It explains the words of the statute only; commencement notifications, other amendments made after 12 August 2021, notified thresholds, the rules and IBBI regulations, and the way tribunals and courts apply these sections should be checked. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Sections 179 and 180

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Which tribunal is the Adjudicating Authority for individuals and firms?

The Debt Recovery Tribunal having territorial jurisdiction over the place where the individual debtor actually and voluntarily resides, carries on business or personally works for gain, subject to section 60.

What can the tribunal decide?

Suits and proceedings by or against the individual debtor, claims by or against him, and any question of priorities or other question of law or fact arising out of the insolvency and bankruptcy of the individual debtor or firm.

Conversion changes the form of the business, not its past obligations.

— TaxClue LLP & Partnership Desk

Sections 179 and 180: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
Vikas Sharma Tax & Compliance Expert at TaxClue

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Updated:

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

The Debt Recovery Tribunal having territorial jurisdiction over the place where the individual debtor actually and voluntarily resides, carries on business or personally works for gain, subject to section 60.

Suits and proceedings by or against the individual debtor, claims by or against him, and any question of priorities or other question of law or fact arising out of the insolvency and bankruptcy of the individual debtor or firm.

Yes. Section 179(3) excludes the period of the moratorium in computing limitation for any suit or application in the name and on behalf of a debtor for which a moratorium order has been made under Part III.

No. Section 180(1) says no civil court or authority has jurisdiction on any matter on which the Debt Recovery Tribunal or the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal has jurisdiction under the Code.

Section 180(2) says no injunction shall be granted by any court, tribunal or authority in respect of any action taken, or to be taken, under a power conferred on either tribunal by or under the Code.

To the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal under section 181, and on a question of law to the Supreme Court under section 182.