GST LIVE

Clauses (e) and (f): Composition Supplies and Non-Residents

Two short clauses that mostly restate what other provisions already achieve — and one of them has a practical consequence for anyone buying from a composition dealer.

Vikas Sharma Tax & Compliance Expert
5 min read 6 views Updated Sep 6, 2026 Expert Reviewed Medium Complexity
Clauses (e) and (f): Composition Supplies and Non-Residents
0:00
Last updated: September 2026Verified against: Government sources
Quick Answer

Two short clauses that mostly restate what other provisions already achieve — and one of them has a practical consequence for anyone buying from a composition dealer.

Two of the shortest clauses in s.17(5). Neither is contentious, and both are worth understanding because they explain why certain purchases never produce credit no matter how the invoice looks.

Clause (e): supplies from a composition dealer

Section 10 allows an eligible small supplier to pay tax at a flat percentage of turnover instead of the normal rate, with no credit on inputs.

Two features of the scheme make clause (e) almost self-executing:

A composition dealer cannot collect tax. Section 10(4): a taxable person paying tax under s.10 shall not collect any tax from the recipient on supplies made by him, and shall not be entitled to any credit of input tax.

A composition dealer issues a bill of supply. Section 31(3)(c) read with Rule 49 — not a tax invoice. And Rule 49 requires the bill of supply of a composition taxpayer to carry the words "composition taxable person, not eligible to collect tax on supplies".

So the recipient never receives a tax invoice, never sees a tax amount, and has nothing to claim. Clause (e) closes the theoretical gap.

Why clause (e) still matters

Cost, not credit. A business buying from a composition dealer bears the composition tax embedded in the price with no recovery. Where the same input is available from a regular supplier at a comparable price, the regular supplier is cheaper after credit — often materially so.

Procurement policy. For a business with substantial input spend, a supplier's registration status is a price factor, not a compliance detail. A quote from a composition dealer at ₹100 and a quote from a regular dealer at ₹112 (₹100 + 12 tax, fully creditable) cost the same.

Reverse charge is unaffected. Where a supply from a composition dealer attracts tax under reverse charge in the recipient's hands, the recipient pays that tax and takes credit of it under the ordinary rules. Clause (e) blocks credit of tax paid under s.10, not tax paid by the recipient under s.9(3) or s.9(4).

GSTR-9 Table 16A. The annual return requires disclosure of supplies received from composition taxpayers, which is a direct prompt to identify them in the purchase ledger. Most systems do not flag them, and the disclosure is frequently left blank.

Clause (f): non-resident taxable persons

A non-resident taxable person under s.2(77) is a person who occasionally undertakes transactions involving supply, but who has no fixed place of business or residence in India.

Clause (f) blocks credit on everything such a person receives, except goods imported by him.

The clause mirrors s.24(1), which contains the same restriction in the registration provisions. Having it in both places is belt and braces.

What the NRTP can claim: IGST paid on the import of goods, evidenced by the bill of entry.

What it cannot claim: exhibition stall rental, local logistics, local professional services, hotel accommodation, and anything else procured in India.

The rationale is administrative — a registration valid for ninety days, extendable by ninety, held by a person with no Indian presence, offers no realistic basis for post-departure verification of Indian procurements. The import is different because customs already records it.

ITC for casual and non-resident taxable persons →

What clause (f) does not cover

Casual taxable persons. A CTP has a fixed place of business elsewhere in India and is not covered by clause (f). It takes credit like any other registered person.

Foreign companies with an Indian registration as an ordinary taxpayer. A foreign entity with a fixed establishment in India registers normally, not as an NRTP, and clause (f) does not apply.

OIDAR suppliers registered under s.14 of the IGST Act. They operate under a simplified registration and file GSTR-5A; the credit question does not arise in the same way because they have no Indian procurements to speak of.

Key takeaways

  • Clause (e) blocks credit on supplies on which tax was paid under s.10 — the composition levy.
  • A composition dealer issues a bill of supply and cannot collect tax, so there is nothing to claim.
  • Composition tax is an embedded cost — a supplier's registration status is a price factor.
  • Clause (e) does not block RCM credit where the recipient itself pays the tax.
  • Clause (f) blocks all credit for a non-resident taxable person except on goods imported by him.
  • Casual taxable persons are not covered by clause (f).

Read next

Disclaimer: Positions stated as on 5 September 2026, based on the CGST Act as amended to 31 March 2026 (ICAI Bare Law, 12th edition) and the ICAI Handbook on Blocked Credit under GST (November 2025).

Key Facts About Clauses

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Can I claim ITC on a purchase from a composition dealer?

No. Clause (e) blocks credit on supplies on which tax has been paid under section 10, and in any event the dealer issues a bill of supply carrying no tax.

Does that make composition suppliers more expensive?

Effectively yes for a registered buyer, because the composition tax is embedded in the price and cannot be recovered.

Over 90% of compliance penalties in India arise from missed due dates — timely handling can save businesses thousands of rupees each year.

— TaxClue Compliance Desk

Clauses: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Frequently Asked Questions
Can I claim ITC on a purchase from a composition dealer?
No. Clause (e) blocks credit on supplies on which tax has been paid under section 10, and in any event the dealer issues a bill of supply carrying no tax.
Does that make composition suppliers more expensive?
Effectively yes for a registered buyer, because the composition tax is embedded in the price and cannot be recovered.
Can I claim credit of reverse charge tax on a supply from a composition dealer?
Yes. Clause (e) blocks credit of tax paid under section 10, not tax paid by the recipient under reverse charge.
Can a non-resident taxable person claim any credit?
Only on goods imported by him. Everything else is blocked by clause (f) and by section 24(1).
Does clause (f) apply to a casual taxable person?
No. A casual taxable person has a fixed place of business elsewhere in India and takes credit normally.
Where are composition purchases reported?
In GSTR-9 Table 16A — supplies received from composition taxpayers.

Was this article helpful?

Thank you for your feedback!
VS
Vikas Sharma VERIFIED EXPERT
7431 articles
Tax & Compliance Expert
Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.
Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

Related Guides

All guides →