Next due
7 OCTTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Sep 2026tomorrow 11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 5 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 9 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 14 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 24 days 31 OCTITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27in 25 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 54 days 15 DECAdvance Tax · 3rd (75%) instalment · FY 2026-27in 70 days
All due dates
Customs Live

Section 137 of the Customs Act, 1962: cognizance and compounding of offences

No court takes cognizance of an offence under section 132, 133, 134, 135 or 135A (and a section the copy refers to as 135AA) without previous sanction of the Principal...

Published
Updated
Reading time
8 min
Views
5
Questions
7 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • High Complexity
  • In-Depth Guide
Topic
Customs
Published
October 2, 2026
Last updated
Oct 5, 2026
Reading time
8 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Section 137 does two jobs. It says that a court may not take cognizance of the main offences in Chapter XVI without the previous sanction of the named authority, and it lets the Principal Chief Commissioner of Customs or Chief Commissioner of Customs compound offences on payment of an amount fixed by rules. A proviso lists the people and cases to whom compounding does not apply.

This article reads the section as per the text on the CBIC portal updated to 30 March 2022 (the Act as amended up to the Finance Act, 2022). Please check later Finance Act changes to section 137 before acting.

Section 137(1): previous sanction for the main offences

Sub-section (1) says no court shall take cognizance of any offence under section 132, section 133, section 134, section 135 or section 135A, or section 135AA, except with the previous sanction of the Principal Commissioner of Customs or Commissioner of Customs.

Two printing points. The words "or section 135AA" carry a footnote saying they were inserted by section 96 of the Finance Act, 2022 (6 of 2022). The copy consulted prints no section 135AA, so this article describes nothing about it. The portal also prints "Principal Commissioner of Custom" without the final "s". We flag these rather than correct them.

Sanction is a gate before the court. The articles on the offences themselves are sections 132 to 134, section 135 and sections 135A and 135B. If you are facing a prosecution complaint, ask whether sanction was obtained and whether it came from the authority the section names. Our legal dispute resolution team can examine the papers with you.

Section 137(2): sanction for offences by officers (section 136)

Sub-section (2) deals with cognizance of an offence under section 136 (offences by officers of customs; see our article on section 136).

OfficerSanction needed
Not lower in rank than Assistant Commissioner of Customs or Deputy Commissioner of CustomsThe previous sanction of the Central Government
Lower in rank than Assistant Commissioner or Deputy CommissionerThe previous sanction of the Principal Commissioner of Customs or Commissioner of Customs

Section 137(3): compounding of offences

Sub-section (3) says any offence under "this Chapter", that is Chapter XVI, may be compounded:

  • By whom: the Principal Chief Commissioner of Customs or Chief Commissioner of Customs.
  • When: either before or after the institution of prosecution.
  • On what terms: payment by the person accused of the offence, to the Central Government, of such compounding amount, and in such manner of compounding, as may be specified by rules.

The footnotes show that sub-section (3) was inserted by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 (23 of 2004), with effect from 10 September 2004, and that the words "such compounding amount and in such manner of compounding" were substituted by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2009 (33 of 2009), with effect from 19 August 2009.

The Act itself prints no compounding amount. It leaves the amount and the manner to rules, and this article states none.

The rules on compounding

The rules made for this purpose are named, in their own opening lines, the Customs (Compounding of Offences) Rules, 2005. The copy consulted is dated 22 August 2022; that is the date of the rules copy, not of the Act text. The rules begin by saying they are made under section 156(2)(h) read with section 137(3). Rule 2(c) defines the "compounding authority" as the Principal Chief Commissioner of Customs or Chief Commissioner of Customs having jurisdiction over the place where the offence has been or is alleged to have been committed. The rules have their own application procedure and method for fixing the amount; we leave the rule-wise detail to a separate article and state no amount here. Please check the rules in force at the time of application.

The proviso: who cannot compound

The proviso says that nothing in sub-section (3) applies to the following.

ClauseExcluded person or case
(a)A person who has been allowed to compound once in respect of any offence under sections 135 and 135A
(b)A person accused of an offence under the Act which is also an offence under any of four named Acts: the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (61 of 1985); the Chemical Weapons Convention Act, 2000 (34 of 2000); the Arms Act, 1959 (54 of 1959); the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 (53 of 1972)
(c)A person involved in smuggling of goods falling under certain heads, listed in (i) to (iii) below
(d)A person who has been allowed to compound once in respect of any offence under the Chapter for goods of value exceeding rupees one crore
(e)A person who has been convicted under the Act on or after the 30th day of December, 2005

Clause (c) covers:

  1. goods specified in the list of Special Chemicals, Organisms, Materials, Equipment and Technology in Appendix 3 to Schedule 2 (Export Policy) of the ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items of the Foreign Trade Policy, as amended from time to time, issued under section 5 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 (22 of 1992);
  2. goods specified as prohibited items for import and export in that Classification; and
  3. any other goods or documents which are likely to affect friendly relations with a foreign State or are derogatory to national honour.

The proviso was inserted by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2009 (33 of 2009), with effect from 19 August 2009, as the footnote shows.

Observe what the text does and does not say. Compounding is available for "any offence under this Chapter", subject to the proviso. The proviso excludes certain persons and certain goods, not whole sections. A first-time compounding of a section 135 offence is therefore within the sub-section, while a second one by the same person is excluded by clause (a). Clause (d) is separate: it is about goods valued above one crore of rupees and a person already allowed to compound once for any offence under the Chapter.

An example. Neha Traders is accused of an offence under section 135 and has never compounded before, and none of the proviso's other clauses applies. Sub-section (3) allows the compounding authority to compound on payment of the amount fixed under the rules, either before or after prosecution is started. If the same company later faces another section 135 charge, clause (a) bars compounding. Whether any such case qualifies is a matter for the facts and the rules in force.

Compounding and other proceedings

Compounding under section 137(3) is an answer to prosecution for offences. The text says nothing about confiscation, penalty or duty demands, which proceed under their own provisions. For the penalty side, read our overview of penalties under sections 112 to 117. Whether an arrest follows or a bail question arises is dealt with in other sections; see our article on sections 138 to 138B for the trial side.

Need help with prosecution or compounding?

Whether to seek compounding, and when, depends on the charge, your history and the goods involved. Our team can read the complaint against the proviso with you and explain the steps. Reach us through legal dispute resolution.

Key takeaways

  • Section 137(1): previous sanction of the Principal Commissioner of Customs or Commissioner of Customs before a court takes cognizance of offences under sections 132, 133, 134, 135 and 135A (and the section 135AA the copy refers to but does not print).
  • Section 137(2): sanction for section 136 offences depends on the officer's rank.
  • Section 137(3): any offence under Chapter XVI may be compounded by the Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner, before or after prosecution, on payment of the amount fixed under rules.
  • The proviso excludes five groups, including repeat compounding for sections 135 and 135A, offences also under four named Acts, and convictions on or after 30 December 2005.
  • The Act prints no compounding amount.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the Customs Act, 1962 as published on the CBIC Tax Information Portal, updated to 30 March 2022 (amended up to the Finance Act, 2022), as consulted on 2 October 2026. Finance Acts of 2023 and later, and the current rules, regulations and notifications, should be checked. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Section 137

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Who gives the sanction for prosecution under sections 132 to 135A?

The Principal Commissioner of Customs or Commissioner of Customs, under section 137(1).

Who can compound an offence under the Customs Act?

Section 137(3) names the Principal Chief Commissioner of Customs or Chief Commissioner of Customs.

Check whether the item is free, restricted or prohibited before you quote a price.

— TaxClue Trade & FEMA Desk

Section 137: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,327 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 7 questions readers ask most on this topic.

The Principal Commissioner of Customs or Commissioner of Customs, under section 137(1).

Section 137(3) names the Principal Chief Commissioner of Customs or Chief Commissioner of Customs.

Yes. The text says either before or after the institution of prosecution.

The Act does not say. It refers to the amount specified by rules.

Proviso clause (a) excludes a person who has been allowed to compound once in respect of any offence under sections 135 and 135A.

Sub-section (1) does, with a footnote citing section 96 of the Finance Act, 2022. The copy consulted prints no section 135AA, so we say nothing about what it provides.

The article reflects the portal copy updated to 30 March 2022. Please check later Finance Act changes to section 137 and the rules before acting.