Next due
11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 2 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 6 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 11 days 21 OCTTax Audit Report · Form 3CA/3CB · AY 2026-27 · extended from 30 Sepin 12 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 21 days 7 NOVTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Oct 2026in 29 days 21 NOVITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27 · extended from 31 Octin 43 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 51 days
All due dates

Sections 122-125 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925: onerous bequests and contingent bequests

As per the text of the Act consulted: where a bequest imposes an obligation on the legatee, he can take nothing by it unless he accepts it fully (s.122). Where a will contains two...

Published
Updated
Reading time
9 min
Views
2
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Medium Complexity
  • In-Depth Guide
Topic
Property Law
Published
October 2, 2026
Last updated
Oct 9, 2026
Reading time
9 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

A gift under a will can come with a burden. A gift can also depend on a person staying alive until a certain time. Sections 122 and 123 deal with burdened gifts, which the Act calls onerous bequests. Sections 124 and 125 deal with gifts that depend on an event or on who is alive when payment falls due.

Section 122: an onerous bequest must be accepted fully

Section 122 states: where a bequest imposes an obligation on the legatee, he can take nothing by it unless he accepts it fully.

The Act's illustration: A has shares in X, a prosperous joint stock company, and also shares in Y, a joint stock company in difficulties, on which heavy calls are expected. A bequeaths to B all his shares in joint stock companies. B refuses to accept the shares in Y. He forfeits the shares in X.

The point is that the gift is one bequest ("all his shares in joint stock companies"), and the legatee cannot pick the good and leave the burden. The section does not say how acceptance is made or what counts as a refusal; the text is silent on form.

A reader who is left a gift that carries a liability, such as shares with unpaid calls or a leasehold with rent, should look at the exact words of the bequest before deciding. A legal consultation can help with that reading.

Section 123: two separate and independent bequests

Section 123 states: where a will contains two separate and independent bequests to the same person, the legatee is at liberty to accept one of them and refuse the other, although the former may be beneficial and the latter onerous.

The Act's illustration: A has a lease for a term of years of a house at a rent which he and his representatives are bound to pay during the term, and which is higher than the house can be let for. He bequeaths to B the lease and a sum of money. B refuses to accept the lease. He will not by this refusal forfeit the money.

Reading sections 122 and 123 together, the dividing line is whether the will contains one bequest or two separate and independent ones. In illustration to section 122 it is one bequest of "all his shares". In the illustration to section 123 the lease and the money are separate bequests. The Transfer of Property Act, 1882 has a related provision on onerous gifts; see our article on sections 127 to 129 of that Act and check the current law for the corresponding provision.

Section 124: a legacy given if an uncertain event happens

Section 124 states: where a legacy is given if a specified uncertain event shall happen and no time is mentioned in the will for the occurrence of that event, the legacy cannot take effect, unless such event happens before the period when the fund bequeathed is payable or distributable.

The Act's illustrations, retold:

  1. A legacy is bequeathed to A, and in case of his death, to B. If A survives the testator, the legacy to B does not take effect.
  2. A legacy is bequeathed to A, and in case of his death without children, to B. If A survives the testator or dies in his lifetime leaving a child, the legacy to B does not take effect.
  3. A legacy is bequeathed to A when and if he attains 18, and in case of his death, to B. A attains 18. The legacy to B does not take effect.
  4. A legacy is bequeathed to A for life, then to B, and in case of B's death without children, to C. The words "in case of B's death without children" are to be understood as meaning in case B dies without children during the lifetime of A.
  5. A legacy is bequeathed to A for life, then to B, and in case of B's death, to C. The words "in case of B's death" are to be considered as meaning in case B dies in the lifetime of A.

Illustrations 4 and 5 show how the section fills the gap when the will names no time: the event must occur within the lifetime of the earlier holder. The vesting rule that sits behind this is in section 120; read our article on contingent legacies.

Section 125: survivors at a period not specified

Section 125 states: where a bequest is made to such of certain persons as shall be surviving at some period, but the exact period is not specified, the legacy shall go to such of them as are alive at the time of payment or distribution, unless a contrary intention appears by the will.

The Act's four illustrations:

No.FactsResult
(i)Property to A and B, to be equally divided between them, or to the survivor. If both survive the testator they divide equally; if A dies before the testator and B survivesIt goes to B
(ii)Property to A for life, then to B and C equally or to the survivor. B dies during A's life; C survives AAt A's death the legacy goes to C
(iii)Property to A for life, then to B and C or the survivor, with a direction that if B should not survive the testator his children are to stand in his place. C dies during the testator's life; B survives the testator but dies in A's lifetimeThe legacy goes to the representative of B
(iv)Property to A for life, then to B and C, with a direction that if either dies in A's lifetime the whole goes to the survivor. B dies in A's lifetime, afterwards C dies in A's lifetimeThe legacy goes to the representative of C

Illustration (iii) is worth a second look. The will there states that B's children are to stand in his place only if B does not survive the testator. B did survive the testator, so that direction was not triggered, and B's interest passes to his representative when he dies in A's lifetime. The text of section 125 itself gives only the "alive at the time of payment" rule; the illustrations show it giving way to the will's own directions.

Examples with invented names

Onerous gift, one bequest. Prem's will gives his nephew Kunal "my entire stock portfolio", which includes a stock with heavy unpaid calls. Under section 122, if Kunal refuses the burdened stock he takes nothing by the bequest.

Two separate bequests. Another will gives a friend a shop on a rent-heavy lease in one clause and 50,000 rupees in another. Under section 123 the friend may refuse the lease and still take the money.

Event with no time. A will gives a farm to Yash "and, if he dies without children, to Zoya". No time is stated. Under section 124 the gift over to Zoya takes effect only if Yash dies without children before the fund is payable or distributable.

Where the sections apply

Schedule III lists sections 122 to 125 among the sections of Part VI that section 57 applies to the wills and codicils of Hindus, Buddhists, Sikhs and Jainas described there. Section 58 as printed says Part VI does not apply to the testamentary succession to the property of any Muhammadan. See our article on wills of Hindus, Buddhists, Sikhs and Jainas and Schedule III.

The print consulted shows amendments only up to the Indian Succession (Amendment) Act, 2002 (26 of 2002); check for later amendments.

Need help with a burdened or conditional legacy?

When a will leaves you a gift with strings attached, or leaves a gift over on an event with no date, the right reading depends on the exact words. You can start with a legal consultation.

Key takeaways

  • An onerous bequest must be accepted fully or not at all (s.122).
  • Two separate and independent bequests may be accepted or refused one by one (s.123).
  • A gift over on an uncertain event with no time stated takes effect only if the event happens before the fund is payable or distributable (s.124).
  • A bequest to survivors at an unspecified period goes to those alive at payment or distribution, unless the will shows otherwise (s.125).
  • The illustrations show the sections giving way to the will's own words.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on an unofficial print of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 showing amendments up to the Indian Succession (Amendment) Act, 2002 (26 of 2002), as consulted on 2 October 2026. It explains the words of the statute only; later amendments, State amendments and rules, court fees and the way courts apply these sections should be checked. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Sections 122-125

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

What is an onerous bequest?

A bequest that imposes an obligation on the legatee, as in section 122.

Can a legatee accept the good part and refuse the burdened part?

Not within one bequest (s.122). He may do so where there are two separate and independent bequests (s.123).

Paperwork done properly once does not have to be done again under pressure.

— TaxClue Compliance Desk

Sections 122-125: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,350 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

A bequest that imposes an obligation on the legatee, as in section 122.

Not within one bequest (s.122). He may do so where there are two separate and independent bequests (s.123).

The legacy cannot take effect unless the event happens before the fund is payable or distributable.

At the time of payment or distribution, if the exact period is not specified and no contrary intention appears.

No. It applies "unless a contrary intention appears by the Will".

They are listed in Schedule III for the wills described in section 57; section 58 as printed excludes Muhammadans from Part VI. Check the current law.