Next due
7 OCTTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Sep 2026in 2 days 11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 6 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 10 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 15 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 25 days 31 OCTITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27in 26 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 55 days 15 DECAdvance Tax · 3rd (75%) instalment · FY 2026-27in 71 days
All due dates
Customs Live

Sections 116 and 117 of the Customs Act, 1962: penalty for not accounting for goods and the residual penalty

Under section 116, if goods loaded for importation, goods transhipped under the Act, or coastal goods are not unloaded at their destination in India, or the quantity is short, and...

Published
Updated
Reading time
8 min
Views
4
Questions
7 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • High Complexity
  • In-Depth Guide
Topic
Customs
Published
October 2, 2026
Last updated
Oct 5, 2026
Reading time
8 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Section 116 puts a penalty on the person in charge of a conveyance when imported, transhipped or coastal goods are not unloaded at their destination in India, or are short, and the shortfall is not accounted for to the satisfaction of the officer. Section 117 is the residual penalty for contravening the Act where no express penalty is provided. This article follows the text on the CBIC portal updated to 30 March 2022.

The text consulted is the CBIC copy last updated on 30 March 2022 (the Act as amended up to the Finance Act, 2022). Later Finance Acts are not in that copy; check any later change to these sections before acting.

Section 116: goods that do not reach their destination

The section concerns three kinds of goods:

  1. goods loaded in a conveyance for importation into India;
  2. goods transhipped under the provisions of the Act; and
  3. coastal goods carried in a conveyance.

The trigger is either that the goods are "not unloaded at their place of destination in India" or that "the quantity unloaded is short of the quantity to be unloaded at that destination". The second step is the officer's satisfaction: the failure or deficiency must be "not accounted for to the satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner of Customs or Deputy Commissioner of Customs". The footnote prints that these words replaced "Assistant Commissioner of Customs" by the Finance Act, 1999 (27 of 1999), with effect from 11.05.1999.

If both steps are met, "the person-in-charge of the conveyance" is liable. Note that the person named is not the importer or the owner of the cargo, but the person in charge of the conveyance, such as the master of a vessel. Shipping lines, airlines, agents of carriers and coastal operators should therefore keep manifests, unloading records and short-landing reports ready. If the carrier's agent has received a notice under this section, our legal dispute resolution team can help you prepare the reply.

The two penalty limbs

ClauseGoodsPenalty not exceeding
(a)Goods loaded for importation into India, or goods transhipped under the ActTwice the amount of duty that would have been chargeable on the goods not unloaded or the deficient goods, had they been imported
(b)Coastal goodsTwice the amount of export duty that would have been chargeable on the goods not unloaded or the deficient goods, had they been exported

Both limbs work on a "would have been chargeable" basis. The duty need not have been actually levied; the calculation asks what duty would have applied "had such goods been imported" or "had such goods been exported". The rate of duty is not set by this section, and this article quotes no rate.

An example with invented names: the vessel MV Sagar Rani is to unload 500 cartons at a port in India, but only 450 are unloaded and the master cannot account for the missing 50 to the satisfaction of the officer. The penalty is not exceeding twice the duty that would have been chargeable on the 50 cartons had they been imported. If the master satisfies the officer with a proper account of the shortage, the condition for section 116 is not met.

Section 115(1)(e), covered in our article on confiscation of conveyances, deals separately with a conveyance carrying imported goods that is found with them missing. Section 116 is the penalty route against the person in charge; section 115 is the confiscation route against the conveyance.

Section 117: penalty where nothing else applies

Section 117 is a catch-all. It applies to "any person" who:

  • contravenes any provision of the Act;
  • abets any such contravention; or
  • fails to comply with any provision of the Act with which it was his duty to comply,

and does so "where no express penalty is elsewhere provided for such contravention or failure". The consequence is a liability to a penalty "not exceeding" the amount stated in the section.

The condition at the end is the key. If another section of the Act already provides an express penalty for the contravention, section 117 does not apply to that contravention. It is the residual provision, for what other sections leave out.

A printing point on the amount

The text of section 117 prints "four lakh rupees". The footnote then reads: "words 'one lakh rupees' substituted for the words 'four lakhs rupees'", citing section 77 of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2019 (23 of 2019) with effect from 1-8-2019, and it names earlier substitutions of ten thousand rupees (Act 18 of 2008) and one thousand rupees (Act 14 of 1999). The footnote's wording does not match the amount printed in the section. This article follows the section as printed, "four lakh rupees", and flags the difference; the amount should be confirmed on the official text before it is relied on.

Who is covered

The section says "any person", so it can reach an importer, an exporter, a customs broker, a warehouse licensee, a carrier or any other person. The words "abets" and "fails to comply with any provision of this Act with which it was his duty to comply" make both active and passive conduct fall within it. A missed filing, a failure to follow a direction under the Act or a contravention without a dedicated penalty can therefore land here. Whether a particular obligation has its own penalty must be checked in each case.

Procedure

Neither section prescribes procedure. Penalties in Chapter XIV are adjudged under section 122, and section 124 requires notice and an opportunity before an order imposing a penalty. See our articles on adjudication and burden of proof and the show cause notice. For a penalty linked to short-levied duty, compare section 114A. For an overview of the penalty group see Penalties under the Customs Act, sections 112 to 117.

Practical points

  • Carriers should reconcile manifest quantities with unloading records on arrival, since section 116 turns on whether a shortage is accounted for to the officer's satisfaction.
  • Keep the account of a shortage in writing, with supporting records, before any notice arrives.
  • When a notice cites section 117, ask which provision is said to have been contravened and whether that provision has its own express penalty.

Need help with a penalty notice under section 116 or 117?

Both sections often arise from record-keeping gaps, and a clear account of the facts at the start usually shapes the whole case. Our team can review the notice and your records and help prepare a reply; see our legal dispute resolution service for customs matters and get in touch before the date given in the notice.

Key takeaways

  • Section 116 penalises the person in charge of the conveyance for imported, transhipped or coastal goods not unloaded or short, if not accounted for to the officer's satisfaction.
  • The ceiling is twice the duty that would have been chargeable; for coastal goods it is twice the export duty.
  • Section 117 applies only where no express penalty is provided elsewhere for the contravention.
  • The amount printed in section 117 is "four lakh rupees", but the footnote's wording does not match; confirm on the official text.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the Customs Act, 1962 as published on the CBIC Tax Information Portal, updated to 30 March 2022 (amended up to the Finance Act, 2022), as consulted on 2 October 2026. Finance Acts of 2023 and later, and the current rules, regulations and notifications, should be checked. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Sections 116 and 117

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Who is liable under section 116?

The person-in-charge of the conveyance.

What if the shortage is explained?

The section applies only where the failure to unload, or the deficiency, is not accounted for to the satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner of Customs.

Know which registrations your business actually needs — both too few and too many cost money.

— TaxClue Compliance Desk

Sections 116 and 117: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,327 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 7 questions readers ask most on this topic.

The person-in-charge of the conveyance.

The section applies only where the failure to unload, or the deficiency, is not accounted for to the satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner of Customs.

Yes. Clause (b) gives a penalty not exceeding twice the export duty that would have been chargeable.

Where a person contravenes or abets a contravention of the Act, or fails to comply with a provision he was bound to comply with, and no express penalty is provided elsewhere for it.

The section text prints "four lakh rupees" as the ceiling; the footnote wording is inconsistent with that, so check the official text.

Section 117 applies where no express penalty is elsewhere provided for the contravention, so it is not the route where another section has its own penalty.

It describes the CBIC portal copy updated to 30 March 2022. Check later Finance Act changes before acting.