Next due
11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 3 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 7 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 12 days 21 OCTTax Audit Report · Form 3CA/3CB · AY 2026-27 · extended from 30 Sepin 13 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 22 days 7 NOVTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Oct 2026in 30 days 21 NOVITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27 · extended from 31 Octin 44 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 52 days
All due dates

Sections 104-105 of the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020: Working in Contravention of Orders and Failure to Appoint a Manager

Section 104: whoever continues to work in contravention of any general or special order issued under section 38 faces imprisonment up to two years and is also liable to fine up to...

Published
Updated
Reading time
7 min
Views
4
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • High Complexity
Topic
Labour Laws
Published
October 1, 2026
Last updated
Oct 7, 2026
Reading time
7 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Sections 104 and 105 of the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020 (the OSH Code) each deal with one specific default. Section 104 punishes continuing to work in contravention of an order under section 38, the Inspector-cum-Facilitator's special powers. Section 105 punishes failing to appoint a manager for a mine as section 67 requires.

Sections 104 and 105 at a glance

SectionOffencePunishmentCompoundable under s.114(1)?
104Continuing to work in contravention of a general or special order under section 38Imprisonment up to 2 years, and fine up to Rs 5 lakh (court needs recorded reasons to fine below Rs 2 lakh)Not listed
105Failure to appoint a manager under section 67Imprisonment up to 3 months, or fine up to Rs 1 lakh, or bothYes, as an offence, at 75% of the maximum fine

Both defaults can be handled well if you act on the first notice. Our legal dispute resolution team can help you read an order and plan the response.

Section 104: defying a section 38 order

Section 38 gives the Inspector-cum-Facilitator special powers in respect of factories, mines, dock work and building or other construction work. Among them is the power to prohibit employment where conditions create serious hazard or imminent danger. For a factory, an order under section 38(A)(a) has effect for three days until extended by the Chief Inspector-cum-Facilitator, and only the minimum number of persons needed for minimum tasks may be employed until the hazard is removed. For mines, the powers include notices to remedy danger, prohibitions on employment in or about the mine, and prohibiting the extraction or reduction of pillars. See our section 38 article.

The offence. "Whoever continues to work in contravention of any general or special order issued under the provisions of section 38". The key word is continues: the offence is carrying on after the order, not the underlying condition.

Punishment. Imprisonment up to two years, and the person "shall also be liable to fine which may extend to five lakh rupees". The proviso says the court "shall not impose a fine under this section which shall be less than two lakh rupees without recording in the judgment the reasons for imposing such fine". So the practical floor for a fine is Rs 2 lakh unless the court explains.

Who is exposed. The text says "whoever", so it can reach the owner, occupier, manager or whoever directs work to go on; section 109 adds company liability for persons in charge. See sections 109 and 110.

What to do on receiving an order. Stop the prohibited work immediately, limit staff to those permitted, record the time, and follow the appeal route. An appeal does not, by the text of the factory clause, suspend the order. In mines, sub-clause (i) says a notice or order to which objection is made must still be complied with pending the objection, although the Central Government may suspend a notice under sub-clause (a) on application. The remedies against a factory order (appeal to the High Court) and the wages rule (affected persons are entitled to wages and benefits; the occupier must try to provide alternative employment) are in section 38 itself. Employers who want help on the response can use our legal dispute resolution team.

Section 104 is not in the compounding list in section 114(1), so a prosecution under it is decided by the court.

Section 105: failure to appoint a mine manager

Section 67(1) requires that, save as otherwise prescribed, every mine be under a sole manager with qualifications prescribed by the Central Government, and the owner or agent must appoint a person with those qualifications. The owner or agent may appoint himself if he has the qualifications. Sub-section (2) makes the manager responsible for overall management, control, supervision and direction; sub-section (3) stops the owner or agent from bypassing the manager except in an emergency. See sections 67 and 68.

Section 105: "Whoever in compliance of the provisions of section 67, fails to appoint a manager shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three months, or with fine which may extend to one lakh rupees, or with both."

Three observations.

  1. The duty falls on the owner or agent who must appoint. The text of section 105 says "whoever".
  2. The offence is failure to appoint. A manager who is appointed but unqualified raises a different question, governed by the prescribed qualifications.
  3. Section 105 is an offence, in the compounding list in section 114(1). At 75 per cent of the maximum fine, composition would be Rs 75,000. Composition is unavailable for a repeat within three years of an earlier composition or conviction. See sections 113 and 114.

Qualifications. Section 67(1) says the qualifications are those prescribed by the Central Government. The Central Rules, 2026 carry rule 107 on this; see our rule 107 article and check the rule text before acting.

How prosecutions are run

For mines, section 107 restricts who can start a prosecution against an owner, agent or manager; see sections 106 to 108. Section 110(1) requires a 30-day opportunity to comply before prosecution, except in case of an accident or a repeat of the same violation within three years.

Example. An inspector stops work in a section of a factory that shows a serious hazard, allowing only a skeleton crew. The occupier lets the full shift continue the next day. That is continuing to work in contravention of a section 38 order, and section 104 applies. Separately, a newly acquired mine is run for weeks by an agent without a qualified manager; section 105 is engaged against whoever was obliged to appoint one.

Need help responding to an order or a notice?

Orders under section 38 and notices about mine management move fast, and the first reply often decides how the matter goes. Our legal dispute resolution team can help you comply with an order, file an appeal or objection and prepare for any prosecution.

Key takeaways

  • Section 104: working on after a section 38 order is punishable with up to 2 years and a fine up to Rs 5 lakh; fine below Rs 2 lakh needs recorded reasons.
  • Section 105: not appointing a qualified mine manager under section 67 carries up to 3 months, or fine up to Rs 1 lakh, or both.
  • Only section 105 is in the compounding list in section 114(1).
  • Comply with an order first, and challenge it through the route the Code provides.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020 (as enacted) and, where noted, the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions (Central) Rules, 2026 (G.S.R. 345(E), 8 May 2026), as on 30 September 2026. The Code is in force from 21 November 2025; some provisions may be notified later, and State Governments make their own rules for establishments where the State is the appropriate Government. Verify the current position before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Sections 104-105

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

What is the penalty for ignoring a section 38 order?

Imprisonment up to two years and fine up to Rs 5 lakh under section 104.

Can the court impose a small fine under section 104?

Not below Rs 2 lakh without recording reasons in the judgment.

A penalty is the visible cost of a delay; the lost time and credibility are the larger part.

— TaxClue Compliance Desk

Sections 104-105: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,350 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

Imprisonment up to two years and fine up to Rs 5 lakh under section 104.

Not below Rs 2 lakh without recording reasons in the judgment.

The owner or agent, under section 67(1); the owner or agent may appoint himself if qualified.

Imprisonment up to three months, or fine up to Rs 1 lakh, or both.

It is not in the list in section 114(1).

The Code does not say so for the factory clause, so assume the order binds until it is set aside or varied; take advice.