Next due
7 OCTTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Sep 2026in 4 days 11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 8 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 12 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 17 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 27 days 31 OCTITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27in 28 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 57 days 15 DECAdvance Tax · 3rd (75%) instalment · FY 2026-27in 73 days
All due dates

Sections 1-2 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963: short title, extent, commencement and definitions

Section 1 says the Act is called the Specific Relief Act, 1963, extends as printed to the whole of India with one exception named in the text, and came into force on a date fixed...

Published
Updated
Reading time
8 min
Views
6
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Medium Complexity
  • In-Depth Guide
Topic
Specific Relief
Published
October 2, 2026
Last updated
Oct 3, 2026
Reading time
8 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Sections 1 and 2 are the opening provisions of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. Section 1 gives the Act its name, says where it extends and says how it begins to operate. Section 2 defines four terms (obligation, settlement, trust and trustee) and sends every other undefined word to the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

This article follows the consolidated text of the Act consulted (amendments shown up to Act 18 of 2018). Later amendments should be checked before you rely on any provision.

Section 1: title, extent and commencement

Section 1(1) says: "This Act may be called the Specific Relief Act, 1963." That is the only job of the sub-section. Citations, pleadings and agreements that refer to "the Specific Relief Act" mean this statute, Act 47 of 1963.

Section 1(2) is the extent clause. As printed in the text consulted, it reads: "It extends to the whole of India except the State of Jammu and Kashmir." The extent clause should be checked in the current Act, because the text consulted shows nothing later than the 2018 amendment and this article does not say whether the clause has been altered since.

Section 1(3) deals with commencement. It says the Act "shall come into force on such date as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint." The text carries a footnote at that point: the date was 1 March 1964, under notification No. S.O. 189 dated 13 January 1964, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, section 3(ii). So the Act received its enactment date of 13 December 1963 (printed under the title) but began to operate only on 1 March 1964.

Sub-sectionWhat it doesWhat the text consulted shows
1(1)Short title"Specific Relief Act, 1963"
1(2)ExtentWhole of India except the State of Jammu and Kashmir, as printed
1(3)CommencementDate to be appointed by Central Government notification; footnote gives 1 March 1964

The enacting words printed before Part I read "as follow" rather than "as follows". That is how the consulted print has it, and it is noted here only so that a reader comparing texts is not surprised.

The long title describes the Act as one "to define and amend the law relating to certain kinds of specific relief". For a business with a contract dispute, the practical point is that this Act does not create the contract or the right; it supplies the court orders (possession, performance, correction, cancellation, declaration, injunction) by which a right that already exists can be enforced in specie. If you want a first orientation on the whole Act, see our introduction to the Specific Relief Act, 1963, and if you are weighing a dispute under a contract you can speak to us about your legal position.

Section 2: the definitions

Section 2 opens with the words "In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires". The phrase matters: the meanings below apply throughout the Act, but a section whose context points elsewhere can read differently.

2(a) "obligation" "includes every duty enforceable by law". The word is inclusive, so it is not limited to duties arising from a contract. Section 38 on perpetual injunctions, for instance, speaks of an "obligation" existing in favour of the plaintiff, and it separates obligations arising from contract from other obligations. The definition is the reason that wider reading is available.

2(b) "settlement" means "an instrument (other than a will or codicil as defined by the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (39 of 1925), whereby the destination or devolution of successive interests in movable or immovable property is disposed of or is agreed to be disposed of". In plain words, it is a document that arranges who gets which interest in property one after another, such as a family arrangement that gives a life interest to one person and the remainder to another. A will or codicil is excluded. A printing slip: the bracket opened before "other than a will or codicil" is never closed in the text consulted. Section 15 of this Act (who may obtain specific performance) and section 25 (awards and wills) both use the word, which is why it is defined at the start. For a related practical subject see our post on registration of settlement deeds.

2(c) "trust" "has the same meaning as in section 3 of the Indian Trusts Act, 1882 (2 of 1882), and includes an obligation in the nature of a trust within the meaning of Chapter IX of that Act". The Act does not restate what a trust is. It borrows the definition from the Trusts Act. To understand how a trust comes into existence under that law, read our post on the Indian Trusts Act, 1882 on how a trust is created, and for the obligations in the nature of a trust, our post on Indian Trusts Act, 1882 sections 80-83.

2(d) "trustee" "includes every person holding property in trust". The verb "includes" again makes the definition wide: anyone who holds property in trust is within it, whatever title they carry.

2(e) all other words "used herein but not defined, and defined in the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (9 of 1872), have the meanings respectively assigned to them in that Act." This is a borrowing clause. Words such as "contract", "promise", "agreement" and "consideration" are not defined in the Specific Relief Act; the Contract Act supplies them. Our post on the Indian Contract Act, 1872, section 2 definitions explains that vocabulary.

ClauseTermDefinition in shortWhere the meaning comes from
2(a)ObligationEvery duty enforceable by lawThis Act
2(b)SettlementInstrument (not a will or codicil) disposing of successive interests in propertyThis Act, with the Indian Succession Act, 1925 for will and codicil
2(c)TrustSame meaning as section 3 of the Indian Trusts Act, 1882, plus obligations in the nature of a trust under Chapter IXIndian Trusts Act, 1882
2(d)TrusteeIncludes every person holding property in trustThis Act
2(e)Other wordsMeanings given in the Indian Contract Act, 1872Indian Contract Act, 1872

Why these definitions matter in practice

A buyer, landlord, contractor or company seeking specific relief should read section 2 before reading any later section, for three reasons.

First, the Act depends on other laws for its vocabulary. If the question is whether a document is a "contract" or whether an "agreement" is enforceable, the answer sits in the Contract Act, not here. Second, "trust" and "trustee" turn up in several provisions, including those on suits for movable property, on specific performance of contracts connected with trusts and on the effect of a declaration, so the borrowed definition shapes who may sue and who is bound. Third, "obligation" is wide enough to reach duties that are not contractual, which is why the Act can deal with injunctions to prevent a breach of such duties.

The next provisions, sections 3 and 4, deal with savings and with the limit that specific relief is for individual civil rights; read them in our article on sections 3-4 of the Specific Relief Act.

Need help with a dispute that turns on these definitions?

If a document you hold looks like a settlement, a trust or a contract and you are unsure which Act and which remedy applies, a short review of the papers usually settles it. You can book a legal consultation to talk through the facts before any step is taken.

Key takeaways

  • Section 1(1) names the Act the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (Act 47 of 1963).
  • Section 1(2), as printed in the text consulted, extends the Act to the whole of India except the State of Jammu and Kashmir; check the extent clause in the current Act.
  • Section 1(3) leaves commencement to a Central Government notification; the footnote gives 1 March 1964.
  • Section 2 defines obligation, settlement, trust and trustee, and sends other words to the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
  • The definitions apply "unless the context otherwise requires".

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on a consolidated text of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 showing amendments up to the Specific Relief (Amendment) Act, 2018 (in force from 1 October 2018), as consulted on 2 October 2026. Later amendments, notifications under the Act and the law of limitation should be checked. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Sections 1-2

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

When did the Specific Relief Act, 1963 come into force?

Section 1(3) leaves the date to a Central Government notification. The footnote in the text consulted gives 1 March 1964, under notification No. S.O. 189 dated 13 January 1964.

What does "obligation" mean in the Specific Relief Act?

Section 2(a) says it includes every duty enforceable by law. It is therefore not limited to contractual duties.

What is not written down will be remembered differently by everyone involved.

— TaxClue Compliance Desk

Sections 1-2: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
11,561 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

Section 1(3) leaves the date to a Central Government notification. The footnote in the text consulted gives 1 March 1964, under notification No. S.O. 189 dated 13 January 1964.

Section 2(a) says it includes every duty enforceable by law. It is therefore not limited to contractual duties.

No. The definition covers an instrument that disposes of successive interests in property, and it expressly excludes a will or codicil as defined by the Indian Succession Act, 1925.

Section 2(c) takes the meaning from section 3 of the Indian Trusts Act, 1882 and adds an obligation in the nature of a trust within the meaning of Chapter IX of that Act.

Section 2(e) says words not defined here but defined in the Indian Contract Act, 1872 carry the meanings given in that Act.

As printed in the text consulted, it extends to the whole of India except the State of Jammu and Kashmir. That extent clause should be checked in the current Act.